Literature DB >> 3083129

Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomies: a prospective evaluation and review of the literature.

D F Kirby, R M Craig, T K Tsang, B H Plotnick.   

Abstract

The results of the first 55 consecutive percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomies (PEGs) that were performed over an 18-month period in a tertiary care center are presented. We followed these cases prospectively to assess the morbidity, mortality, staff acceptance, short-and long-term complications, and cost effectiveness of the technique. Fifty-one (93%) were successful with no mortality. Long-term morbidity included 6/55 (11%) tube extrusions; 5/55 (9%) cellulitis around the catheter site; 5/55 (9%) aspiration pneumonias; and 2/55 (3.6%) clogged tubes requiring replacement. Morbidity was considered minor and easily dealt with in all but five instances (9%) where more prolonged treatment was required. A review of the literature including other techniques used for percutaneous gastrostomy is also presented. It is concluded that percutaneous gastrostomies are relatively safe, cost-effective, and should be given first consideration for long-term enteral therapy in appropriate patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3083129     DOI: 10.1177/0148607186010002155

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr        ISSN: 0148-6071            Impact factor:   4.016


  20 in total

1.  Concomitant placement of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy and jejunostomy.

Authors:  B V MacFadyen; R Ghobrial; M Catalano; I Raijman
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1992 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 2.  Endoscopic intervention for enteral access.

Authors:  T A Stellato
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1992 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 3.  Aspiration and the elderly.

Authors:  M J Feinberg; J Knebl; J Tully; L Segall
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 3.438

4.  Extrusion of PEG tube from the stomach with fistula formation: an unusual complication of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy.

Authors:  P Goodman; M S Levine; H P Parkman
Journal:  Gastrointest Radiol       Date:  1991

Review 5.  Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy. Results in 316 patients and review of literature.

Authors:  R E Miller; B Castlemain; F J Lacqua; D P Kotler
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Cost analysis of long-term feeding by percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy in cancer patients in an Italian health district.

Authors:  S Sartori; L Trevisani; D Tassinari; G Gilli; I Nielsen; A Maestri; V Abbasciano
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 3.603

Review 7.  Indications for tube feedings in elderly patients.

Authors:  J O Ciocon
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 3.438

8.  Comparison of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy with Stamm gastrostomy.

Authors:  J P Grant
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1988-05       Impact factor: 12.969

9.  Prevention of aspiration pneumonia during long-term feeding by percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy: might cisapride play any role? An open pilot study.

Authors:  S Sartori; L Trevisani; D Tassinari; I Nielsen; G Gilli; D Donati; P Malacarne
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 3.603

10.  Metastatic implantation of an oral squamous-cell carcinoma at a percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy site.

Authors:  P Sharma; S M Berry; K Wilson; H Neale; A S Fink
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 4.584

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.