Literature DB >> 22580874

Three-dimensional vision enhances task performance independently of the surgical method.

O J Wagner1, M Hagen, A Kurmann, S Horgan, D Candinas, S A Vorburger.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Within the next few years, the medical industry will launch increasingly affordable three-dimensional (3D) vision systems for the operating room (OR). This study aimed to evaluate the effect of two-dimensional (2D) and 3D visualization on surgical skills and task performance.
METHODS: In this study, 34 individuals with varying laparoscopic experience (18 inexperienced individuals) performed three tasks to test spatial relationships, grasping and positioning, dexterity, precision, and hand-eye and hand-hand coordination. Each task was performed in 3D using binocular vision for open performance, the Viking 3Di Vision System for laparoscopic performance, and the DaVinci robotic system. The same tasks were repeated in 2D using an eye patch for monocular vision, conventional laparoscopy, and the DaVinci robotic system.
RESULTS: Loss of 3D vision significantly increased the perceived difficulty of a task and the time required to perform it, independently of the approach (P < 0.0001-0.02). Simple tasks took 25 % to 30 % longer to complete and more complex tasks took 75 % longer with 2D than with 3D vision. Only the difficult task was performed faster with the robot than with laparoscopy (P = 0.005). In every case, 3D robotic performance was superior to conventional laparoscopy (2D) (P < 0.001-0.015).
CONCLUSIONS: The more complex the task, the more 3D vision accelerates task completion compared with 2D vision. The gain in task performance is independent of the surgical method.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22580874     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-012-2295-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  40 in total

1.  Three-dimensional laparoscopy. Gadget or progress? A randomized trial on the efficacy of three-dimensional laparoscopy.

Authors:  M D Mueller; C Camartin; E Dreher; W Hänggi
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Dexterity enhancement with robotic surgery.

Authors:  K Moorthy; Y Munz; A Dosis; J Hernandez; S Martin; F Bello; T Rockall; A Darzi
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2004-04-06       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  The effect of a second-generation 3D endoscope on the laparoscopic precision of novices and experienced surgeons.

Authors:  N Taffinder; S G Smith; J Huber; R C Russell; A Darzi
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Video-assisted surgery represents more than a loss of three-dimensional vision.

Authors:  Anthony G Gallagher; E Matt Ritter; Andrew B Lederman; David A McClusky; C Daniel Smith
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 2.565

Review 5.  Laparoscopic versus open cholecystectomy for patients with symptomatic cholecystolithiasis.

Authors:  F Keus; J A F de Jong; H G Gooszen; C J H M van Laarhoven
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2006-10-18

6.  Advantages of advanced laparoscopic systems.

Authors:  J Heemskerk; R Zandbergen; J G Maessen; J W M Greve; N D Bouvy
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2006-03-09       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  The influence of three-dimensional video systems on laparoscopic task performance.

Authors:  D B Jones; J D Brewer; N J Soper
Journal:  Surg Laparosc Endosc       Date:  1996-06

8.  The surgical learning curve for laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Andrew J Vickers; Caroline J Savage; Marcel Hruza; Ingolf Tuerk; Philippe Koenig; Luis Martínez-Piñeiro; Gunther Janetschek; Bertrand Guillonneau
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2009-04-01       Impact factor: 41.316

Review 9.  Feasibility of complex minimally invasive surgery in neonates.

Authors:  Chandrasen K Sinha; Saravanakumar Paramalingam; Shailesh Patel; Mark Davenport; Niyi Ade-Ajayi
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2009-01-21       Impact factor: 1.827

10.  Evaluation of three laparoscopic modalities: robotics versus three-dimensional vision laparoscopy versus standard laparoscopy.

Authors:  Chad A LaGrange; Curtis J Clark; Eric W Gerber; Stephen E Strup
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 2.942

View more
  43 in total

1.  High-definition resolution three-dimensional imaging systems in laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: randomized comparative study with high-definition resolution two-dimensional systems.

Authors:  Hidefumi Kinoshita; Ken Nakagawa; Yukio Usui; Masatsugu Iwamura; Akihiro Ito; Akira Miyajima; Akio Hoshi; Yoichi Arai; Shiro Baba; Tadashi Matsuda
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-11-01       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  An assessment of the new generation three-dimensional high definition laparoscopic vision system on surgical skills: a randomized prospective study.

Authors:  Taner A Usta; Aysel Ozkaynak; Ebru Kovalak; Erdinc Ergul; M Murat Naki; Erdal Kaya
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-11-21       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Is a robotic system really better than the three-dimensional laparoscopic system in terms of suturing performance?: comparison among operators with different levels of experience.

Authors:  Young Suk Park; Aung Myint Oo; Sang-Yong Son; Dong Joon Shin; Do Hyun Jung; Sang-Hoon Ahn; Do Joong Park; Hyung-Ho Kim
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-07-03       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Improved depth perception with three-dimensional auxiliary display and computer generated three-dimensional panoramic overviews in robot-assisted laparoscopy.

Authors:  Fokko P Wieringa; Henri Bouma; Pieter T Eendebak; Jean-Paul A van Basten; Harrie P Beerlage; Geert A H J Smits; Jelte E Bos
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2014-05-16

Review 5.  Three-dimensional versus two-dimensional vision in laparoscopy: a systematic review.

Authors:  Stine Maya Dreier Sørensen; Mona Meral Savran; Lars Konge; Flemming Bjerrum
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-04-04       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  3D visualization reduces operating time when compared to high-definition 2D in laparoscopic liver resection: a case-matched study.

Authors:  Vimalraj Velayutham; David Fuks; Takeo Nomi; Yoshikuni Kawaguchi; Brice Gayet
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-03-25       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Comparison of 3D endoscopy and conventional 2D endoscopy in gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection: an ex vivo animal study.

Authors:  Kosuke Nomura; Daisuke Kikuchi; Mitsuru Kaise; Toshiro Iizuka; Yorinari Ochiai; Yugo Suzuki; Yumiko Fukuma; Masami Tanaka; Yosuke Okamoto; Satoshi Yamashita; Akira Matsui; Toshifumi Mitani; Shu Hoteya
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2019-03-06       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  The use of 3D laparoscopic imaging systems in surgery: EAES consensus development conference 2018.

Authors:  Alberto Arezzo; Nereo Vettoretto; Nader K Francis; Marco Augusto Bonino; Nathan J Curtis; Daniele Amparore; Simone Arolfo; Manuel Barberio; Luigi Boni; Ronit Brodie; Nicole Bouvy; Elisa Cassinotti; Thomas Carus; Enrico Checcucci; Petra Custers; Michele Diana; Marilou Jansen; Joris Jaspers; Gadi Marom; Kota Momose; Beat P Müller-Stich; Kyokazu Nakajima; Felix Nickel; Silvana Perretta; Francesco Porpiglia; Francisco Sánchez-Margallo; Juan A Sánchez-Margallo; Marlies Schijven; Gianfranco Silecchia; Roberto Passera; Yoav Mintz
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-12-04       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Randomized, controlled trial comparing clinical outcomes of 3D and 2D laparoscopic surgery for gastric cancer: an interim report.

Authors:  Jun Lu; Chao-Hui Zheng; Hua-Long Zheng; Ping Li; Jian-Wei Xie; Jia-Bin Wang; Jian-Xian Lin; Qi-Yue Chen; Long-Long Cao; Mi Lin; Ru-Hong Tu; Chang-Ming Huang
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-11-08       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  What Are the Advantages of 3D Cameras in Gynaecological Laparoscopy?

Authors:  S Baum; M Sillem; J T Ney; A Baum; M Friedrich; J Radosa; K M Kramer; B Gronwald; S Gottschling; E F Solomayer; A Rody; R Joukhadar
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 2.915

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.