Literature DB >> 7992177

Use of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tubes in burn patients.

M L Patton1, L R Haith, T J Germain, W T Goldman, J T Raymond.   

Abstract

Alimentation and decompression are imperative to the successful management of the severely burned patient. Utilization of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tubes for these purposes has become a proven effective procedure in non-burned patients with few major complications. We retrospectively reviewed placement of PEG tubes in 31 burn patients, some of whom had been admitted with additional diagnoses such as inhalation injury and/or dysphagia. In 90% of our burn patients, the use of PEG tubes was without complication. The placement of PEG tubes through burn wound areas or donor sites added no increase in wound complications. In summary, there was no mortality referable to the use of PEG tubes, there were no major operative or wound complications, and feedings were tolerated well. This study reports on the use of PEG tubes in a regional Burn Treatment Center. It shows that PEG tubes offer safe and effective alimentation and decompression in the management of burned patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7992177     DOI: 10.1007/BF00705721

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  16 in total

1.  Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy for postoperative rehabilitation after maxillofacial tumor surgery.

Authors:  J Koehler; K Buhl
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 2.789

Review 2.  Nutrition for adult burn patients: a review.

Authors:  C S Ireton-Jones; C R Baxter
Journal:  Nutr Clin Pract       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 3.080

Review 3.  Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy. What are the benefits, what are the risks?

Authors:  J DiLorenzo; B Dalton; P Miskovitz
Journal:  Postgrad Med       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 3.840

Review 4.  Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy. Results in 316 patients and review of literature.

Authors:  R E Miller; B Castlemain; F J Lacqua; D P Kotler
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Tube feeding. Providing the most nutrition with the least discomfort.

Authors:  R Cogen; J Weinryb
Journal:  Postgrad Med       Date:  1989-04       Impact factor: 3.840

6.  Percutaneous approaches to enteral alimentation.

Authors:  J L Ponsky; M W Gauderer; T A Stellato; A Aszodi
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1985-01       Impact factor: 2.565

7.  The efficacy and limitations of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy.

Authors:  W R Jarnagin; Q Y Duh; S J Mulvihill; J A Ridge; T R Schrock; L W Way
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1992-03

8.  Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy and early mortality.

Authors:  W K Clarkston; O J Smith; J M Walden
Journal:  South Med J       Date:  1990-12       Impact factor: 0.954

9.  Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy. Indications, success, complications, and mortality in 314 consecutive patients.

Authors:  D E Larson; D D Burton; K W Schroeder; E P DiMagno
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1987-07       Impact factor: 22.682

10.  Immediate enteral feeding in burn patients is safe and effective.

Authors:  W S McDonald; C W Sharp; E A Deitch
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 12.969

View more
  1 in total

1.  Feeding gastrostomy.

Authors:  P Lo Gerfo
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 4.584

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.