Literature DB >> 25163822

The effect of local anatomy on the electric field induced by TMS: evaluation at 14 different target sites.

Arno M Janssen1, Thom F Oostendorp, Dick F Stegeman.   

Abstract

Many human cortical regions are targeted with transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). The stimulus intensity used for a certain region is generally based on the motor threshold stimulation intensity determined over the motor cortex (M1). However, it is well known that differences exist in coil-target distance and target site anatomy between cortical regions. These differences may well make the stimulation intensity derived from M1 sub-optimal for other regions. Our goal was to determine in what way the induced electric fields differ between cortical target regions. We used finite element method modeling to calculate the induced electric field for multiple target sites in a realistic head model. The effects on the electric field due to coil-target distance and target site anatomy have been quantified. The results show that a correction based on the distance alone does not correctly adjust the induced electric field for regions other than M1. In addition, a correction based solely on the TMS-induced electric field (primary field) does not suffice. A precise adjustment should include coil-target distance, the secondary field caused by charge accumulation at conductivity discontinuities and the direction of the field relative to the local cerebrospinal fluid-grey matter boundary.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25163822     DOI: 10.1007/s11517-014-1190-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput        ISSN: 0140-0118            Impact factor:   2.602


  42 in total

1.  Suppression of the motor cortex by magnetic stimulation of the cerebellum.

Authors:  A D Pinto; R Chen
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Computation of electric and magnetic stimulation in human head using the 3-D impedance method.

Authors:  Mohammad Nadeem; Thorleif Thorlin; Om P Gandhi; Mikael Persson
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 4.538

3.  Impact of the gyral geometry on the electric field induced by transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  Axel Thielscher; Alexander Opitz; Mirko Windhoff
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2010-08-01       Impact factor: 6.556

4.  A reconstruction of the conductive phenomena elicited by transcranial magnetic stimulation in heterogeneous brain tissue.

Authors:  Nicola Toschi; Tobias Welt; Maria Guerrisi; Martin E Keck
Journal:  Phys Med       Date:  2008-02-25       Impact factor: 2.685

Review 5.  Combining TMS and EEG offers new prospects in cognitive neuroscience.

Authors:  Carlo Miniussi; Gregor Thut
Journal:  Brain Topogr       Date:  2009-02-25       Impact factor: 3.020

6.  The electric field induced in the brain by magnetic stimulation: a 3-D finite-element analysis of the effect of tissue heterogeneity and anisotropy.

Authors:  Pedro C Miranda; Mark Hallett; Peter J Basser
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 4.538

7.  Physiological observations validate finite element models for estimating subject-specific electric field distributions induced by transcranial magnetic stimulation of the human motor cortex.

Authors:  Alexander Opitz; Wynn Legon; Abby Rowlands; Warren K Bickel; Walter Paulus; William J Tyler
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2013-05-01       Impact factor: 6.556

8.  3D modeling of the total electric field induced by transcranial magnetic stimulation using the boundary element method.

Authors:  F S Salinas; J L Lancaster; P T Fox
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2009-05-21       Impact factor: 3.609

Review 9.  The physiological basis of transcranial motor cortex stimulation in conscious humans.

Authors:  V Di Lazzaro; A Oliviero; F Pilato; E Saturno; M Dileone; P Mazzone; A Insola; P A Tonali; J C Rothwell
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 3.708

10.  Enhanced visual perception with occipital transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  Manon Mulckhuyse; Todd A Kelley; Jan Theeuwes; Vincent Walsh; Nilli Lavie
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2011-08-16       Impact factor: 3.386

View more
  11 in total

1.  The effect of tissue anisotropy on the radial and tangential components of the electric field in transcranial direct current stimulation.

Authors:  Mohamed K Metwally; Seung Moo Han; Tae-Seong Kim
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2015-05-05       Impact factor: 2.602

Review 2.  Targeting the Cerebellum by Noninvasive Neurostimulation: a Review.

Authors:  Kim van Dun; Florian Bodranghien; Mario Manto; Peter Mariën
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 3.847

3.  A generalized workflow for conducting electric field-optimized, fMRI-guided, transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  Nicholas L Balderston; Camille Roberts; Emily M Beydler; Zhi-De Deng; Thomas Radman; Bruce Luber; Sarah H Lisanby; Monique Ernst; Christian Grillon
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2020-09-30       Impact factor: 13.491

4.  Modulation of Resting Connectivity Between the Mesial Frontal Cortex and Basal Ganglia.

Authors:  Traian Popa; Laurel S Morris; Rachel Hunt; Zhi-De Deng; Silvina Horovitz; Karin Mente; Hitoshi Shitara; Kwangyeol Baek; Mark Hallett; Valerie Voon
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2019-06-05       Impact factor: 4.003

5.  Increased signal diversity/complexity of spontaneous EEG, but not evoked EEG responses, in ketamine-induced psychedelic state in humans.

Authors:  Nadine Farnes; Bjørn E Juel; André S Nilsen; Luis G Romundstad; Johan F Storm
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-11-23       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Fast computational optimization of TMS coil placement for individualized electric field targeting.

Authors:  Luis J Gomez; Moritz Dannhauer; Angel V Peterchev
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2020-12-30       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 7.  Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation as a potential treatment approach for cannabis use disorder.

Authors:  Tonisha Kearney-Ramos; Margaret Haney
Journal:  Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2021-03-04       Impact factor: 5.201

8.  Comparing TMS perturbations to occipital and parietal cortices in concurrent TMS-fMRI studies-Methodological considerations.

Authors:  Joana Leitão; Axel Thielscher; Johannes Tuennerhoff; Uta Noppeney
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-08-02       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Noninvasive Electric Current Induction for Low-Frequency Tissue Conductivity Reconstruction: Is It Feasible With a TMS-MRI Setup?

Authors:  Stefano Mandija; Petar I Petrov; Sebastian F W Neggers; Peter R Luijten; Cornelis A T van den Berg
Journal:  Tomography       Date:  2016-09

10.  Distinct Cerebellar regions for Body Motion Discrimination.

Authors:  Chiara Ferrari; Andrea Ciricugno; Lorella Battelli; Emily D Grossman; Zaira Cattaneo
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2019-12-10       Impact factor: 3.436

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.