Literature DB >> 27230379

CRISPR-directed mitotic recombination enables genetic mapping without crosses.

Meru J Sadhu1, Joshua S Bloom1, Laura Day2, Leonid Kruglyak1.   

Abstract

Linkage and association studies have mapped thousands of genomic regions that contribute to phenotypic variation, but narrowing these regions to the underlying causal genes and variants has proven much more challenging. Resolution of genetic mapping is limited by the recombination rate. We developed a method that uses CRISPR (clustered, regularly interspaced, short palindromic repeats) to build mapping panels with targeted recombination events. We tested the method by generating a panel with recombination events spaced along a yeast chromosome arm, mapping trait variation, and then targeting a high density of recombination events to the region of interest. Using this approach, we fine-mapped manganese sensitivity to a single polymorphism in the transporter Pmr1. Targeting recombination events to regions of interest allows us to rapidly and systematically identify causal variants underlying trait differences.
Copyright © 2016, American Association for the Advancement of Science.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27230379      PMCID: PMC4933295          DOI: 10.1126/science.aaf5124

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Science        ISSN: 0036-8075            Impact factor:   47.728


  34 in total

1.  Global analysis of protein localization in budding yeast.

Authors:  Won-Ki Huh; James V Falvo; Luke C Gerke; Adam S Carroll; Russell W Howson; Jonathan S Weissman; Erin K O'Shea
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2003-10-16       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  The Genome Analysis Toolkit: a MapReduce framework for analyzing next-generation DNA sequencing data.

Authors:  Aaron McKenna; Matthew Hanna; Eric Banks; Andrey Sivachenko; Kristian Cibulskis; Andrew Kernytsky; Kiran Garimella; David Altshuler; Stacey Gabriel; Mark Daly; Mark A DePristo
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2010-07-19       Impact factor: 9.043

3.  Introduction of DNA into yeast cells.

Authors:  D M Becker; V Lundblad
Journal:  Curr Protoc Mol Biol       Date:  2001-05

Review 4.  Genome editing. The new frontier of genome engineering with CRISPR-Cas9.

Authors:  Jennifer A Doudna; Emmanuelle Charpentier
Journal:  Science       Date:  2014-11-28       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  ATP-induced conformational changes of the nucleotide-binding domain of Na,K-ATPase.

Authors:  Mark Hilge; Gregg Siegal; Geerten W Vuister; Peter Güntert; Sergio M Gloor; Jan Pieter Abrahams
Journal:  Nat Struct Biol       Date:  2003-06

6.  Genealogy of principal strains of the yeast genetic stock center.

Authors:  R K Mortimer; J R Johnston
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1986-05       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  Gene editing of CCR5 in autologous CD4 T cells of persons infected with HIV.

Authors:  Pablo Tebas; David Stein; Winson W Tang; Ian Frank; Shelley Q Wang; Gary Lee; S Kaye Spratt; Richard T Surosky; Martin A Giedlin; Geoff Nichol; Michael C Holmes; Philip D Gregory; Dale G Ando; Michael Kalos; Ronald G Collman; Gwendolyn Binder-Scholl; Gabriela Plesa; Wei-Ting Hwang; Bruce L Levine; Carl H June
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2014-03-06       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Fast, scalable generation of high-quality protein multiple sequence alignments using Clustal Omega.

Authors:  Fabian Sievers; Andreas Wilm; David Dineen; Toby J Gibson; Kevin Karplus; Weizhong Li; Rodrigo Lopez; Hamish McWilliam; Michael Remmert; Johannes Söding; Julie D Thompson; Desmond G Higgins
Journal:  Mol Syst Biol       Date:  2011-10-11       Impact factor: 11.429

9.  Finding the sources of missing heritability in a yeast cross.

Authors:  Joshua S Bloom; Ian M Ehrenreich; Wesley T Loo; Thúy-Lan Võ Lite; Leonid Kruglyak
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2013-02-03       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  A CRISPR-Cas9 gene drive system targeting female reproduction in the malaria mosquito vector Anopheles gambiae.

Authors:  Andrew Hammond; Roberto Galizi; Kyros Kyrou; Alekos Simoni; Carla Siniscalchi; Dimitris Katsanos; Matthew Gribble; Dean Baker; Eric Marois; Steven Russell; Austin Burt; Nikolai Windbichler; Andrea Crisanti; Tony Nolan
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2015-12-07       Impact factor: 54.908

View more
  33 in total

1.  Adaptation by Loss of Heterozygosity in Saccharomyces cerevisiae Clones Under Divergent Selection.

Authors:  Timothy Y James; Lucas A Michelotti; Alexander D Glasco; Rebecca A Clemons; Robert A Powers; Ellen S James; D Rabern Simmons; Fengyan Bai; Shuhua Ge
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2019-08-01       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Technique: CRISP(e)R genetic mapping.

Authors:  Denise Waldron
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2016-05-16       Impact factor: 53.242

Review 3.  Speciation and adaptation research meets genome editing.

Authors:  Satoshi Ansai; Jun Kitano
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2022-05-30       Impact factor: 6.671

Review 4.  Tips, Tricks, and Potential Pitfalls of CRISPR Genome Editing in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Jacob S Antony; John M Hinz; John J Wyrick
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2022-05-30

5.  The cell cycle stage of bovine zygotes electroporated with CRISPR/Cas9-RNP affects frequency of Loss-of-heterozygosity editing events.

Authors:  Dennis Miskel; Mikhael Poirier; Luisa Beunink; Franca Rings; Eva Held; Ernst Tholen; Dawit Tesfaye; Karl Schellander; Dessie Salilew-Wondim; Carina Blaschka; Christine Große-Brinkhaus; Brenig Bertram; Michael Hoelker
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-06-24       Impact factor: 4.996

Review 6.  Yeast Still a Beast: Diverse Applications of CRISPR/Cas Editing Technology in S. cerevisiae.

Authors:  Rachael M Giersch; Gregory C Finnigan
Journal:  Yale J Biol Med       Date:  2017-12-19

7.  Clonal Heterogeneity Influences the Fate of New Adaptive Mutations.

Authors:  Ignacio Vázquez-García; Francisco Salinas; Jing Li; Andrej Fischer; Benjamin Barré; Johan Hallin; Anders Bergström; Elisa Alonso-Perez; Jonas Warringer; Ville Mustonen; Gianni Liti
Journal:  Cell Rep       Date:  2017-10-17       Impact factor: 9.423

8.  Genetic variation in recombination rate in the pig.

Authors:  Martin Johnsson; Andrew Whalen; Roger Ros-Freixedes; Gregor Gorjanc; Ching-Yi Chen; William O Herring; Dirk-Jan de Koning; John M Hickey
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2021-06-25       Impact factor: 4.297

Review 9.  Gene Disruption Technologies Have the Potential to Transform Stored Product Insect Pest Control.

Authors:  Lindsey C Perkin; Sherry L Adrianos; Brenda Oppert
Journal:  Insects       Date:  2016-09-19       Impact factor: 2.769

10.  Targeted recombination to increase genetic gain in self-pollinated species.

Authors:  Sushan Ru; Rex Bernardo
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2018-10-30       Impact factor: 5.699

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.