Literature DB >> 29975406

Statistical justification of expansion cohorts in phase 1 cancer trials.

Ali A Mokdad1,2,3, Xian-Jin Xie4, Hong Zhu2,5, David E Gerber2,5,6, Daniel F Heitjan3,5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Phase I cancer trials increasingly incorporate dose-expansion cohorts (DECs), reflecting a growing demand to acquire more information about investigational drugs. Protocols commonly fail to provide a sample-size justification or analysis plan for the DEC. In this study, we develop a statistical framework for the design of DECs.
METHODS: We assume the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) for the investigational drug has been identified in the dose-escalation stage of the trial. We use the 80% lower confidence bound and the 90% upper confidence bound for the response and toxicity rates, respectively, as decision thresholds for the dose-expansion stage. We calculate the operating characteristics with reference to prespecified minimum effective response rates and maximum safe DLT rates.
RESULTS: We apply our framework to specify a system of DEC plans. The design comprises three components: 1) the number of subjects enrolled at the MTD, 2) the minimum number of responses necessary to indicate provisional drug efficacy, and 3) the maximum number of dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) permitted to indicate drug safety. We demonstrate our method in an application to a cancer immunotherapy trial.
CONCLUSIONS: Our simple and practical tool enables creation of DEC designs that appropriately address the safety and efficacy objectives of the trial.
© 2018 American Cancer Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  design; dose expansion; dose-finding; efficacy; safety

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29975406      PMCID: PMC6108930          DOI: 10.1002/cncr.31577

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  31 in total

1.  Dose-finding designs for HIV studies.

Authors:  J O'Quigley; M D Hughes; T Fenton
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  A Bayesian evaluation of enrolling additional patients at the maximum tolerated dose in Phase I trials.

Authors:  Mithat Gönen
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 2.226

3.  Optimal two-stage designs for phase II clinical trials.

Authors:  R Simon
Journal:  Control Clin Trials       Date:  1989-03

4.  Approaches to phase 1 clinical trial design focused on safety, efficiency, and selected patient populations: a report from the clinical trial design task force of the national cancer institute investigational drug steering committee.

Authors:  S Percy Ivy; Lillian L Siu; Elizabeth Garrett-Mayer; Larry Rubinstein
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2010-03-09       Impact factor: 12.531

Review 5.  An overview of the optimal planning, design, and conduct of phase I studies of new therapeutics.

Authors:  Patricia M LoRusso; Scott A Boerner; Lesley Seymour
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2010-03-09       Impact factor: 12.531

6.  Bayesian sequential monitoring designs for single-arm clinical trials with multiple outcomes.

Authors:  P F Thall; R M Simon; E H Estey
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1995-02-28       Impact factor: 2.373

7.  A comparison of two phase I trial designs.

Authors:  E L Korn; D Midthune; T T Chen; L V Rubinstein; M C Christian; R M Simon
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1994-09-30       Impact factor: 2.373

8.  Phase I study of single-agent anti-programmed death-1 (MDX-1106) in refractory solid tumors: safety, clinical activity, pharmacodynamics, and immunologic correlates.

Authors:  Julie R Brahmer; Charles G Drake; Ira Wollner; John D Powderly; Joel Picus; William H Sharfman; Elizabeth Stankevich; Alice Pons; Theresa M Salay; Tracee L McMiller; Marta M Gilson; Changyu Wang; Mark Selby; Janis M Taube; Robert Anders; Lieping Chen; Alan J Korman; Drew M Pardoll; Israel Lowy; Suzanne L Topalian
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-06-01       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  The bivariate continual reassessment method. extending the CRM to phase I trials of two competing outcomes.

Authors:  Thomas M Braun
Journal:  Control Clin Trials       Date:  2002-06

Review 10.  Dose escalation methods in phase I cancer clinical trials.

Authors:  Christophe Le Tourneau; J Jack Lee; Lillian L Siu
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2009-05-12       Impact factor: 13.506

View more
  2 in total

1.  Pharmacokinetic-Pharmacometabolomic Approach in Early-Phase Clinical Trials: A Way Forward for Targeted Therapy in Type 2 Diabetes.

Authors:  Khim Boon Tee; Luqman Ibrahim; Najihah Mohd Hashim; Mohd Zuwairi Saiman; Zaril Harza Zakaria; Hasniza Zaman Huri
Journal:  Pharmaceutics       Date:  2022-06-15       Impact factor: 6.525

2.  Flexible, rule-based dose escalation: The cohort-sequence design.

Authors:  Shuang Li; Xian-Jin Xie; Daniel F Heitjan
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials Commun       Date:  2020-02-09
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.