Aron S Buchman1, Lei Yu2, Robert S Wilson3, Patricia A Boyle3, Julie A Schneider4, David A Bennett2. 1. Rush Alzheimer's Disease Center, Department of Neurological Sciences, Aron_S_Buchman@rush.edu. 2. Rush Alzheimer's Disease Center, Department of Neurological Sciences. 3. Rush Alzheimer's Disease Center, Behavioral Sciences, and. 4. Rush Alzheimer's Disease Center, Department of Neurological Sciences, Department of Pathology (Neuropathology), Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: First, we tested the hypothesis that the rate of change of physical frailty and cognitive function in older adults are correlated. Next, we examined if their rates of change are associated with the same brain pathologies. METHODS: About 2,167 older adults participating in the Religious Orders Study and the Rush Memory and Aging Project had annual clinical evaluations. Bivariate random coefficient models were used to estimate simultaneously the rates of change in both frailty and cognition, and the correlation of change was characterized by a joint distribution of the random effects. Then, we examined whether postmortem indices from deceased were associated with the rate of change of frailty and cognition. RESULTS: During an average follow-up of 6 years, frailty worsened by 0.09 unit/y and cognition declined by 0.08 unit/y. Most individuals showed worsening frailty and cognition (82.8%); 17% showed progressive frailty alone and <1% showed only cognitive decline. The rates of change of frailty and cognition were strongly correlated (ρ = -0.73, p < .001). Among deceased (N = 828), Alzheimer's disease pathology, macroinfarcts, and nigral neuronal loss showed independent associations with the rate of change in both frailty and cognition (all ps < .001). In these models, demographics explained about 9% of the variation in individual rate of change in frailty, and neuropathologies explained about 8%. In contrast, demographics and neuropathologies accounted for 2% and 30%, respectively, of the variance in the cognitive decline. CONCLUSION: The rates of change in frailty and cognition are strongly correlated and this may be due in part because they share a common pathologic basis.
OBJECTIVE: First, we tested the hypothesis that the rate of change of physical frailty and cognitive function in older adults are correlated. Next, we examined if their rates of change are associated with the same brain pathologies. METHODS: About 2,167 older adults participating in the Religious Orders Study and the Rush Memory and Aging Project had annual clinical evaluations. Bivariate random coefficient models were used to estimate simultaneously the rates of change in both frailty and cognition, and the correlation of change was characterized by a joint distribution of the random effects. Then, we examined whether postmortem indices from deceased were associated with the rate of change of frailty and cognition. RESULTS: During an average follow-up of 6 years, frailty worsened by 0.09 unit/y and cognition declined by 0.08 unit/y. Most individuals showed worsening frailty and cognition (82.8%); 17% showed progressive frailty alone and <1% showed only cognitive decline. The rates of change of frailty and cognition were strongly correlated (ρ = -0.73, p < .001). Among deceased (N = 828), Alzheimer's disease pathology, macroinfarcts, and nigral neuronal loss showed independent associations with the rate of change in both frailty and cognition (all ps < .001). In these models, demographics explained about 9% of the variation in individual rate of change in frailty, and neuropathologies explained about 8%. In contrast, demographics and neuropathologies accounted for 2% and 30%, respectively, of the variance in the cognitive decline. CONCLUSION: The rates of change in frailty and cognition are strongly correlated and this may be due in part because they share a common pathologic basis.
Authors: Linda P Fried; Luigi Ferrucci; Jonathan Darer; Jeff D Williamson; Gerard Anderson Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2004-03 Impact factor: 6.053
Authors: Karen Bandeen-Roche; Qian-Li Xue; Luigi Ferrucci; Jeremy Walston; Jack M Guralnik; Paulo Chaves; Scott L Zeger; Linda P Fried Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2006-03 Impact factor: 6.053
Authors: Calvin Hirsch; Melissa L Anderson; Anne Newman; Willem Kop; Sharon Jackson; John Gottdiener; Russell Tracy; Linda P Fried Journal: Ann Epidemiol Date: 2006-01-04 Impact factor: 3.797
Authors: Luigi Ferrucci; Jack M Guralnik; Stephanie Studenski; Linda P Fried; Gordon B Cutler; Jeremy D Walston Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2004-04 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Robert S Wilson; Laurel A Beckett; Lisa L Barnes; Julie A Schneider; Julie Bach; Denis A Evans; David A Bennett Journal: Psychol Aging Date: 2002-06
Authors: Lisa L Barnes; Robert S Wilson; Yan Li; Neelum T Aggarwal; David W Gilley; Judith J McCann; Denis A Evans Journal: Am J Geriatr Psychiatry Date: 2005-11 Impact factor: 4.105
Authors: Shahram Oveisgharan; Lei Yu; Robert J Dawe; David A Bennett; Aron S Buchman Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2020-03-09 Impact factor: 6.053
Authors: Aron S Buchman; Lei Yu; Shahram Oveisgharan; Jose M Farfel; Julie A Schneider; David A Bennett Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2021-03-31 Impact factor: 6.053
Authors: Neelesh K Nadkarni; Oscar L Lopez; Subashan Perera; Stephanie A Studenski; Beth E Snitz; Kirk I Erickson; Chester A Mathis; Robert D Nebes; Mark Redfern; William E Klunk Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2017-03-01 Impact factor: 6.053
Authors: Brian Downer; Soham Al Snih; Bret T Howrey; Mukaila A Raji; Kyriakos S Markides; Kenneth J Ottenbacher Journal: Aging Ment Health Date: 2018-11-24 Impact factor: 3.658
Authors: Márlon J R Aliberti; Irena S Cenzer; Alexander K Smith; Sei J Lee; Kristine Yaffe; Kenneth E Covinsky Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2018-11-23 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Manuel M Montero-Odasso; Yanina Sarquis-Adamson; Mark Speechley; Michael J Borrie; Vladimir C Hachinski; Jennie Wells; Patricia M Riccio; Marcelo Schapira; Ervin Sejdic; Richard M Camicioli; Robert Bartha; William E McIlroy; Susan Muir-Hunter Journal: JAMA Neurol Date: 2017-07-01 Impact factor: 18.302
Authors: Ferenc Deak; Willard M Freeman; Zoltan Ungvari; Anna Csiszar; William E Sonntag Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2015-11-20 Impact factor: 6.053