Literature DB >> 28190888

What Are the Advantages of 3D Cameras in Gynaecological Laparoscopy?

S Baum1, M Sillem2, J T Ney3, A Baum4, M Friedrich5, J Radosa6, K M Kramer7, B Gronwald8, S Gottschling9, E F Solomayer3, A Rody10, R Joukhadar11.   

Abstract

Introduction Minimally invasive operative techniques are being used increasingly in gynaecological surgery. The expansion of the laparoscopic operation spectrum is in part the result of improved imaging. This study investigates the practical advantages of using 3D cameras in routine surgical practice. Materials and Methods Two different 3-dimensional camera systems were compared with a 2-dimensional HD system; the operating surgeon's experiences were documented immediately postoperatively using a questionnaire. Results Significant advantages were reported for suturing and cutting of anatomical structures when using the 3D compared to 2D camera systems. There was only a slight advantage for coagulating. The use of 3D cameras significantly improved the general operative visibility and in particular the representation of spacial depth compared to 2-dimensional images. There was not a significant advantage for image width. Depiction of adhesions and retroperitoneal neural structures was significantly improved by the stereoscopic cameras, though this did not apply to blood vessels, ureter, uterus or ovaries. Conclusion 3-dimensional cameras were particularly advantageous for the depiction of fine anatomical structures due to improved spacial depth representation compared to 2D systems. 3D cameras provide the operating surgeon with a monitor image that more closely resembles actual anatomy, thus simplifying laparoscopic procedures.

Entities:  

Keywords:  3D; advantage; clinical use; laparoscopy

Year:  2017        PMID: 28190888      PMCID: PMC5292906          DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-120845

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd        ISSN: 0016-5751            Impact factor:   2.915


  44 in total

1.  The effect of high-definition imaging on surgical task efficiency in minimally invasive surgery: an experimental comparison between three-dimensional imaging and direct vision through a stereoscopic TEM rectoscope.

Authors:  P van Bergen; W Kunert; G F Buess
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Three-dimensional laparoscopy. Gadget or progress? A randomized trial on the efficacy of three-dimensional laparoscopy.

Authors:  M D Mueller; C Camartin; E Dreher; W Hänggi
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  The effect of a second-generation 3D endoscope on the laparoscopic precision of novices and experienced surgeons.

Authors:  N Taffinder; S G Smith; J Huber; R C Russell; A Darzi
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 4.  Laparoscopic versus open cholecystectomy for patients with symptomatic cholecystolithiasis.

Authors:  F Keus; J A F de Jong; H G Gooszen; C J H M van Laarhoven
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2006-10-18

5.  Three-dimensional vision enhances task performance independently of the surgical method.

Authors:  O J Wagner; M Hagen; A Kurmann; S Horgan; D Candinas; S A Vorburger
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-05-12       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  A randomized prospective study comparing acquisition of laparoscopic skills in three-dimensional (3D) vs. two-dimensional (2D) laparoscopy.

Authors:  B Alaraimi; W El Bakbak; S Sarker; S Makkiyah; A Al-Marzouq; R Goriparthi; A Bouhelal; V Quan; B Patel
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 3.352

7.  Comparative evaluation of HD 2D/3D laparoscopic monitors and benchmarking to a theoretically ideal 3D pseudodisplay: even well-experienced laparoscopists perform better with 3D.

Authors:  D Wilhelm; S Reiser; N Kohn; M Witte; U Leiner; L Mühlbach; D Ruschin; W Reiner; H Feussner
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-03-21       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Comparison of direct vision and electronic two- and three-dimensional display systems on surgical task efficiency in endoscopic surgery.

Authors:  G Crosthwaite; T Chung; P Dunkley; S Shimi; A Cuschieri
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 6.939

9.  Effect of passive polarizing three-dimensional displays on surgical performance for experienced laparoscopic surgeons.

Authors:  R Smith; K Schwab; A Day; T Rockall; K Ballard; M Bailey; I Jourdan
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2014-08-18       Impact factor: 6.939

10.  Ergonomics in laparoscopic surgery.

Authors:  Avinash N Supe; Gaurav V Kulkarni; Pradnya A Supe
Journal:  J Minim Access Surg       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 1.407

View more
  3 in total

1.  A Pilot Study for a Better Visibility in the 3D Laparoscopic Right Colectomy Surgery.

Authors:  Lei Gu; Pei-Lin Liu; Hong Zhou; Qing Xu
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  Comparison of clinical outcomes and postoperative quality of life after surgical treatment of type II submucous myoma via laparoscopy or hysteroscopy.

Authors:  Rui-Chun Zhang; Wei Wu; Qing Zou; Hongmei Zhao
Journal:  J Int Med Res       Date:  2019-07-07       Impact factor: 1.671

3.  Large-Field-of-View Visualization with Small Blind Spots Utilizing Tilted Micro-Camera Array for Laparoscopic Surgery.

Authors:  Alex J Watras; Jae-Jun Kim; Jianwei Ke; Hewei Liu; Jacob A Greenberg; Charles P Heise; Yu Hen Hu; Hongrui Jiang
Journal:  Micromachines (Basel)       Date:  2020-05-10       Impact factor: 2.891

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.