Literature DB >> 10980972

Enteral nutrition access devices.

A Habib1, D F Kirby.   

Abstract

During the past decade a concerted effort has been made to use enteral nutrition instead of parenteral nutrition for hospitalized patients. Enteral nutrition has major advantages over parenteral nutrition in terms of cost and fewer serious complications. A clinician interested in initiating enteral nutrition may be limited by a lack of familiarity with the variety of options for enteral access and the difficulty of choosing among them. This paper reviews the different enteral access routes and devices available to the clinician.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10980972     DOI: 10.1007/s11894-999-0121-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep        ISSN: 1522-8037


  45 in total

1.  Gastroesophageal reflux in intubated patients receiving enteral nutrition: effect of supine and semirecumbent positions.

Authors:  J Ibáñez; A Peñafiel; J M Raurich; P Marse; R Jordá; F Mata
Journal:  JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr       Date:  1992 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 4.016

Review 2.  American Gastroenterological Association technical review on tube feeding for enteral nutrition.

Authors:  D F Kirby; M H Delegge; C R Fleming
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 22.682

3.  Percutaneous drainage and feeding gastrostomies in 100 patients.

Authors:  F O'Keeffe; C H Carrasco; C Charnsangavej; W R Richli; S Wallace; R S Freedman
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1989-08       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 4.  Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy. Results in 316 patients and review of literature.

Authors:  R E Miller; B Castlemain; F J Lacqua; D P Kotler
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Percutaneous endoscopic jejunostomy in cancer patients with previous gastric resection.

Authors:  M Shike; P Schroy; M A Ritchie; C J Lightdale; R Morse
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  1987-10       Impact factor: 9.427

6.  The buried bumper syndrome: a new technique for safe, endoscopic PEG removal.

Authors:  J W Boyd; M H DeLegge; R D Shamburek; D F Kirby
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 9.427

7.  Aspiration associated with long-term gastric versus jejunal feeding: a critical analysis of the literature.

Authors:  B A Lazarus; J B Murphy; L Culpepper
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  1990-01       Impact factor: 3.966

8.  Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy. Indications, success, complications, and mortality in 314 consecutive patients.

Authors:  D E Larson; D D Burton; K W Schroeder; E P DiMagno
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1987-07       Impact factor: 22.682

9.  Percutaneous feeding gastrostomy with the Seldinger technique: review of 252 patients.

Authors:  B K Halkier; C S Ho; A C Yee
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1989-05       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  Feeding gastrostomy button: experience and recommendations.

Authors:  M W Gauderer; M M Olsen; T A Stellato; M L Dokler
Journal:  J Pediatr Surg       Date:  1988-01       Impact factor: 2.545

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.