Literature DB >> 17656206

Is it worth revisiting laparoscopic three-dimensional visualization? A validated assessment.

Hitendra R H Patel1, Maria-Jose Ribal, Manit Arya, Rohan Nauth-Misir, Jean V Joseph.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Pure laparoscopic urologic surgery is becoming the standard of care for many urologic procedures. Training surgeons without any experience in the field is still a challenge. It is well recognized that two-dimensional optics causes difficulty for the novice. Thus, we assessed a new-generation, three-dimensional (3D) visualization system.
METHODS: Fifteen laparoscopically novice surgeons were asked to perform five validated laparoscopic training exercises using the two-dimensional and 3D systems in random order: (a) linear cutting and suturing; (b) curved cutting and suturing; (c) tubular suturing; (d) dorsal vein complex suturing simulation; and (e) urethrovesical anastomosis. The objective (time taken to complete the task versus the time needed by an expert) and subjective (accuracy on completion versus an expert's) scoring were performed independently by advanced laparoscopists. Statistical analysis was performed using the t test.
RESULTS: All tasks were completed by the participants. The statistical analysis revealed a trend toward improved task performance using 3D visualization.
CONCLUSIONS: Our preliminary testing has suggested that the new-generation, 3D system used will be helpful for developing skills in laparoscopy for the novice surgeon.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17656206     DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2007.03.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urology        ISSN: 0090-4295            Impact factor:   2.649


  23 in total

1.  Advanced stereoscopic projection technology significantly improves novice performance of minimally invasive surgical skills.

Authors:  R Smith; A Day; T Rockall; K Ballard; M Bailey; I Jourdan
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-01-11       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Three-dimensional vision enhances task performance independently of the surgical method.

Authors:  O J Wagner; M Hagen; A Kurmann; S Horgan; D Candinas; S A Vorburger
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-05-12       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Comparison of two- and three-dimensional camera systems in laparoscopic performance: a novel 3D system with one camera.

Authors:  Seong-Ho Kong; Byung-Mo Oh; Hongman Yoon; Hye Seong Ahn; Hyuk-Joon Lee; Sun Geun Chung; Norio Shiraishi; Seigo Kitano; Han-Kwang Yang
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-11-13       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  An assessment of the new generation three-dimensional high definition laparoscopic vision system on surgical skills: a randomized prospective study.

Authors:  Taner A Usta; Aysel Ozkaynak; Ebru Kovalak; Erdinc Ergul; M Murat Naki; Erdal Kaya
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-11-21       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 5.  Three-dimensional versus two-dimensional vision in laparoscopy: a systematic review.

Authors:  Stine Maya Dreier Sørensen; Mona Meral Savran; Lars Konge; Flemming Bjerrum
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-04-04       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  3D visualization reduces operating time when compared to high-definition 2D in laparoscopic liver resection: a case-matched study.

Authors:  Vimalraj Velayutham; David Fuks; Takeo Nomi; Yoshikuni Kawaguchi; Brice Gayet
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-03-25       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  3D presentation in surgery: a review of technology and adverse effects.

Authors:  Tianqi Wang; Bin Zheng
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2018-12-15

8.  The use of 3D laparoscopic imaging systems in surgery: EAES consensus development conference 2018.

Authors:  Alberto Arezzo; Nereo Vettoretto; Nader K Francis; Marco Augusto Bonino; Nathan J Curtis; Daniele Amparore; Simone Arolfo; Manuel Barberio; Luigi Boni; Ronit Brodie; Nicole Bouvy; Elisa Cassinotti; Thomas Carus; Enrico Checcucci; Petra Custers; Michele Diana; Marilou Jansen; Joris Jaspers; Gadi Marom; Kota Momose; Beat P Müller-Stich; Kyokazu Nakajima; Felix Nickel; Silvana Perretta; Francesco Porpiglia; Francisco Sánchez-Margallo; Juan A Sánchez-Margallo; Marlies Schijven; Gianfranco Silecchia; Roberto Passera; Yoav Mintz
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-12-04       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  A randomized prospective study comparing acquisition of laparoscopic skills in three-dimensional (3D) vs. two-dimensional (2D) laparoscopy.

Authors:  B Alaraimi; W El Bakbak; S Sarker; S Makkiyah; A Al-Marzouq; R Goriparthi; A Bouhelal; V Quan; B Patel
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 3.352

10.  Three-dimensional imaging improves surgical skill performance in a laparoscopic test model for both experienced and novice laparoscopic surgeons.

Authors:  Roy Mashiach; Vadym Mezhybovsky; Avinoam Nevler; Mordechai Gutman; Amitai Ziv; Marat Khaikin
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-06-25       Impact factor: 4.584

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.