Literature DB >> 2516369

Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy. Results in 316 patients and review of literature.

R E Miller1, B Castlemain, F J Lacqua, D P Kotler.   

Abstract

Three hundred and sixteen patients underwent 330 percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomies (PEG) of the Russell or introducer type. Seventy-five percent of the patients had neurological conditions that precluded swallowing. Absolute contraindications included pharyngeal or esophageal obstruction, uncorrectable coagulopathy or inability to perform endoscopy. The mean age of the patients was 75 years. The procedure took an average of 17.5 min to perform. PEG could not be performed in 14 patients (4.1%). Major complications occurred in 2.1% of patients, including 5 who developed peritonitis. No infections occurred at the gastrostomy tube site. The procedure mortality was 0.6%. PEG never required general anesthesia. For patients with long-term swallowing abnormalities, PEG is preferred to nasogastric feeding, operative gastrostomy or parenteral alimentation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2516369     DOI: 10.1007/bf02171543

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  26 in total

1.  Percutaneous reestablishment of feeding gastrostomies.

Authors:  B A Sacks; D J Glotzer
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  1979-05       Impact factor: 3.982

Review 2.  Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomies: a prospective evaluation and review of the literature.

Authors:  D F Kirby; R M Craig; T K Tsang; B H Plotnick
Journal:  JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr       Date:  1986 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 4.016

3.  Combined tracheostomy and percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy.

Authors:  F A Slezak; W H Kofol
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1987-09       Impact factor: 2.565

4.  The Russell percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy: key technical steps.

Authors:  R E Miller; W P Winkler; D P Kotler
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  1988 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 9.427

5.  Necrotizing fasciitis following percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy.

Authors:  D R Cave; W R Robinson; E A Brotschi
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  1986-08       Impact factor: 9.427

6.  Experimental trocar gastrostomy.

Authors:  M E Jascalevich
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  1967-09       Impact factor: 3.982

7.  Weaning and growth of artificially reared rats.

Authors:  W G Hall
Journal:  Science       Date:  1975-12-26       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy. Indications, success, complications, and mortality in 314 consecutive patients.

Authors:  D E Larson; D D Burton; K W Schroeder; E P DiMagno
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1987-07       Impact factor: 22.682

9.  Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy. Procedure of choice.

Authors:  R E Miller; B A Kummer; H I Tiszenkel; D P Kotler
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1986-11       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  Comparison of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy with surgical gastrostomy at a community hospital.

Authors:  J S Stern
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  1986-12       Impact factor: 10.864

View more
  18 in total

1.  Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy after abdominal surgery.

Authors:  E Eleftheriadis; K Kotzampassi
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 2.  Enteral nutrition access devices.

Authors:  A Habib; D F Kirby
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  1999-08

3.  Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy in elderly patients.

Authors:  M Z Panos; A Moran; D E Stableforth; I Chesner
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 2.401

4.  Complication rate lower after percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy than after surgical gastrostomy: a prospective, randomized trial.

Authors:  M Ljungdahl; M Sundbom
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2006-07-24       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  [PEG tube placement in German geriatric wards - a retrospective data-base analysis].

Authors:  R Wirth; D Volkert; J M Bauer; R J Schulz; M Borchelt; C Fleischhauer; E Steinhagen-Thiessen; C C Sieber
Journal:  Z Gerontol Geriatr       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 1.281

Review 6.  Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy in children.

Authors:  Wael El-Matary
Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 3.522

7.  Long-term outcomes of patients receiving percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tubes.

Authors:  L Rabeneck; N P Wray; N J Petersen
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 5.128

8.  Enteral long-term nutrition via percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) in 210 patients: a four-year prospective study.

Authors:  C Löser; S Wolters; U R Fölsch
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 3.199

9.  Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy in elderly patients.

Authors:  P Finucane; S M Aslan; D Duncan
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  1991-04       Impact factor: 2.401

10.  Use of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tubes in burn patients.

Authors:  M L Patton; L R Haith; T J Germain; W T Goldman; J T Raymond
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 4.584

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.