Literature DB >> 25177597

3D Laparoscopy - Help or Hype; Initial Experience of A Tertiary Health Centre.

Diwakar Sahu1, Mittu John Mathew1, Prasanna Kumar Reddy2.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: To evaluate the advantages of 3D laparoscopy and compare its significance with conventional 2D laparoscopy during various operative procedures.
METHODS: During present study, two groups were formed. Group A included patients who were operated using 3D laparoscopic imaging and Group B consisted of operated patients by 2D laparoscopy. Operative performance of both the groups was compared in terms of operative time and quality of imaging.
RESULTS: Operative time interval for various procedures was significantly less in Group A as compared to Group B. Also, imaging quality was far superior with use of 3D imaging system especially in terms of depth perception.
CONCLUSION: Advantages of 3D laparoscopy are well appreciated during operative procedures as previously documented by other studies in training models.

Entities:  

Keywords:  3D imaging; 3D laparoscopy; Laparoscopic surgery

Year:  2014        PMID: 25177597      PMCID: PMC4149103          DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2014/8234.4543

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res        ISSN: 0973-709X


  9 in total

1.  3-D vision improves performance in a pelvic trainer.

Authors:  H T Tevaearai; X M Mueller; L K von Segesser
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 10.093

2.  Influence of three-dimensional vision on surgical telemanipulator performance.

Authors:  V Falk; D Mintz; J Grünenfelder; J I Fann; T A Burdon
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2001-09-04       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 3.  Perceptual aspects of two-dimensional and stereoscopic display techniques in endoscopic surgery: review and current problems.

Authors:  J Hofmeister; T G Frank; A Cuschieri; N J Wade
Journal:  Semin Laparosc Surg       Date:  2001-03

Review 4.  Possibilities and limitations of current stereo-endoscopy.

Authors:  U D A Mueller-Richter; A Limberger; P Weber; K W Ruprecht; W Spitzer; M Schilling
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2004-04-27       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  The effect of a second-generation 3D endoscope on the laparoscopic precision of novices and experienced surgeons.

Authors:  N Taffinder; S G Smith; J Huber; R C Russell; A Darzi
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Three-dimensional imaging improves surgical performance for both novice and experienced operators using the da Vinci Robot System.

Authors:  John C Byrn; Stefanie Schluender; Celia M Divino; John Conrad; Brooke Gurland; Edward Shlasko; Amir Szold
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 2.565

7.  Is it worth revisiting laparoscopic three-dimensional visualization? A validated assessment.

Authors:  Hitendra R H Patel; Maria-Jose Ribal; Manit Arya; Rohan Nauth-Misir; Jean V Joseph
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 2.649

8.  Three-dimensional vision enhances task performance independently of the surgical method.

Authors:  O J Wagner; M Hagen; A Kurmann; S Horgan; D Candinas; S A Vorburger
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-05-12       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  3-D video techniques in endoscopic surgery.

Authors:  H Becker; A Melzer; M O Schurr; G Buess
Journal:  Endosc Surg Allied Technol       Date:  1993-02
  9 in total
  24 in total

1.  Three-Dimensional (3D) Versus Two-Dimensional (2D) Laparoscopic Bariatric Surgery: a Single-Surgeon Prospective Randomized Comparative Study.

Authors:  Giuseppe Currò; Giuseppe La Malfa; Antonio Caizzone; Valentina Rampulla; Giuseppe Navarra
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 4.129

Review 2.  Three-dimensional versus two-dimensional vision in laparoscopy: a systematic review.

Authors:  Stine Maya Dreier Sørensen; Mona Meral Savran; Lars Konge; Flemming Bjerrum
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-04-04       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  3D visualization reduces operating time when compared to high-definition 2D in laparoscopic liver resection: a case-matched study.

Authors:  Vimalraj Velayutham; David Fuks; Takeo Nomi; Yoshikuni Kawaguchi; Brice Gayet
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-03-25       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  The use of 3D laparoscopic imaging systems in surgery: EAES consensus development conference 2018.

Authors:  Alberto Arezzo; Nereo Vettoretto; Nader K Francis; Marco Augusto Bonino; Nathan J Curtis; Daniele Amparore; Simone Arolfo; Manuel Barberio; Luigi Boni; Ronit Brodie; Nicole Bouvy; Elisa Cassinotti; Thomas Carus; Enrico Checcucci; Petra Custers; Michele Diana; Marilou Jansen; Joris Jaspers; Gadi Marom; Kota Momose; Beat P Müller-Stich; Kyokazu Nakajima; Felix Nickel; Silvana Perretta; Francesco Porpiglia; Francisco Sánchez-Margallo; Juan A Sánchez-Margallo; Marlies Schijven; Gianfranco Silecchia; Roberto Passera; Yoav Mintz
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-12-04       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Randomized, controlled trial comparing clinical outcomes of 3D and 2D laparoscopic surgery for gastric cancer: an interim report.

Authors:  Jun Lu; Chao-Hui Zheng; Hua-Long Zheng; Ping Li; Jian-Wei Xie; Jia-Bin Wang; Jian-Xian Lin; Qi-Yue Chen; Long-Long Cao; Mi Lin; Ru-Hong Tu; Chang-Ming Huang
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-11-08       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  What Are the Advantages of 3D Cameras in Gynaecological Laparoscopy?

Authors:  S Baum; M Sillem; J T Ney; A Baum; M Friedrich; J Radosa; K M Kramer; B Gronwald; S Gottschling; E F Solomayer; A Rody; R Joukhadar
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 2.915

Review 7.  Three-dimensional video-assisted thoracic surgery for pulmonary resections: an update.

Authors:  Duilio Divisi; Mirko Barone; Roberto Crisci
Journal:  J Vis Surg       Date:  2017-06-04

8.  Laparoscopic Appendectomy Performed by junior SUrgeonS: impact of 3D visualization on surgical outcome. Randomized multicentre clinical trial. (LAPSUS TRIAL).

Authors:  E Botteri; M Ortenzi; G Alemanno; A Giordano; E Travaglio; C Turolo; S Castiglioni; E Treppiedi; E Rosso; A Gattolin; V Caracino; P Prosperi; A Valeri; M Guerrieri; N Vettoretto
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2020-02-14       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Comparison of short-term surgical outcome between 3D and 2D laparoscopy surgery for gastrointestinal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Bochao Zhao; Wu Lv; Di Mei; Rui Luo; Shiyang Bao; Baojun Huang; Jie Lin
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2020-01-22       Impact factor: 3.445

10.  Age is highly associated with stereo blindness among surgeons: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Charlotte Fergo; Jakob Burcharth; Hans-Christian Pommergaard; Jacob Rosenberg
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-03-04       Impact factor: 4.584

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.