Atsuya Miki1, Naoyuki Maeda2, Tomoko Asai2, Yasushi Ikuno2, Kohji Nishida2. 1. Department of Ophthalmology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-2 Yamada-Oka, Suita, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan. amiki@ophthal.med.osaka-u.ac.jp. 2. Department of Ophthalmology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-2 Yamada-Oka, Suita, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To evaluate the repeatability of corneal deformation parameters measured using a dynamic Scheimpflug analyzer and the impact of baseline clinical factors on the repeatability of each parameter. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective, cross-sectional study. METHODS: Forty-eight eyes (48 healthy subjects; mean age, 49.0 ± 19.5 years) underwent repeated examinations with the Scheimpflug analyzer to evaluate the test-retest variability. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and repeatability coefficient as indicators of variability were computed for 35 parameters measured with the Scheimpflug analyzer. The associations between the magnitude of the test-retest variability and baseline factors, such as age, axial length (AL), intraocular pressure (IOP), and central corneal thickness (CCT), were analyzed. RESULTS: The test-retest repeatability was excellent for 22 (62.9%) of 35 parameters (ICC ≥ 0.75), good for seven (20%), (ICC ≥ 0.6), fair for four (11.4%), (ICC ≥ 0.4), and poor for two (5.7%) parameters (ICC < 0.4). Age was associated positively with the magnitude of variability in 13 (37.1%) parameters; measurement variability was affected significantly by AL (5 parameters, 14.3%) and CCT (7 parameters, 20%) but, except for one parameter not by IOP. CONCLUSION: Most parameters of the dynamic Scheimpflug analyzer showed favorable measurement reliability in healthy subjects. However, six parameters showed poor-to-fair repeatability. Age, AL, and CCT significantly affected the repeatability of several parameters. These results should be considered when clinicians use this device in clinical practice.
PURPOSE: To evaluate the repeatability of corneal deformation parameters measured using a dynamic Scheimpflug analyzer and the impact of baseline clinical factors on the repeatability of each parameter. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective, cross-sectional study. METHODS: Forty-eight eyes (48 healthy subjects; mean age, 49.0 ± 19.5 years) underwent repeated examinations with the Scheimpflug analyzer to evaluate the test-retest variability. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and repeatability coefficient as indicators of variability were computed for 35 parameters measured with the Scheimpflug analyzer. The associations between the magnitude of the test-retest variability and baseline factors, such as age, axial length (AL), intraocular pressure (IOP), and central corneal thickness (CCT), were analyzed. RESULTS: The test-retest repeatability was excellent for 22 (62.9%) of 35 parameters (ICC ≥ 0.75), good for seven (20%), (ICC ≥ 0.6), fair for four (11.4%), (ICC ≥ 0.4), and poor for two (5.7%) parameters (ICC < 0.4). Age was associated positively with the magnitude of variability in 13 (37.1%) parameters; measurement variability was affected significantly by AL (5 parameters, 14.3%) and CCT (7 parameters, 20%) but, except for one parameter not by IOP. CONCLUSION: Most parameters of the dynamic Scheimpflug analyzer showed favorable measurement reliability in healthy subjects. However, six parameters showed poor-to-fair repeatability. Age, AL, and CCT significantly affected the repeatability of several parameters. These results should be considered when clinicians use this device in clinical practice.
Authors: Mauro T Leite; Luciana M Alencar; Charlotte Gore; Robert N Weinreb; Pamela A Sample; Linda M Zangwill; Felipe A Medeiros Journal: Am J Ophthalmol Date: 2010-06-11 Impact factor: 5.258
Authors: Carlos V Gustavo De Moraes; Victoria Hill; Celso Tello; Jeffrey M Liebmann; Robert Ritch Journal: J Glaucoma Date: 2012 Apr-May Impact factor: 2.503
Authors: Anthony P Wells; David F Garway-Heath; Ali Poostchi; Tracey Wong; Kenneth C Y Chan; Nisha Sachdev Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2008-03-03 Impact factor: 4.799