Literature DB >> 25940845

The effect of tissue anisotropy on the radial and tangential components of the electric field in transcranial direct current stimulation.

Mohamed K Metwally1, Seung Moo Han1, Tae-Seong Kim2.   

Abstract

Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is considered to be a promising technique for noninvasive brain stimulation and brain disease therapy. Recent studies have investigated the distribution of the electric field (EF) magnitude over gyri and sulci and the effect of tissue homogeneity with isotropic electrical conductivities. However, it is well known that the skull and white matter (WM) are highly anisotropic electrically, requiring investigations of their anisotropic effects on the magnitude and the directional components of the induced EF due to the high dependency between neuromodulation and the EF direction. In this study, we investigated the effects of the skull and WM anisotropy on the radial and tangential components of the EF via gyri-specific high-resolution finite element head models. For tDCS, three configurations were investigated: the conventional rectangular pad electrode, a 4(cathodes) +1(anode) ring configuration, and a bilateral configuration. The results showed that the skull anisotropy has a crucial influence on the distribution of the radial EF component. The affected cortical regions by the radial EF were reduced about 22 % when considering the skull anisotropy in comparison with the regions with the skull isotropy. On the other hand, the WM anisotropy strongly alters the EF directionality, especially within the sulci. The electric current tends to flow radially to the cortical surface with the WM anisotropy. This effect increases the affected cortical areas by the radial EF component within the sulcal regions. Our results suggest that one must examine the distribution of the EF components in tDCS, not just the magnitude of the EF alone.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Finite element simulation; Neuromodulation; Transcranial direct current stimulation

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25940845     DOI: 10.1007/s11517-015-1301-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput        ISSN: 0140-0118            Impact factor:   2.602


  31 in total

1.  Excitability changes induced in the human motor cortex by weak transcranial direct current stimulation.

Authors:  M A Nitsche; W Paulus
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2000-09-15       Impact factor: 5.182

2.  Reduced spatial focality of electrical field in tDCS with ring electrodes due to tissue anisotropy.

Authors:  Hyun Sang Suh; Won Hee Lee; Young Sun Cho; Ji-Hwan Kim; Tae-Seong Kim
Journal:  Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc       Date:  2010

3.  Modeling the current distribution during transcranial direct current stimulation.

Authors:  Pedro Cavaleiro Miranda; Mikhail Lomarev; Mark Hallett
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2006-06-09       Impact factor: 3.708

4.  Noninvasive cortical stimulation with transcranial direct current stimulation in Parkinson's disease.

Authors:  Felipe Fregni; Paulo S Boggio; Marcelo C Santos; Moises Lima; Adriana L Vieira; Sergio P Rigonatti; M Teresa A Silva; Egberto R Barbosa; Michael A Nitsche; Alvaro Pascual-Leone
Journal:  Mov Disord       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 10.338

5.  Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) in a realistic head model.

Authors:  Rosalind J Sadleir; Tracy D Vannorsdall; David J Schretlen; Barry Gordon
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2010-03-27       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 6.  Computational and numerical methods for bioelectric field problems.

Authors:  C R Johnson
Journal:  Crit Rev Biomed Eng       Date:  1997

7.  Influence of anisotropic conductivity in the skull and white matter on transcranial direct current stimulation via an anatomically realistic finite element head model.

Authors:  Hyun Sang Suh; Won Hee Lee; Tae-Seong Kim
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2012-10-09       Impact factor: 3.609

8.  Single-layer skull approximations perform well in transcranial direct current stimulation modeling.

Authors:  Sumientra M Rampersad; Dick F Stegeman; Thom F Oostendorp
Journal:  IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng       Date:  2012-07-27       Impact factor: 3.802

9.  Transcranial direct current stimulation: a computer-based human model study.

Authors:  Tim Wagner; Felipe Fregni; Shirley Fecteau; Alan Grodzinsky; Markus Zahn; Alvaro Pascual-Leone
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2007-02-04       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 10.  Treatment of depression with transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS): a review.

Authors:  Michael A Nitsche; Paulo S Boggio; Felipe Fregni; Alvaro Pascual-Leone
Journal:  Exp Neurol       Date:  2009-04-05       Impact factor: 5.330

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Low intensity transcranial electric stimulation: Safety, ethical, legal regulatory and application guidelines.

Authors:  A Antal; I Alekseichuk; M Bikson; J Brockmöller; A R Brunoni; R Chen; L G Cohen; G Dowthwaite; J Ellrich; A Flöel; F Fregni; M S George; R Hamilton; J Haueisen; C S Herrmann; F C Hummel; J P Lefaucheur; D Liebetanz; C K Loo; C D McCaig; C Miniussi; P C Miranda; V Moliadze; M A Nitsche; R Nowak; F Padberg; A Pascual-Leone; W Poppendieck; A Priori; S Rossi; P M Rossini; J Rothwell; M A Rueger; G Ruffini; K Schellhorn; H R Siebner; Y Ugawa; A Wexler; U Ziemann; M Hallett; W Paulus
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-06-19       Impact factor: 3.708

Review 2.  Inter-Individual Variability in tDCS Effects: A Narrative Review on the Contribution of Stable, Variable, and Contextual Factors.

Authors:  Alessandra Vergallito; Sarah Feroldi; Alberto Pisoni; Leonor J Romero Lauro
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2022-04-20

3.  In vivo Measurements of Electric Fields During Cranial Electrical Stimulation in the Human Brain.

Authors:  Minmin Wang; Tao Feng; Hongjie Jiang; Junming Zhu; Wuwei Feng; Pratik Y Chhatbar; Jianmin Zhang; Shaomin Zhang
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2022-02-18       Impact factor: 3.169

4.  Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) over vmPFC modulates interactions between reward and emotion in delay discounting.

Authors:  Aurélie L Manuel; Nicholas W G Murray; Olivier Piguet
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-12-10       Impact factor: 4.379

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.