Literature DB >> 12848358

Computation of electric and magnetic stimulation in human head using the 3-D impedance method.

Mohammad Nadeem1, Thorleif Thorlin, Om P Gandhi, Mikael Persson.   

Abstract

A comparative, computational study of the modeling of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) is presented using a human head model. The magnetic fields from a typical TMS coil of figure-eight type is modeled using the Biot-Savart law. The TMS coil is placed in a position used clinically for treatment of depression. Induced current densities and electric field distributions are calculated in the model using the impedance method. The calculations are made using driving currents and wave forms typical in the clinical setting. The obtained results are compared and contrasted with the corresponding ECT results. In the ECT case, a uniform current density is injected on one side of the head and extracted from the equal area on the opposite side of the head. The area of the injected currents corresponds to the electrode placement used in the clinic. The currents and electric fields, thus, produced within the model are computed using the same three-dimensional impedance method as used for the TMS case. The ECT calculations are made using currents and wave forms typical in the clinic. The electrical tissue properties are obtained from a 4-Cole-Cole model. The numerical results obtained are shown on a two-dimenaional cross section of the model. In this study, we find that the current densities and electric fields in the ECT case are stronger and deeper penetrating than the corresponding TMS quantities but both methods show biologically interesting current levels deep inside the brain.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12848358     DOI: 10.1109/TBME.2003.813548

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng        ISSN: 0018-9294            Impact factor:   4.538


  23 in total

Review 1.  Fundamentals of transcranial electric and magnetic stimulation dose: definition, selection, and reporting practices.

Authors:  Angel V Peterchev; Timothy A Wagner; Pedro C Miranda; Michael A Nitsche; Walter Paulus; Sarah H Lisanby; Alvaro Pascual-Leone; Marom Bikson
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2011-11-01       Impact factor: 8.955

2.  Gyri-precise head model of transcranial direct current stimulation: improved spatial focality using a ring electrode versus conventional rectangular pad.

Authors:  Abhishek Datta; Varun Bansal; Julian Diaz; Jinal Patel; Davide Reato; Marom Bikson
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 8.955

3.  Predicted current densities in the brain during transcranial electrical stimulation.

Authors:  R N Holdefer; R Sadleir; M J Russell
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2006-04-27       Impact factor: 3.708

4.  Numerical modeling of magnetic induction tomography using the impedance method.

Authors:  Airton Ramos; Julia G B Wolff
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2011-01-13       Impact factor: 2.602

Review 5.  The development and modelling of devices and paradigms for transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  Stefan M Goetz; Zhi-De Deng
Journal:  Int Rev Psychiatry       Date:  2017-04-26

6.  The effect of local anatomy on the electric field induced by TMS: evaluation at 14 different target sites.

Authors:  Arno M Janssen; Thom F Oostendorp; Dick F Stegeman
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2014-08-28       Impact factor: 2.602

7.  Regional electric field induced by electroconvulsive therapy in a realistic finite element head model: influence of white matter anisotropic conductivity.

Authors:  Won Hee Lee; Zhi-De Deng; Tae-Seong Kim; Andrew F Laine; Sarah H Lisanby; Angel V Peterchev
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2011-10-18       Impact factor: 6.556

8.  Optimization of data coils in a multiband wireless link for neuroprosthetic implantable devices.

Authors:  M Ghovanloo
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Circuits Syst       Date:  2010-06-14       Impact factor: 3.833

9.  Neuroplastic changes following rehabilitative training correlate with regional electrical field induced with tDCS.

Authors:  M A Halko; A Datta; E B Plow; J Scaturro; M Bikson; L B Merabet
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2011-05-18       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 10.  Safety, ethical considerations, and application guidelines for the use of transcranial magnetic stimulation in clinical practice and research.

Authors:  Simone Rossi; Mark Hallett; Paolo M Rossini; Alvaro Pascual-Leone
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-10-14       Impact factor: 3.708

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.