Literature DB >> 3788925

Comparison of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy with surgical gastrostomy at a community hospital.

J S Stern.   

Abstract

The results of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomies in 100 patients in a community hospital were compared with those of surgically placed gastrostomies in 50 patients. The morbidity rate for the percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy group was 4%, compared with 30% for the patients with surgically placed gastrostomies. The procedure-related mortality for percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy was 1%, compared with 16% for surgically placed gastrostomies. Patients admitted to the hospital for percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy stayed an average of 4 days compared with 10 days for the surgical patients; 14 patients had the percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy performed as an outpatient procedure. There were no complications in this group, suggesting that percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy can be safely performed as an outpatient. In this community hospital, percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy was both substantially safer and far less expensive than surgically placed gastrostomy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3788925

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 0002-9270            Impact factor:   10.864


  10 in total

1.  Tract formation following percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy in an animal model.

Authors:  J D Mellinger; I B Simon; B Schlechter; R H Lash; J L Ponsky
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Extrusion of PEG tube from the stomach with fistula formation: an unusual complication of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy.

Authors:  P Goodman; M S Levine; H P Parkman
Journal:  Gastrointest Radiol       Date:  1991

3.  Comparison of fluoroscopy-guided Pull-type percutaneous radiological gastrostomy (Pull-type-PRG) with conventional percutaneous radiological gastrostomy (Push-type-PRG): clinical results in 253 patients.

Authors:  Yang Yang; J Schneider; C Düber; M B Pitton
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2011-07-09       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 4.  Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy. Results in 316 patients and review of literature.

Authors:  R E Miller; B Castlemain; F J Lacqua; D P Kotler
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy in head and neck cancer patients.

Authors:  J G Hunter; L Lauretano; P C Shellito
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1989-07       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 6.  A descriptive review of the factors contributing to nutritional compromise in patients with head and neck cancer.

Authors:  Martin R Chasen; Ravi Bhargava
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2009-07-18       Impact factor: 3.603

7.  PEG ileus. A preventable complication.

Authors:  K H Mutabagani; M C Townsend; M W Arnold
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube removal and replacement after "buried bumper syndrome": the simple way.

Authors:  P Turner; M Deakin
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-01-01       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Comparing open gastrostomy tube to percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube in heart transplant patients.

Authors:  Vishnu Ambur; Sharven Taghavi; Senthil Jayarajan; John Gaughan; Yoshiya Toyoda; Elizabeth Dauer; Lars Ola Sjoholm; Abhijit Pathak; Thomas Santora; Amy J Goldberg
Journal:  Ann Med Surg (Lond)       Date:  2016-03-19

10.  SURGICAL GASTROSTOMY BASED ON ENDOSCOPIC CONCEPTS.

Authors:  Emmanuel Conrado Souza
Journal:  Arq Bras Cir Dig       Date:  2016-03
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.