Literature DB >> 25168812

Spatial resolution in CBCT machines for dental/maxillofacial applications-what do we know today?

D Brüllmann1, R K W Schulze.   

Abstract

Spatial resolution is one of the most important parameters objectively defining image quality, particularly in dental imaging, where fine details often have to be depicted. Here, we review the current status on assessment parameters for spatial resolution and on published data regarding spatial resolution in CBCT images. The current concepts of visual [line-pair (lp) measurements] and automated [modulation transfer function (MTF)] assessment of spatial resolution in CBCT images are summarized and reviewed. Published measurement data on spatial resolution in CBCT are evaluated and analysed. Effective (i.e. actual) spatial resolution available in CBCT images is being influenced by the two-dimensional detector, the three-dimensional reconstruction process, patient movement during the scan and various other parameters. In the literature, the values range between 0.6 and 2.8 lp mm(-1) (visual assessment; median, 1.7 lp mm(-1)) vs MTF (range, 0.5-2.3 cycles per mm; median, 2.1 lp mm(-1)). Spatial resolution of CBCT images is approximately one order of magnitude lower than that of intraoral radiographs. Considering movement, scatter effects and other influences in real-world scans of living patients, a realistic spatial resolution of just above 1 lp mm(-1) could be expected.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25168812      PMCID: PMC4614158          DOI: 10.1259/dmfr.20140204

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol        ISSN: 0250-832X            Impact factor:   2.419


  42 in total

1.  Accuracy of a simple method for deriving the presampled modulation transfer function of a digital radiographic system from an edge image.

Authors:  Egbert Buhr; Susanne Günther-Kohfahl; Ulrich Neitzel
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 2.  Flat-detector computed tomography (FD-CT).

Authors:  Willi A Kalender; Yiannis Kyriakou
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2007-06-23       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  A simple method for determining the modulation transfer function in digital radiography.

Authors:  H Fujita; D Y Tsai; T Itoh; K Doi; J Morishita; K Ueda; A Ohtsuka
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 10.048

4.  Cone beam CT: a current overview of devices.

Authors:  A Nemtoi; C Czink; D Haba; A Gahleitner
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 2.419

5.  The modulation transfer function and signal-to-noise ratio of different digital filters: a technical approach.

Authors:  D D Brüllmann; B d'Hoedt
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 2.419

6.  A quality assurance framework for the fully automated and objective evaluation of image quality in cone-beam computed tomography.

Authors:  Christian Steiding; Daniel Kolditz; Willi A Kalender
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 4.071

7.  Effects of undersampling on the proper interpretation of modulation transfer function, noise power spectra, and noise equivalent quanta of digital imaging systems.

Authors:  J T Dobbins
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 4.071

8.  Modulation transfer function of the EMI CT head scanner.

Authors:  C J Bischof; J C Ehrhardt
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1977 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 4.071

9.  The line spread function and modulation transfer function of a computed tomographic scanner.

Authors:  P F Judy
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1976 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 4.071

10.  A simplified approach for modulation transfer function determinations in computed tomography.

Authors:  E L Nickoloff; R Riley
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1985 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 4.071

View more
  45 in total

1.  Movement characteristics in young patients and the impact on CBCT image quality.

Authors:  Rubens Spin-Neto; Louise H Matzen; Lars Schropp; Erik Gotfredsen; Ann Wenzel
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2016-02-26       Impact factor: 2.419

2.  Can lithium disilicate ceramic crowns be fabricated on the basis of CBCT data?

Authors:  Ana Elisa Colle Kauling; Christine Keul; Kurt Erdelt; Jan Kühnisch; Jan-Frederik Güth
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2019-02-06       Impact factor: 3.573

3.  High isotropic resolution magnetic resonance imaging of the mandibular canal at 1.5 T: a comparison of gradient and spin echo sequences.

Authors:  Jakob Kreutner; Andreas Hopfgartner; Daniel Weber; Julian Boldt; Kurt Rottner; Ernst Richter; Peter Michael Jakob; Daniel Haddad
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2016-10-27       Impact factor: 2.419

Review 4.  Quality assurance phantoms for cone beam computed tomography: a systematic literature review.

Authors:  Marcus V L de Oliveira; Ann Wenzel; Paulo S F Campos; Rubens Spin-Neto
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2017-02-17       Impact factor: 2.419

5.  A new method to evaluate image quality of CBCT images quantitatively without observers.

Authors:  Yohei Takeshita; Mayumi Shimizu; Kazutoshi Okamura; Shoko Yoshida; Warangkana Weerawanich; Kenji Tokumori; Gainer R Jasa; Kazunori Yoshiura
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2017-02-17       Impact factor: 2.419

Review 6.  Technical aspects of dental CBCT: state of the art.

Authors:  R Pauwels; K Araki; J H Siewerdsen; S S Thongvigitmanee
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.419

7.  Development and Validation of Novel Three-Dimensional Craniofacial Landmarks on Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Scans.

Authors:  Denise K Liberton; Payal Verma; Anthony Contratto; Janice S Lee
Journal:  J Craniofac Surg       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 1.046

8.  An ex vivo study of automated motion artefact correction and the impact on cone beam CT image quality and interpretability.

Authors:  Rubens Spin-Neto; Louise H Matzen; Lars W Schropp; Thomas S Sørensen; Ann Wenzel
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2018-03-22       Impact factor: 2.419

9.  Spatial resolution measurements by Radia diagnostic software with SEDENTEXCT image quality phantom in cone beam CT for dental use.

Authors:  Hiroshi Watanabe; Yoshikazu Nomura; Ami Kuribayashi; Tohru Kurabayashi
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2017-12-07       Impact factor: 2.419

10.  Fiducial-based fusion of 3D dental models with magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Amir H Abdi; Alan G Hannam; Sidney Fels
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2018-04-16       Impact factor: 2.924

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.