Literature DB >> 25147662

Antimicrobial Resistance Patterns and Prevalence of blaPER-1 and blaVEB-1 Genes Among ESBL-producing Pseudomonas aeruginosa Isolates in West of Iran.

Mohammad Yousef Alikhani1, Zahra Karimi Tabar1, Fatemeh Mihani1, Enayat Kalantar2, Pegman Karami1, Mahnaz Sadeghi3, Shiva Ahdi Khosroshahi4, Safar Farajnia5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Pseudomonas aeruginosa is a leading cause of nosocomial infections worldwide. Resistance of P. aeruginosa strains to the broad-spectrum cephalosporins may be caused by extended-spectrum β-lactamases (ESBLs).
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to determine the antimicrobial resistance patterns and prevalence of PER-1 and VEB-1 type genes among ESBL producing strains of P. aeruginosa.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 106 P. aeruginosa isolates were collected from two university hospitals in Hamadan, Iran, during a7-month study (2009). The antimicrobial susceptibility of isolates was determined by disc diffusion method and interpreted according to the clinical and laboratory standards institute (CLSI) recommendations. Production of ESBL was determined by combined disk test and presence of PER-1 and VEB-1 type ESBL genes was identified by PCR.
RESULTS: The resistance against broad-spectrum cephalosporins and monobactames were: cefepime (97%), cefotaxime (92.5%) ceftazidime (51%), and aztreonam (27%). Ciprofloxacin (91.5%), imipenem (84.9%) and meropenem (82.1%) were the most effective anti-pseudomonas agents in this study. The results revealed that 88.7% of the isolates were multidrug resistant, 58.25% of those were ESBL positive. Sixteen (26.6%), 9 (15%) and 3 (5%) strains among ESBL-producing strains contained blaPER-1, blaVEB and blaPER-1-blaVEB, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: This study highlighted the need to establish antimicrobial resistance surveillance networks for P. aeruginosa to determine the appropriate empirical treatment regimens. The high prevalence of multidrug resistance and production of ESBLs in P. aeruginosa isolates confirms the necessity of protocols considering these issues in the hospitals.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Antimicrobial Drug Resistance; Beta-lactamase; Pseudomonas aeruginosa

Year:  2014        PMID: 25147662      PMCID: PMC4138671          DOI: 10.5812/jjm.8888

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Jundishapur J Microbiol        ISSN: 2008-3645            Impact factor:   0.747


1. Background

Pseudomonas aeruginosa is an important cause of nosocomial infections, including pneumonia, burn infection, urinary tract infections, meningitis and bacteremia. The infections can be particularly develop to a severe form in immune deficient patients (1). Antibiotics have been used successfully for several decades, but resistance genes have emerged and disseminated particularly in the last few years (2). Extended-spectrum β-lactamases (ESBLs) mediate resistance to various broad-spectrum cephalosporins, including cefotaxime, ceftriaxone, ceftazidime, and aztreonam (3). These enzymes originally collected from Klebsiella pneumoniae and Escherichia coli and recently from P. aeruginosa (4-7). Most of the methods for detection of ESBLs are used in bacterial species such as Klebsiella and E. coli lacking chromosomal β-lactamase activity (8, 9), However, the detection of ESBL production in P. aeruginosa has some difficulties, because this bacterium not only has an inducible AmpC enzyme but also has an efflux-mediated resistance and a higher degree of impermeability than Enterobacteriaceae (10, 11). The PER-1 and VEB-1 type ESBLs belong to class A of β- lactamases and is associated with high level of resistance to cephems, monobactams and ceftazidime (12, 13).

2. Objectives

The aim of this study was to determine the antibacterial resistance patterns and prevalence of PER-1 and VEB type ESBLs among P. aeruginosa isolated from patients in west of Iran.

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. Bacterial Isolates

A total of 106 isolates of P. aeruginosa recovered from various clinical specimens (Table 1) in Beasat Teaching Hospital at the Hamadan University of Medical Sciences during a 7-month study in 2009. The identification were carried out by colonial morphology, positive oxidase test, pigment formation; growth test at 42ºC on nutrient agar, Gram staining and motility test.
Table 1.

Distribution of P. seudomonas aeruginosa by Site of Isolation

SourceIsolates, No. (%)
Burn wounds 55 (51.9)
Trashes 20 (18.9)
Urine 12 (11.3)
Blood 7 (6.6)
Feces 6 (5.7)
Sputum 5 (4.7)
CSF[a] 1 (0.9)
Total 106 (100)

a Abbreviation: CFS, Cerebral spinal fluid

a Abbreviation: CFS, Cerebral spinal fluid

3.2. Antibiotic Susceptibility Test

Antibiotic susceptibility of the isolates was determined by standard disk diffusion method (14). The following antibiotics were used: gentamicin (30 µg), aztreonam (30 µg), meropenem (10 µg), imipenem (10 µg), amikacin (30 µg), tobramycin (30 µg), piperacillin (30 µg), ceftazidime (30 µg), ciprofloxacin (5 µg), ofloxacin (5 µg), cefepime (30 µg) and cefotaxime (30 µg) (Himedia, India). P. aeruginosa ATCC 27853 was used as control. The results were interpreted according to the clinical and laboratory standards institute (CLSI) (15).

3.3. Phenotypic Detection of Beta-Lactamase

The isolates were tested for the ESBLs production by using combine disk test (CDT) as CLSI recommendations. CDT were performed on ceftazidime, cefotaxime, cefepime and aztreonam resistant strains by placing disks of ceftazidime, and cefotaxime (30 µg each) at a 20 mm distance from a disk containing ceftazidime-clavulanic acid (30/10μg), cefotaxime-clavulanic acid (30/10µg) and cefepime-clavulanic acid (30/10 µg) (16). ESBL production was inferred when the cephalosporin inhibitory zones were expanded by the clavulanate.

3.4. PCR Amplification

PCR amplifications were done using specific primers for the β-lactamases PER-1, and VEB-1 genes, as described previously (17). PCR was performed for all ESBL-producers which their resistance to cephalosporins and phenotypic was identified by confirmatory tests. DNA was extracted by the boiling method as previously described (17). The DNA amplification program consisted of an initial denaturation (94 °C, 5 minutes) followed by 35 cycles of denaturation (94 °C, 60 seconds), annealing (50 °C for PER-1 and 55 °C for VEB-1, 60 seconds), extension (72 °C, 45 seconds) and a single final extension for 5 minutes at 72 °C. Reaction mixtures for PCR contained 1.5mM MgCl2, 0.5 mM of each primer, 0.2 mM of dNTPs, 1 U of Taq polymerase, 1X PCR buffer and 2 µL of DNA. Primers PER-F (5-AATTTGGGCTTAGGGCAGAA-3') and PER-R (5'-ATGAATGTCATTATAAAAGC-3') were used for blaPER-1; and VEB-F (5'-CGACTTCCATTTCCCGATGC-3') and VEB-R (5'-GGACTCTGCAACAAAT AC GC-3') were used for blaVEB-1 amplification.

4. Results

4.1. Antimicrobial Susceptibility Test

Table 2 shows the antimicrobial susceptibility pattern of P. aeruginosa strains. Ciprofloxacin (91.5%), imipenem.
Table 2.

Antimicrobial Susceptibility Pattern of P. aeruginosa Strains

AntimicrobialsResistance, No. (%)Sensitive, No. (%)Intermediate, No. (%)
Amikacin 32 (30.2)70 (66)4 (3.8)
Ceftazidime 54 (51)40 (37.7)12(11.3)
Aztreonam 29 (27.4)70 (66)7 (6.6)
‍Cefepime 103 (97.2)1 (0.9)2 (1.9)
cefotaxime 53 (50)10 (9.4)43 (40.6)
Ciprofloxacin 5 (4.7)97 (91.5)4 (3.8)
Gentamicin 39 (36.8)55 (51.9)12 (11.3)
Imipenem 8 (7.5)90 (84.9)8 (7.5)
Meropenem 14 (13.2)87 (82.1)5 (4.7)
Ofloxacin 31 (29.2)72 (67.9)3 (2.8)
Piperacillin 99 (93.4)7 (6.6)0
Tobramycin 39 (36.8)67 (63.2)0
(84.9%) and meropenem (82.1%) were the most active antimicrobial agents followed by ofloxacin (67.9% susceptibility). Aztreonam, a monobactam, and amikacin showed antibiotic activity against 66% of the strains. Susceptibility to the cephalosporins was reduced to 37.7% for ceftazidime, followed by cefotaxime (9.4%) and Cefepime (0.9%). ESBL Production: Among 106 isolates, 94 (88.7%) were multidrug resistant and 60(58.3%) were putative ESBL producers using phenotypic confirmatory tests (Table 3). Sixteen (26.6%), 9 (15%) and 3 (5%) strains among 60 ESBL-producing strains had blaPER-1 (Figure 1), blaVEB-1 (Figure 2), and blaPER-1- blaVEB related genes, respectively (Table 4).
Table 3.

Susceptibility Pattern to Antimicrobial Agents in ESBLs and non ESBLs-producing P. aeruginosa Strains

ESBL Positive (n=60)ESBL Negative (n=46)
AntimicrobialsResistant, No. (%)Susceptible, No. (%)Intermediate, No. (%)Resistant, No. (%)Susceptible, No. (%)Intermediate, No. (%)
Amikacin 29 (48.3)30 (50)1 (1.7)4 (9.3)37 (86)2 (4.7)
‍Ceftazidime 40 (66.7)18 (30)2 (3.3)13 (28.3)24 (55.2)6 (13)
Aztreonam 25 (41.7)32 (53.3)3 (5)3 (6.97)39 (90.69)1 (2.32)
‍Cefepime 58 (96.7)02 (3.3)42 (97.67)1 (2.32)0
cefotaxime 41 (68.3)6 (10)13 (21.7)12 (27.90)3 (6.97)28 (65.11)
Ciprofloxacin 5 (8.3)50 (83.3)5 (8.3)042 (97.67)1 (2.32)
Gentamicin 32 (53.3)28 (46.7)07 (16.27)36 (83.72)0
Imipenem 7 (11.7)45 (75)8 (13.3)1 (2.32)41 (95.34)1 (2.32)
Meropenem 13 (21.7)44 (73.3)3 (5)2 (4.65)39 (90.69)2 (4.65)
Ofloxacin 30 (50)29 (48.3)1 (1.7)4 (9.30)37 (86.04)2 (4.65)
Piperacillin 54 (90)6 (10)041 (95.34)2 (4.65)0
Tobramycin 31 (51.6)28 (46.7)1 (1.7)4 (9.30)39 (90.69)0
Figure 1.

PCR Amplification of blaPER-1 Gene

L: 100 bp DNA ladder, C-: negative control, C+: positive control, N: PER-1 negative strains, 1–3: PCR products from PER-1positive strains.

Figure 2.

PCR Amplification of blaVEB-1 Gene

L: 100 bp DNA ladder, C-: negative control, C+: positive control, N: negative strain, 1–4: PCR products fromVEB-1 positive strains.

Table 4.

Association of Antimicrobial Resistance Pattern and ESBL Genotypes

PER-1:16 (26.6%)VEB: 9 (15%)
AntimicrobialsResistant, No. (%)Susceptible, No. (%)Intermediate, No. (%)Resistant, No. (%)Susceptible, No. (%)Intermediate, No. (%)
Amikacin 10 (62.5)5 (31.25)1(6.25)5 (55.5)2 (22.2)2 (22.2)
Ceftazidime 12 (75)4 (25)09 (100)00
Aztreonam 10 (62.5)4 (25)2 (12.5)9 (100)00
‍Cefepime 16 (100)009 (100)00
cefotaxime 87.5 (14)02 (12.5)9 (100)00
Ciprofloxacin 2 (12.5)13 ( 81.25)1 (6.25)2 (22.2)6 (66.6)1 (11.11)
Gentamicin 10(62.5)6 ( 37.5 )06 (66.6)3 (33.3)0
Imipenem 5 (31.25)5 (31.25)6 (37.5)1 (11.11)6 (66.6)2 (22.2)
Meropenem 7 ( 43.75)8 (50)1 (6.25)6 (66.6)2 (22.2)1 (11.11)
Ofloxacin 11 (68.8)5 (31.25)08 (88.8)1 (11.11)0
Piperacillin 16 (100)009 (100)00
Tobramycin 10 (62.5)6 ( 37.5 )06 (66.6)3 (33.3)0

PCR Amplification of blaPER-1 Gene

L: 100 bp DNA ladder, C-: negative control, C+: positive control, N: PER-1 negative strains, 1–3: PCR products from PER-1positive strains.

PCR Amplification of blaVEB-1 Gene

L: 100 bp DNA ladder, C-: negative control, C+: positive control, N: negative strain, 1–4: PCR products fromVEB-1 positive strains.

5. Discussion

P. aeruginosa has a high resistance to antibiotics and is a common cause of morbidity and mortality in hospitalized and immunocompromised patients (18). Treatment of P. aeruginosa infections is complicated by the inhered and acquired resistance to the most of commonly used antimicrobial agents (19). The results from this study showed the high resistance of P. aeruginosa to most of used antimicrobial agents. It was also demonstrated that the prevalence of antibiotic resistance of the isolates was very high in comparison to other studies and most of P. aeruginosa isolates (88.7%) were multi-drug resistant (resistant to ≥ 3 different antibiotic classes) (20-25). The prevalence of ESBL- producing P. aeruginosa isolates in this study was also higher than other investigations (5, 20, 26, 27). Among 60 ESBL-positive strains, 16 (26.6%), 9 (15%) and 3 (5%) contained PER-1, VEB-1 and PER-1-VEB-1 genes, respectively. These results indicated that the prevalence of VEB-1 gene in our area, is higher than Turkey and Korea, but the prevalence of VEB-1 and PER-1 genes, is lower than in Thailand (94.44% blaVEB-1) and Italy (34.61% blaPER-1) (5, 13, 26). Data on the prevalence of ESBL- producing P. aeruginosa strains in our area is limited. In the study performed by Shahcheraghi and colleges on P. aeruginosa isolates in Tehran, the rate of blaVEB and blaPER ESBLs were reported 24% and 17%, respectively, that was similar to our results (28). The high prevalence of PER-1 and VEB-1 indicated the high resistance to penicillins, ceftazidime and cefotaxime, as reported by other studies (26, 28). This is the first report about the presence of these enzymes in P. aeruginosa isolates from west of Iran. It has shown that ESBL production in strains of P. aeruginosa can greatly complicate the clinical management of infection if advanced care is not taken. However, further studies are needed to determine other ESBL- types in P.aeruginosa strains in this area and their role in resistance to other antibiotic classes. The results of this study emphasizes on the need for a surveillance network to monitor the trends and emerge of new resistance mechanism in P. aeruginosa from different geographic regions. Therefore, the improvement in antibiotic prescription policies and infection control programs are of high necessity to prevent the spread of such resistant infectious agents.
  26 in total

Review 1.  Laboratory detection of extended-spectrum beta-lactamases (ESBLs)--the need for a reliable, reproducible method.

Authors:  S Y Essack
Journal:  Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 2.803

2.  Oxacillinase-mediated resistance to cefepime and susceptibility to ceftazidime in Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

Authors:  D Aubert; L Poirel; J Chevalier; S Leotard; J M Pages; P Nordmann
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 5.191

3.  Bacteriology of burn wounds in Enugu, Nigeria.

Authors:  U C Ozumba; B C Jiburum
Journal:  Burns       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 2.744

4.  Detection of metallo-β-lactamase-encoding genes among clinical isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in northwest of Iran.

Authors:  Saber Yousefi; Safar Farajnia; Mohammd Reza Nahaei; Mohammad Taghi Akhi; Reza Ghotaslou; Mohammad Hossein Soroush; Behrooz Naghili; Nima Hosseini Jazani
Journal:  Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2010-09-16       Impact factor: 2.803

5.  Prevalence of OXA-type β-lactamases among Acinetobacter baumannii isolates from Northwest of Iran.

Authors:  Nasrollah Sohrabi; Safar Farajnia; Mohammad Taghi Akhi; Mohammad Reza Nahaei; Behrooz Naghili; Amir Peymani; Zohreh Amiri; Mohammad Ahangarzadeh Rezaee; Nazli Saeedi
Journal:  Microb Drug Resist       Date:  2012-02-21       Impact factor: 3.431

6.  Detection of extended-spectrum beta-lactamases in clinical isolates of Klebsiella pneumoniae and Escherichia coli.

Authors:  G A Jacoby; P Han
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 5.948

7.  Spread of bla(CTX-M-type) and bla(PER-2) beta-lactamase genes in clinical isolates from Bolivian hospitals.

Authors:  Giuseppe Celenza; Cristina Pellegrini; Marisa Caccamo; Bernardetta Segatore; Gianfranco Amicosante; Mariagrazia Perilli
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2006-03-01       Impact factor: 5.790

8.  Detection of VEB-1, OXA-10 and PER-1 genotypes in extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains isolated from burn patients.

Authors:  Akbar Mirsalehian; Mehdi Feizabadi; Farrokh A Nakhjavani; Fereshteh Jabalameli; Hamidreza Goli; Narges Kalantari
Journal:  Burns       Date:  2009-06-12       Impact factor: 2.744

9.  Outbreak of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase VEB-1-producing isolates of Acinetobacter baumannii in a French hospital.

Authors:  Laurent Poirel; Olivier Menuteau; Nathalie Agoli; Christian Cattoen; Patrice Nordmann
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 5.948

10.  Pseudomonas aeruginosa bloodstream infections: risk factors and treatment outcome related to expression of the PER-1 extended-spectrum beta-lactamase.

Authors:  Andrea Endimiani; Francesco Luzzaro; Beatrice Pini; Gianfranco Amicosante; Gian Maria Rossolini; Antonio Q Toniolo
Journal:  BMC Infect Dis       Date:  2006-03-16       Impact factor: 3.090

View more
  15 in total

1.  Systematic review and meta-analysis of imipenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa prevalence in Iran.

Authors:  Hamid Vaez; Amin Salehi-Abargouei; Farzad Khademi
Journal:  Germs       Date:  2017-06-01

2.  Characterization of Multidrug Resistant Extended-Spectrum Beta-Lactamase-Producing Escherichia coli among Uropathogens of Pediatrics in North of Iran.

Authors:  Mohammad Sadegh Rezai; Ebrahim Salehifar; Alireza Rafiei; Taimour Langaee; Mohammadreza Rafati; Kheironesa Shafahi; Gohar Eslami
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2015-05-03       Impact factor: 3.411

3.  Morphological and Bactericidal Effects of Amikacin, Meropenem and Imipenem on Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

Authors:  Mohsen Moghoofei; Hossein Fazeli; Farkhondeh Poursina; Bahram Nasr Esfahani; Sharareh Moghim; Hamid Vaez; Shima Hadifar; Hajieh Ghasemian Safaei
Journal:  Jundishapur J Microbiol       Date:  2015-11-14       Impact factor: 0.747

4.  Multidrug Resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa in Iran: A Systematic Review and Metaanalysis.

Authors:  Hamid Vaez; Amin Salehi-Abargouei; Zahra Rashki Ghalehnoo; Farzad Khademi
Journal:  J Glob Infect Dis       Date:  2018 Oct-Dec

5.  Determination of virulence determinants of Escherichia coli strains isolated from patients with colorectal cancer compared to the healthy subjects.

Authors:  Omid Zarei; Mohammad Reza Arabestan; Amir Majlesi; Younes Mohammadi; Mohammad Yousef Alikhani
Journal:  Gastroenterol Hepatol Bed Bench       Date:  2019

6.  The impact of infectious diseases consultation on the management and outcomes of Pseudomonas aeruginosa bacteraemia in adults: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Fabian Chiong; Mohammed S Wasef; Kwee Chin Liew; Raquel Cowan; Danny Tsai; Yin Peng Lee; Larry Croft; Owen Harris; Stella May Gwini; Eugene Athan
Journal:  BMC Infect Dis       Date:  2021-07-09       Impact factor: 3.090

Review 7.  Mortality attributable to carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa bacteremia: a meta-analysis of cohort studies.

Authors:  Yu Zhang; Xiao-Li Chen; Ai-Wei Huang; Su-Ling Liu; Wei-Jiang Liu; Ni Zhang; Xu-Zai Lu
Journal:  Emerg Microbes Infect       Date:  2016-03-23       Impact factor: 7.163

8.  Clonal Relatedness among Imipenem-Resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa Isolated from ICU-Hospitalized Patients.

Authors:  Hamid Vaez; Sharareh Moghim; Bahram Nasr Esfahani; Hajieh Ghasemian Safaei
Journal:  Crit Care Res Pract       Date:  2015-12-20

9.  Antibiotic susceptibility pattern and analysis of plasmid profiles of Pseudomonas aeruginosa from human, animal and plant sources.

Authors:  Bamidele Tolulope Odumosu; Olabayo Ajetunmobi; Hannah Dada-Adegbola; Idowu Odutayo
Journal:  Springerplus       Date:  2016-08-22

10.  EXTENDED-SPECTRUM BETA-LACTAMASE PRODUCING GRAM NEGATIVE BACTERIA IN IRAN: A REVIEW.

Authors:  Hamed Ebrahimzadeh Leylabadlo; Tala Pourlak; Abed Zahedi Bialvaei; Mohammad Aghazadeh; Mohammad Asgharzadeh; Hossein Samadi Kafil
Journal:  Afr J Infect Dis       Date:  2017-06-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.