Literature DB >> 12211431

Low-magnitude mechanical loading becomes osteogenic when rest is inserted between each load cycle.

Sundar Srinivasan1, David A Weimer, Steven C Agans, Steven D Bain, Ted S Gross.   

Abstract

Strategies to counteract bone loss with exercise have had fairly limited success, particularly those regimens subjecting the skeleton to mild activity such as walking. In contrast, here we show that it is possible to induce substantial bone formation with low-magnitude loading. In two distinct in vivo models of bone adaptation, we found that insertion of a 10-s rest interval between each load cycle transformed a locomotion-like loading regime that minimally influenced osteoblast activity into a potent anabolic stimulus. In the avian ulna model, the minimal mean (+SE) periosteal labeled surface (Ps.LS) observed in the intact contralateral bones (1.6 +/- 1.5%) was doubled after 3 consecutive days of low-magnitude loading (3.8 +/- 1.5%; p = 0.03). However, modifying the regimen by inserting 10 s of rest between each load cycle significantly enhanced the periosteal response (21.9 +/- 4.5%; p = 0.03). In the murine tibia model, 5 consecutive days of 100 low-magnitude loading cycles did not significantly alter mean periosteal bone formation rate (BFR) compared with contralateral bones (0.011 +/- 0.005 microm3/microm2 per day vs. 0.021 +/- 0.013 microm3/microm2 per day). In contrast, separating each of 10 of the same loading cycles with 10 s of rest significantly elevated periosteal BFR (0.167 +/- 0.049 microm3/microm2 per day; p = 0.01). Endocortical bone formation parameters were not altered by any loading regimen in either model. We conclude that 10 s of rest between each load cycle of a low-magnitude loading protocol greatly enhances the osteogenic potential of the regimen.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12211431      PMCID: PMC1435731          DOI: 10.1359/jbmr.2002.17.9.1613

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Miner Res        ISSN: 0884-0431            Impact factor:   6.741


  39 in total

1.  The density and strength of proteoglycan-proteoglycan interaction sites in concentrated solutions.

Authors:  W Zhu; W M Lai; V C Mow
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 2.712

2.  Regulation of bone mass by mechanical strain magnitude.

Authors:  C T Rubin; L E Lanyon
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1985-07       Impact factor: 4.333

3.  Appendicular bone density and age predict hip fracture in women. The Study of Osteoporotic Fractures Research Group.

Authors:  S R Cummings; D M Black; M C Nevitt; W S Browner; J A Cauley; H K Genant; S R Mascioli; J C Scott; D G Seeley; P Steiger
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1990-02-02       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Influence of hemodynamic forces on vascular endothelial function. In vitro studies of shear stress and pinocytosis in bovine aortic cells.

Authors:  P F Davies; C F Dewey; S R Bussolari; E J Gordon; M A Gimbrone
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  1984-04       Impact factor: 14.808

5.  A fiber matrix model for fluid flow and streaming potentials in the canaliculi of an osteon.

Authors:  Y Zeng; S C Cowin; S Weinbaum
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  1994 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.934

6.  Effects of high-intensity strength training on multiple risk factors for osteoporotic fractures. A randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  M E Nelson; M A Fiatarone; C M Morganti; I Trice; R A Greenberg; W J Evans
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1994-12-28       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  Fluid shear stress as a mediator of osteoblast cyclic adenosine monophosphate production.

Authors:  K M Reich; C V Gay; J A Frangos
Journal:  J Cell Physiol       Date:  1990-04       Impact factor: 6.384

8.  Prevention of postmenopausal osteoporosis. A comparative study of exercise, calcium supplementation, and hormone-replacement therapy.

Authors:  R L Prince; M Smith; I M Dick; R I Price; P G Webb; N K Henderson; M M Harris
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1991-10-24       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Role of peak bone mass and bone loss in postmenopausal osteoporosis: 12 year study.

Authors:  M A Hansen; K Overgaard; B J Riis; C Christiansen
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1991-10-19

10.  Mechanical loading thresholds for lamellar and woven bone formation.

Authors:  C H Turner; M R Forwood; J Y Rho; T Yoshikawa
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 6.741

View more
  76 in total

Review 1.  Why rest stimulates bone formation: a hypothesis based on complex adaptive phenomenon.

Authors:  Ted S Gross; Sandra L Poliachik; Brandon J Ausk; David A Sanford; Blair A Becker; Sundar Srinivasan
Journal:  Exerc Sport Sci Rev       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 6.230

2.  A meta-analysis of brief high-impact exercises for enhancing bone health in premenopausal women.

Authors:  O O Babatunde; J J Forsyth; C J Gidlow
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2011-09-28       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  Methods and theory in bone modeling drift: comparing spatial analyses of primary bone distributions in the human humerus.

Authors:  Corey M Maggiano; Isabel S Maggiano; Vera G Tiesler; Julio R Chi-Keb; Sam D Stout
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2015-10-15       Impact factor: 2.610

Review 4.  Molecular pathways mediating mechanical signaling in bone.

Authors:  Janet Rubin; Clinton Rubin; Christopher Rae Jacobs
Journal:  Gene       Date:  2005-12-19       Impact factor: 3.688

Review 5.  Mechanisms by which exercise improves bone strength.

Authors:  Charles H Turner; Alexander G Robling
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 2.626

6.  Upregulation of osteopontin by osteocytes deprived of mechanical loading or oxygen.

Authors:  Ted S Gross; Katy A King; Natalia A Rabaia; Pranali Pathare; Sundar Srinivasan
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2004-10-11       Impact factor: 6.741

7.  Cancellous bone adaptation to in vivo loading in a rabbit model.

Authors:  Marjolein C H van der Meulen; Timothy G Morgan; Xu Yang; Todd H Baldini; Elizabeth R Myers; Timothy M Wright; Mathias P G Bostrom
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2006-01-23       Impact factor: 4.398

8.  32 wk old C3H/HeJ mice actively respond to mechanical loading.

Authors:  Sandra L Poliachik; DeWayne Threet; Sundar Srinivasan; Ted S Gross
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2008-01-15       Impact factor: 4.398

9.  Bone loss from high repetitive high force loading is prevented by ibuprofen treatment.

Authors:  N X Jain; A E Barr-Gillespie; B D Clark; D M Kietrys; C K Wade; J Litvin; S N Popoff; M F Barbe
Journal:  J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 2.041

10.  Numerical modeling of long bone adaptation due to mechanical loading: correlation with experiments.

Authors:  Natarajan Chennimalai Kumar; Jonathan A Dantzig; Iwona M Jasiuk; Alex G Robling; Charles H Turner
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2009-12-15       Impact factor: 3.934

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.