Literature DB >> 32831655

Cross-Site Evaluation of Commercial Sanger Sequencing Chemistries.

Jessica W Podnar1, Lorena Pantano2, Molly J Zeller3, Fred W Kolling4, Yanping Zhang5, Yuriy O Alekseyev6, Jeremy Niece3, Heather Deiderick1, Jun Fan7, Xiaoling Xuei8, Jan Kieleczawa9, Stuart S Levine10, Zachary T Herbert11, Marie Adams12.   

Abstract

Sanger sequencing remains an essential tool utilized by researchers. Despite competition from commercial sequencing providers, many academic sequencing core facilities continue to offer these services based on a model of competitive pricing, knowledgeable technical support, and rapid turnaround time. In-house Sanger sequencing remains a viable core service and, until recently, Applied Biosystems BigDye Terminator chemistry was the only commercially available solution for Sanger DNA sequencing on Applied Biosystems (ABI) instruments; however, several new products employing novel dye chemistries and reaction configurations have entered the market. As a result, there is a need to benchmark the performance of these new chemistries on various DNA templates, including difficult-to-sequence templates, and their amenability to commonly employed cost-saving measures, such as dye dilution and reaction miniaturization. To evaluate these new reagents, a study was designed to compare the quality of Sanger sequencing data produced by ABI BigDye and commercially available kits from 2 other vendors using both control and difficult-to-sequence DNA templates under various reaction conditions. This study will serve as a valuable resource to core facilities conducting Sanger sequencing that wish to evaluate the use of an alternative chemistry in their sequencing core. © Association of Biomolecular Resource Facilities.

Keywords:  BigDye alternative; BrightDye; BrilliantDye; Sanger chemistry replacement; Sanger dye evaluation

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32831655      PMCID: PMC7351326          DOI: 10.7171/jbt.20-3103-002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomol Tech        ISSN: 1524-0215


  6 in total

Review 1.  Next-generation DNA sequencing techniques.

Authors:  Wilhelm J Ansorge
Journal:  N Biotechnol       Date:  2009-02-03       Impact factor: 5.079

2.  Identification of optimal protocols for sequencing difficult templates: results of the 2008 ABRF DNA Sequencing Research Group difficult template study 2008.

Authors:  Jan Kieleczawa; Debbie Adam; Doug Bintzler; Michelle Detwiler; David Needleman; Peter Schweitzer; Sushmita Singh; Robert Steen; Michael Zianni
Journal:  J Biomol Tech       Date:  2009-04

3.  Base-calling of automated sequencer traces using phred. I. Accuracy assessment.

Authors:  B Ewing; L Hillier; M C Wendl; P Green
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 9.043

4.  Base-calling of automated sequencer traces using phred. II. Error probabilities.

Authors:  B Ewing; P Green
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 9.043

5.  Poly peak parser: Method and software for identification of unknown indels using sanger sequencing of polymerase chain reaction products.

Authors:  Jonathon T Hill; Bradley L Demarest; Brent W Bisgrove; Yi-Chu Su; Megan Smith; H Joseph Yost
Journal:  Dev Dyn       Date:  2014-09-30       Impact factor: 3.780

Review 6.  The sequence of sequencers: The history of sequencing DNA.

Authors:  James M Heather; Benjamin Chain
Journal:  Genomics       Date:  2015-11-10       Impact factor: 5.736

  6 in total
  1 in total

1.  Direct Detection of Antibiotic Resistance in Chinese Helicobacter pylori Clinical Isolates by Sequencing-Based Approach.

Authors:  Lixia Tian; Yi Yao; Li Yin; Lanxiang Wang; Ze An; Lin Kang; Chenglin Ru; Jinping Li
Journal:  J Healthc Eng       Date:  2022-04-15       Impact factor: 3.822

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.