Literature DB >> 25193326

Anatomy of the proximal femur at the time of total hip arthroplasty is a matter of morphotype and etiology but not gender.

Matthieu Ollivier1, Sebastien Parratte, Thomas Le Corroller, Thomas Lecorroller, Andrea Reggiori, Pierre Champsaur, Jean-Noël Argenson.   

Abstract

This study aimed to determine (1) whether: gender, morphotype, or etiology are correlated with the shape of the proximal femur in patients with advanced hip osteoarthritis and (2) is there any clinical predictive factors of potential abnormal anatomy of the hip at the time of total hip arthroplasty (THA)? We reviewed 689 European hips of patients who underwent THA for primary osteoarthritis (OA) or avascular necrosis (AVN), between 2000 and 2005. The patients were stratified according to their (1) Morphotype, (2) Gender, and (3) Etiology for undergoing THA. Two independent observers measured the following four anatomical parameters on preoperative CT-scans: neck shaft angle (NSA) and femoral neck version, femoral offset and lower-limb torsion. Our results showed that both morphotype and etiology, but not gender or body mass index, were correlated with femoral anatomical parameters. Two types of patients were identified as "at risk" for abnormal hip anatomy: (1) AVN-Endomorphic patients (2) OA-Ectomorphic patients. Etiology of the advanced hip osteoarthritis and patients' morphotype may predict the proximal femur anatomy at the time of THA.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25193326     DOI: 10.1007/s00276-014-1368-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat        ISSN: 0930-1038            Impact factor:   1.246


  30 in total

1.  [A clinical observation as example and proof of functional adaptation of bone through longitudinal growth].

Authors:  F Pauwels
Journal:  Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb       Date:  1975-02

2.  A comparison of two implant systems in restoration of hip geometry in arthroplasty.

Authors:  Michael J Archibeck; Tamara Cummins; Joshua Carothers; Daniel W Junick; Richard E White
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Relation between lower extremity alignment and proximal femur anatomy. Parameters during total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  M Ollivier; S Parratte; L Lecoz; X Flecher; J-N Argenson
Journal:  Orthop Traumatol Surg Res       Date:  2013-06-24       Impact factor: 2.256

4.  Relationship of body composition to somatotype.

Authors:  M H Slaughter; T G Lohman
Journal:  Am J Phys Anthropol       Date:  1976-03       Impact factor: 2.868

5.  An evaluation of CT-scan to locate the femoral head centre and its implication for hip surgeons.

Authors:  Anthony Viste; Franck Trouillet; Rodolphe Testa; Laurence Chèze; Romain Desmarchelier; Michel-Henri Fessy
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2013-07-24       Impact factor: 1.246

6.  Three-dimensional morphology of the proximal femur.

Authors:  O Husmann; P J Rubin; P F Leyvraz; B de Roguin; J N Argenson
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 4.757

7.  Femoral and tibial bone torsions associated with medial femoro-tibial osteoarthritis. Index of cumulative torsions.

Authors:  F Duparc; J M Thomine; J Simonet; N Biga
Journal:  Orthop Traumatol Surg Res       Date:  2014-01-20       Impact factor: 2.256

8.  The anatomic basis of femoral component design.

Authors:  P C Noble; J W Alexander; L J Lindahl; D T Yew; W M Granberry; H S Tullos
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1988-10       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 9.  Do we need gender-specific total joint arthroplasty?

Authors:  Aaron J Johnson; Christopher R Costa; Michael A Mont
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Differences in hip morphology between the sexes in patients undergoing hip resurfacing.

Authors:  Henry D Atkinson; Karanjeev S Johal; Charles Willis-Owen; Steven Zadow; Roger D Oakeshott
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2010-10-15       Impact factor: 2.359

View more
  5 in total

1.  Morphological consistency of bilateral hip joints in adults based on the X-ray and CT data.

Authors:  Ran Zhao; Hong Cai; Hua Tian; Ke Zhang
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2021-01-23       Impact factor: 1.246

2.  Distances between bony landmarks and adjacent nerves: anatomical factors that may influence retractor placement in total hip replacement surgery.

Authors:  Ta-I Wang; Hui-Yi Chen; Chun-Hao Tsai; Horng-Chaung Hsu; Tsung-Li Lin
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2016-03-16       Impact factor: 2.359

3.  A 10-Year Follow-Up of Two-Incision and Modified Watson-Jones Total Hip Arthroplasty in Patients with Osteonecrosis of the Femoral Head.

Authors:  Shih-Jie Lin; Tsan-Wen Huang; Po-Chun Lin; Feng-Chih Kuo; Kuo-Ti Peng; Kuo-Chin Huang; Mel S Lee
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2017-03-12       Impact factor: 3.411

4.  Application of three-dimensional reconstruction to improve the preoperative measurement accuracy and applicability of femoral neck torsion angle.

Authors:  Qing Han; Aobo Zhang; Chenyu Wang; Kerong Yang; Jincheng Wang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 1.817

5.  Determination of Femoral Neck Angle and Torsion Angle Utilizing a Novel Three-Dimensional Modeling and Analytical Technology Based on CT Datasets.

Authors:  Maximilian J Hartel; Andreas Petersik; Anne Schmidt; Daniel Kendoff; Jakob Nüchtern; Johannes M Rueger; Wolfgang Lehmann; Lars G Grossterlinden
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-03-02       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.