Literature DB >> 28111916

A simulation study of methods for selecting subgroup-specific doses in phase 1 trials.

Satoshi Morita1, Peter F Thall2, Kentaro Takeda3,4.   

Abstract

Patient heterogeneity may complicate dose-finding in phase 1 clinical trials if the dose-toxicity curves differ between subgroups. Conducting separate trials within subgroups may lead to infeasibly small sample sizes in subgroups having low prevalence. Alternatively,it is not obvious how to conduct a single trial while accounting for heterogeneity. To address this problem,we consider a generalization of the continual reassessment method on the basis of a hierarchical Bayesian dose-toxicity model that borrows strength between subgroups under the assumption that the subgroups are exchangeable. We evaluate a design using this model that includes subgroup-specific dose selection and safety rules. A simulation study is presented that includes comparison of this method to 3 alternative approaches,on the basis of nonhierarchical models,that make different types of assumptions about within-subgroup dose-toxicity curves. The simulations show that the hierarchical model-based method is recommended in settings where the dose-toxicity curves are exchangeable between subgroups. We present practical guidelines for application and provide computer programs for trial simulation and conduct.
Copyright © 2017 John Wiley & Sons,Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bayesian study design; conditionally independent hierarchical model; continual reassessment method; phase 1 clinical trial; subgroup-specific dose-finding

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28111916      PMCID: PMC5352526          DOI: 10.1002/pst.1797

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pharm Stat        ISSN: 1539-1604            Impact factor:   1.894


  14 in total

1.  Phase I, dose-escalation study of BKM120, an oral pan-Class I PI3K inhibitor, in patients with advanced solid tumors.

Authors:  Johanna C Bendell; Jordi Rodon; Howard A Burris; Maja de Jonge; Jaap Verweij; Diana Birle; David Demanse; Stefan S De Buck; Qinhua C Ru; Malte Peters; Michael Goldbrunner; José Baselga
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-12-12       Impact factor: 44.544

2.  Determining the effective sample size of a parametric prior.

Authors:  Satoshi Morita; Peter F Thall; Peter Müller
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2007-08-30       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  Prior Effective Sample Size in Conditionally Independent Hierarchical Models.

Authors:  Satoshi Morita; Peter F Thall; Peter Müller
Journal:  Bayesian Anal       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 3.728

4.  Bridging continual reassessment method for phase I clinical trials in different ethnic populations.

Authors:  Suyu Liu; Haitao Pan; Jielai Xia; Qin Huang; Ying Yuan
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2015-01-28       Impact factor: 2.373

5.  Design and analysis of phase I clinical trials.

Authors:  B E Storer
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1989-09       Impact factor: 2.571

6.  Bivariate isotonic design for dose-finding with ordered groups.

Authors:  Anastasia Ivanova; Kai Wang
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2006-06-30       Impact factor: 2.373

7.  Patient-specific dose finding based on bivariate outcomes and covariates.

Authors:  Peter F Thall; Hoang Q Nguyen; Elihu H Estey
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2008-03-19       Impact factor: 2.571

8.  Effective sample size for computing prior hyperparameters in Bayesian phase I-II dose-finding.

Authors:  Peter F Thall; Richard C Herrick; Hoang Q Nguyen; John J Venier; J Clift Norris
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2014-09-01       Impact factor: 2.486

9.  Continual reassessment method for ordered groups.

Authors:  John O'Quigley; Xavier Paoletti
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 2.571

10.  Phase I, multicenter, open-label, dose-escalation study of sonidegib in Asian patients with advanced solid tumors.

Authors:  Hironobu Minami; Yuichi Ando; Brigette Buig Yue Ma; Jih- Hsiang Lee; Hiroyuki Momota; Yutaka Fujiwara; Leung Li; Koichi Fukino; Koji Ito; Takeshi Tajima; Asuka Mori; Chia-Chi Lin
Journal:  Cancer Sci       Date:  2016-09-24       Impact factor: 6.716

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Challenges, opportunities, and innovative statistical designs for precision oncology trials.

Authors:  Jun Yin; Shihao Shen; Qian Shi
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2022-09

2.  A Phase I-II Basket Trial Design to Optimize Dose-Schedule Regimes Based on Delayed Outcomes.

Authors:  Ruitao Lin; Peter F Thall; Ying Yuan
Journal:  Bayesian Anal       Date:  2020-03-28       Impact factor: 3.728

3.  A nonparametric Bayesian continual reassessment method in single-agent dose-finding studies.

Authors:  Niansheng Tang; Songjian Wang; Gen Ye
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2018-12-18       Impact factor: 4.615

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.