Literature DB >> 9195321

Three-dimensional morphology of the proximal femur.

O Husmann1, P J Rubin, P F Leyvraz, B de Roguin, J N Argenson.   

Abstract

In the field of uncemented hip arthroplasties, secondary biologic fixation of femoral implants depends directly on the quality of the primary stability. Metaphyseal filling and a good fit between the implant and the proximal femur improve initial stabilization and optimize the transmission of forces to the bone. Precise knowledge of the three-dimensional femoral shape is essential to the design and selection of adapted implants. Three hundred ten femurs in 300 patients suffering from primary hip osteoarthritis were analyzed by computed tomography scanning. After three-dimensional reconstruction, several measurements were extracted, and the parameters essential to the characterization of the diverse femoral morphologies encountered were identified. A new classification of the proximal femur is proposed. The consequences on the design and the preoperative selection of femoral implants are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9195321     DOI: 10.1016/s0883-5403(97)90201-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Arthroplasty        ISSN: 0883-5403            Impact factor:   4.757


  49 in total

1.  Re: Increased anteversion of press-fit femoral stems compared with anatomic femur.

Authors:  Michael Wettstein; Elyazid Mouhsine
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Cam type femoro-acetabular impingement: quantifying the diagnosis using three dimensional head-neck ratios.

Authors:  Milad Masjedi; Charles S Marquardt; Isabella M H Drummond; Simon J Harris; Justin P Cobb
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2012-06-08       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 3.  The femoral neck-shaft angle on plain radiographs: a systematic review.

Authors:  Christoph Kolja Boese; Jens Dargel; Johannes Oppermann; Peer Eysel; Max Joseph Scheyerer; Jan Bredow; Philipp Lechler
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2015-08-25       Impact factor: 2.199

4.  Outcomes of cerclage wiring to manage intra-operative femoral fracture occurring during cementless hemiarthroplasty in older patients with femoral neck fractures.

Authors:  Aasis Unnanuntana; Nakarin Saiyudthong
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2019-04-09       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  Radiograph-based femur morphing method.

Authors:  E M Zanetti; V Crupi; C Bignardi; P M Calderale
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 2.602

6.  The anatomy of the acetabulum: what is normal?

Authors:  Viktor Krebs; Stephen J Incavo; William H Shields
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-07-22       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Evaluation of proximal femoral geometry in plain anterior-posterior radiograph in eastern-Indian population.

Authors:  Sanchita Roy; Rajib Kundu; Shyamalendu Medda; Avanish Gupta; Baljit Kaur Nanrah
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2014-09-20

8.  Basic science considerations in primary total hip replacement arthroplasty.

Authors:  Saqeb B Mirza; Douglas G Dunlop; Sukhmeet S Panesar; Syed G Naqvi; Shafat Gangoo; Saif Salih
Journal:  Open Orthop J       Date:  2010-05-11

9.  A stature-specific concept for uncemented, primary total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Georg W Omlor; Hannah Ullrich; Knut Krahmer; Alexander Jung; Günther Aldinger; Peter Aldinger
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 3.717

10.  Custom stems for femoral deformity in patients less than 40 years of age: 70 hips followed for an average of 14 years.

Authors:  Michael Akbar; Guenther Aldinger; Knut Krahmer; Thomas Bruckner; Peter R Aldinger
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 3.717

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.