Literature DB >> 25160973

Poly peak parser: Method and software for identification of unknown indels using sanger sequencing of polymerase chain reaction products.

Jonathon T Hill1, Bradley L Demarest, Brent W Bisgrove, Yi-Chu Su, Megan Smith, H Joseph Yost.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Genome editing techniques, including ZFN, TALEN, and CRISPR, have created a need to rapidly screen many F1 individuals to identify carriers of indels and determine the sequences of the mutations. Current techniques require multiple clones of the targeted region to be sequenced for each individual, which is inefficient when many individuals must be analyzed. Direct Sanger sequencing of a polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplified region surrounding the target site is efficient, but Sanger sequencing genomes heterozygous for an indel results in a string of "double peaks" due to the mismatched region.
RESULTS: To facilitate indel identification, we developed an online tool called Poly Peak Parser (available at http://yost.genetics.utah.edu/software.php) that is able to separate chromatogram data containing ambiguous base calls into wild-type and mutant allele sequences. This tool allows the nature of the indel to be determined from a single sequencing run per individual performed directly on a PCR product spanning the targeted site, without cloning.
CONCLUSIONS: The method and algorithm described here facilitate rapid identification and sequence characterization of heterozygous mutant carriers generated by genome editing. Although designed for screening F1 individuals, this tool can also be used to identify heterozygous indels in many contexts.
© 2014 The Authors. Developmental Dynamics published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Association of Anatomists.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Sanger sequencing; genome editing; indel identification

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25160973      PMCID: PMC4525701          DOI: 10.1002/dvdy.24183

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dev Dyn        ISSN: 1058-8388            Impact factor:   3.780


  13 in total

1.  Targeted chromosomal cleavage and mutagenesis in Drosophila using zinc-finger nucleases.

Authors:  Marina Bibikova; Mary Golic; Kent G Golic; Dana Carroll
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Automating resequencing-based detection of insertion-deletion polymorphisms.

Authors:  Tushar R Bhangale; Matthew Stephens; Deborah A Nickerson
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2006-11-19       Impact factor: 38.330

3.  A tale of two templates: automatically resolving double traces has many applications, including efficient PCR-based elucidation of alternative splices.

Authors:  Aaron E Tenney; Jia Qian Wu; Laura Langton; Paul Klueh; Ralph Quatrano; Michael R Brent
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2007-01-08       Impact factor: 9.043

4.  PolyScan: an automatic indel and SNP detection approach to the analysis of human resequencing data.

Authors:  Ken Chen; Michael D McLellan; Li Ding; Michael C Wendl; Yumi Kasai; Richard K Wilson; Elaine R Mardis
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2007-04-06       Impact factor: 9.043

Review 5.  TALENs: a widely applicable technology for targeted genome editing.

Authors:  J Keith Joung; Jeffry D Sander
Journal:  Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2012-11-21       Impact factor: 94.444

6.  A TALE nuclease architecture for efficient genome editing.

Authors:  Jeffrey C Miller; Siyuan Tan; Guijuan Qiao; Kyle A Barlow; Jianbin Wang; Danny F Xia; Xiangdong Meng; David E Paschon; Elo Leung; Sarah J Hinkley; Gladys P Dulay; Kevin L Hua; Irina Ankoudinova; Gregory J Cost; Fyodor D Urnov; H Steve Zhang; Michael C Holmes; Lei Zhang; Philip D Gregory; Edward J Rebar
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2010-12-22       Impact factor: 54.908

7.  A rapid and efficient method of genotyping zebrafish mutants.

Authors:  John M Parant; Stephen A George; Rob Pryor; Carl T Wittwer; H Joseph Yost
Journal:  Dev Dyn       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 3.780

8.  An optimized two-finger archive for ZFN-mediated gene targeting.

Authors:  Ankit Gupta; Ryan G Christensen; Amy L Rayla; Abirami Lakshmanan; Gary D Stormo; Scot A Wolfe
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2012-04-29       Impact factor: 28.547

9.  Simple methods for generating and detecting locus-specific mutations induced with TALENs in the zebrafish genome.

Authors:  Timothy J Dahlem; Kazuyuki Hoshijima; Michael J Jurynec; Derrick Gunther; Colby G Starker; Alexandra S Locke; Allison M Weis; Daniel F Voytas; David Jonah Grunwald
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2012-08-16       Impact factor: 5.917

10.  Decoding of superimposed traces produced by direct sequencing of heterozygous indels.

Authors:  Dmitry A Dmitriev; Roman A Rakitov
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2008-07-25       Impact factor: 4.475

View more
  83 in total

1.  A Sorghum Mutant Resource as an Efficient Platform for Gene Discovery in Grasses.

Authors:  Yinping Jiao; John Burke; Ratan Chopra; Gloria Burow; Junping Chen; Bo Wang; Chad Hayes; Yves Emendack; Doreen Ware; Zhanguo Xin
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  2016-06-27       Impact factor: 11.277

2.  BEAT: A Python Program to Quantify Base Editing from Sanger Sequencing.

Authors:  Li Xu; Yakun Liu; Renzhi Han
Journal:  CRISPR J       Date:  2019-07-18

3.  A Python script to merge Sanger sequences.

Authors:  Cen Chen; Bingguo Lu; Xiaofang Huang; Chuyun Bi; Lili Zhao; Yunzhuo Hu; Xuanyang Chen; Shiqiang Lin; Kai Huang
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2021-04-27       Impact factor: 2.984

4.  Efficient, footprint-free human iPSC genome editing by consolidation of Cas9/CRISPR and piggyBac technologies.

Authors:  Gang Wang; Luhan Yang; Dennis Grishin; Xavier Rios; Lillian Y Ye; Yong Hu; Kai Li; Donghui Zhang; George M Church; William T Pu
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2016-12-08       Impact factor: 13.491

5.  Cross-Site Evaluation of Commercial Sanger Sequencing Chemistries.

Authors:  Jessica W Podnar; Lorena Pantano; Molly J Zeller; Fred W Kolling; Yanping Zhang; Yuriy O Alekseyev; Jeremy Niece; Heather Deiderick; Jun Fan; Xiaoling Xuei; Jan Kieleczawa; Stuart S Levine; Zachary T Herbert; Marie Adams
Journal:  J Biomol Tech       Date:  2020-09

6.  High-Throughput CRISPR/Cas9 Mutagenesis Streamlines Trait Gene Identification in Maize.

Authors:  Hai-Jun Liu; Liumei Jian; Jieting Xu; Qinghua Zhang; Maolin Zhang; Minliang Jin; Yong Peng; Jiali Yan; Baozhu Han; Jie Liu; Fan Gao; Xiangguo Liu; Lei Huang; Wenjie Wei; Yunxiu Ding; Xiaofeng Yang; Zhenxian Li; Mingliang Zhang; Jiamin Sun; Minji Bai; Wenhao Song; Hanmo Chen; Xi'ang Sun; Wenqiang Li; Yuming Lu; Ya Liu; Jiuran Zhao; Yangwen Qian; David Jackson; Alisdair R Fernie; Jianbing Yan
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  2020-02-25       Impact factor: 11.277

7.  CRISPR-directed mitotic recombination enables genetic mapping without crosses.

Authors:  Meru J Sadhu; Joshua S Bloom; Laura Day; Leonid Kruglyak
Journal:  Science       Date:  2016-05-05       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  GIPC proteins negatively modulate Plexind1 signaling during vascular development.

Authors:  Jorge Carretero-Ortega; Zinal Chhangawala; Shane Hunt; Carlos Narvaez; Javier Menéndez-González; Carl M Gay; Tomasz Zygmunt; Xiaochun Li; Jesús Torres-Vázquez
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2019-05-03       Impact factor: 8.140

9.  ZCWPW1 is recruited to recombination hotspots by PRDM9 and is essential for meiotic double strand break repair.

Authors:  Daniel Wells; Emmanuelle Bitoun; Daniela Moralli; Gang Zhang; Anjali Hinch; Julia Jankowska; Peter Donnelly; Catherine Green; Simon R Myers
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2020-08-03       Impact factor: 8.140

10.  Efficient introduction of specific homozygous and heterozygous mutations using CRISPR/Cas9.

Authors:  Dominik Paquet; Dylan Kwart; Antonia Chen; Andrew Sproul; Samson Jacob; Shaun Teo; Kimberly Moore Olsen; Andrew Gregg; Scott Noggle; Marc Tessier-Lavigne
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2016-04-27       Impact factor: 49.962

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.