Literature DB >> 25184052

Influence of segment width on plan quality for volumetric modulated arc based stereotactic body radiotherapy.

Karthikeyan Nithiyanantham1, Ganesh Kadirampatti Mani2, Vikraman Subramani1, Karrthick Karukkupalayam Palaniappan1, Mohanraj Uthiran3, Sennniandavar Vellengiri3, Sambasivaselli Raju3, Sanjay S Supe4, Tejinder Kataria3.   

Abstract

AIM: To study the influence of segment width on plan quality for volumetric modulated arc based stereotactic body radiotherapy.
BACKGROUND: The redundancy of modulation for regularly shaped small volume tumors results in creation of many small segments and an increase of monitor units, with a consequent prolongation of treatment and uncertainty in treatment delivery.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Six cases each in lung, abdomen and liver were taken for the study. For each case, three VMAT SBRT plans were generated with different penalties on minimum segment width of 0.5, 1.0 and 1.5 cm. A comparison was made on the metrics of dose volume histogram, dosimetric indices, monitor units (MUs) and delivery accuracy.
RESULTS: The mean reduction of total MUs when compared with 0.5 cm plan was observed as 12.7 ± 6.0% and 17.5 ± 7.2% for 1.0 cm and 1.5 cm of minimum segment width, respectively. The p value showed a significant degradation in dosimetric indices for 1.5 cm plans when compared with 0.5 cm and 1.0 cm plans. The average deviation of measured dose with TPS calculated was 3.0 ± 1.1%, 2.1 ± 0.84% and 1.8 ± 0.9% for 0.5, 1.0 and 1.5 cm, respectively. The calculated gamma index with pass criteria of 2% dose difference and 2 mm distance to agreement was 95.9 ± 2.8%, 96.5 ± 2.6% and 97.8 ± 1.6% as calculated for 0.5, 1.0 and 1.5 cm of penalties, respectively. In view of the trade off between delivery efficiency and plan quality, 1 cm minimum segment width plans showed an improvement.
CONCLUSIONS: VMAT SBRT plans with increased optimal value of minimum segment width showed better plan quality and delivery efficiency for stereotactic body radiotherapy.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Minimum segment width; Optimization; Small field measurements; VMAT SBRT

Year:  2014        PMID: 25184052      PMCID: PMC4150097          DOI: 10.1016/j.rpor.2014.03.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother        ISSN: 1507-1367


  24 in total

1.  Improved leaf sequencing reduces segments or monitor units needed to deliver IMRT using multileaf collimators.

Authors:  M Langer; V Thai; L Papiez
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  An optimization algorithm that incorporates IMRT delivery constraints.

Authors:  J Seco; P M Evans; S Webb
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2002-03-21       Impact factor: 3.609

3.  Smoothing intensity-modulated treatment delivery under hardware constraints.

Authors:  Lijun Ma
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  A new smoothing procedure to reduce delivery segments for static MLC-based IMRT planning.

Authors:  Xuepeng Sun; Ping Xia
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Stereotactic body radiation therapy for inoperable early stage lung cancer.

Authors:  Robert Timmerman; Rebecca Paulus; James Galvin; Jeffrey Michalski; William Straube; Jeffrey Bradley; Achilles Fakiris; Andrea Bezjak; Gregory Videtic; David Johnstone; Jack Fowler; Elizabeth Gore; Hak Choy
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2010-03-17       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  Promising clinical outcome of stereotactic body radiation therapy for patients with inoperable Stage I/II non-small-cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Tingyi Xia; Hongqi Li; Qingxuan Sun; Yingjie Wang; Naibin Fan; Yong Yu; Ping Li; Joe Y Chang
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2006-06-09       Impact factor: 7.038

7.  Reduction of IMRT beam complexity through the use of beam modulation penalties in the objective function.

Authors:  Martha M Matuszak; Edward W Larsen; Benedick A Fraass
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 4.071

8.  Penalization of aperture complexity in inversely planned volumetric modulated arc therapy.

Authors:  Kelly C Younge; Martha M Matuszak; Jean M Moran; Daniel L McShan; Benedick A Fraass; Donald A Roberts
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 4.071

9.  Clinical outcomes of a phase I/II study of 48 Gy of stereotactic body radiotherapy in 4 fractions for primary lung cancer using a stereotactic body frame.

Authors:  Yasushi Nagata; Kenji Takayama; Yukinori Matsuo; Yoshiki Norihisa; Takashi Mizowaki; Takashi Sakamoto; Masato Sakamoto; Michihide Mitsumori; Keiko Shibuya; Norio Araki; Shinsuke Yano; Masahiro Hiraoka
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2005-09-19       Impact factor: 7.038

10.  Biological-based optimization and volumetric modulated arc therapy delivery for stereotactic body radiation therapy.

Authors:  Quentin Diot; Brian Kavanagh; Robert Timmerman; Moyed Miften
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 4.071

View more
  4 in total

1.  Analyzing the performance of ArcCHECK diode array detector for VMAT plan.

Authors:  Rajesh Thiyagarajan; Arunai Nambiraj; Sujit Nath Sinha; Girigesh Yadav; Ashok Kumar; Vikraman Subramani
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2015-12-02

2.  Is Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy (SBRT) in lymph node oligometastatic patients feasible and effective?

Authors:  Barbara Alicja Jereczek-Fossa; Sara Ronchi; Roberto Orecchia
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2014-11-07

3.  Correlation Between Average Segment Width and Gamma Passing Rate as a Function of MLC Position Error in Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy.

Authors:  Young Min Moon; Sang Il Bae; Moo Jae Han; Wan Jeon; Tosol Yu; Chul Won Choi; Jin Young Kim
Journal:  Technol Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2021 Jan-Dec

4.  Optimization of Minimum Segment Width Parameter in the Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy Plan for Esophageal Cancer.

Authors:  Jun Hong; Ji-Hua Han; Hong-Lei Luo; Ya-Qi Song
Journal:  Int J Gen Med       Date:  2021-12-16
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.