OBJECTIVES: Few studies report incidence of mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and other mild cognitive disorders (MCD) in cohorts in their 60s, at an age when diagnoses are less stable. The authors' goal was to estimate the incidence and prevalence of MCI and MCD, characterize subgroups with stable vs nonstable diagnoses, and evaluate the impact of diagnosis on daily life in a young-old cohort. METHODS: A community-based cohort age 60 to 64 years in 1999 (n = 2551) was monitored for 8 years and assessed every 4 years. A two-stage sampling design was used to identify MCI and MCD through a neuropsychological and neurological assessment. A panel of physicians blind to previous diagnoses reviewed each case using published criteria. RESULTS: The prevalence of MCDs in the cohort aged 68 to 72 years at the last follow-up was approximately 10%. An estimated 141 subjects (7.7%) progressed to MCI and 183 subjects (10.0%) progressed to MCD between years 4 and 8. Only eight participants received a dementia diagnosis at any wave, five of whom progressed from MCDs. More than 45% of diagnoses were unstable during the 8 years of follow-up. Stable diagnoses were associated with lower Mini-Mental State Examination scores, history of neurological disorder, higher cardiovascular risk, and depression at baseline. MCDs were associated with impairments in instrumental activities of daily living and higher rates of reporting memory problems prior to diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS: MCDs in individuals in their 60s occur in at least 10% of the population and are likely to be heterogeneous in terms of their etiology and long-term prognosis, but may cause a significant impact in everyday life.
OBJECTIVES: Few studies report incidence of mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and other mild cognitive disorders (MCD) in cohorts in their 60s, at an age when diagnoses are less stable. The authors' goal was to estimate the incidence and prevalence of MCI and MCD, characterize subgroups with stable vs nonstable diagnoses, and evaluate the impact of diagnosis on daily life in a young-old cohort. METHODS: A community-based cohort age 60 to 64 years in 1999 (n = 2551) was monitored for 8 years and assessed every 4 years. A two-stage sampling design was used to identify MCI and MCD through a neuropsychological and neurological assessment. A panel of physicians blind to previous diagnoses reviewed each case using published criteria. RESULTS: The prevalence of MCDs in the cohort aged 68 to 72 years at the last follow-up was approximately 10%. An estimated 141 subjects (7.7%) progressed to MCI and 183 subjects (10.0%) progressed to MCD between years 4 and 8. Only eight participants received a dementia diagnosis at any wave, five of whom progressed from MCDs. More than 45% of diagnoses were unstable during the 8 years of follow-up. Stable diagnoses were associated with lower Mini-Mental State Examination scores, history of neurological disorder, higher cardiovascular risk, and depression at baseline. MCDs were associated with impairments in instrumental activities of daily living and higher rates of reporting memory problems prior to diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS:MCDs in individuals in their 60s occur in at least 10% of the population and are likely to be heterogeneous in terms of their etiology and long-term prognosis, but may cause a significant impact in everyday life.
Authors: Aron S Buchman; Lei Yu; Robert S Wilson; Patricia A Boyle; Julie A Schneider; David A Bennett Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2014-08-18 Impact factor: 6.053
Authors: Andrea L C Schneider; Albert Richey Sharrett; Rebecca F Gottesman; Josef Coresh; Laura Coker; Lisa Wruck; Ola A Selnes; Jennifer Deal; David Knopman; Thomas H Mosley Journal: Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord Date: 2015 Jan-Mar Impact factor: 2.703
Authors: David P Sheppard; Jennifer E Iudicello; Mark W Bondi; Katie L Doyle; Erin E Morgan; Paul J Massman; Paul E Gilbert; Steven Paul Woods Journal: J Neurovirol Date: 2015-07-03 Impact factor: 2.643
Authors: Rebecca L Koscik; Asenath La Rue; Erin M Jonaitis; Ozioma C Okonkwo; Sterling C Johnson; Barbara B Bendlin; Bruce P Hermann; Mark A Sager Journal: Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord Date: 2014-02-20 Impact factor: 2.959
Authors: Jennifer S Gewandter; William Dale; Allison Magnuson; Chintan Pandya; Charles E Heckler; Tatyana Lemelman; Breton Roussel; Rafa Ifthikhar; James Dolan; Katia Noyes; Supriya G Mohile Journal: J Geriatr Oncol Date: 2015-09-11 Impact factor: 3.599
Authors: Amy J Jak; Matthew S Panizzon; Kelly M Spoon; Christine Fennema-Notestine; Carol E Franz; Wesley K Thompson; Kristen C Jacobson; Hong Xian; Lisa T Eyler; Eero Vuoksimaa; Rosemary Toomey; Michael J Lyons; Michael C Neale; Ming T Tsuang; Anders M Dale; William S Kremen Journal: Am J Geriatr Psychiatry Date: 2014-08-29 Impact factor: 4.105
Authors: Perminder S Sachdev; Darren M Lipnicki; Nicole A Kochan; John D Crawford; Anbupalam Thalamuthu; Gavin Andrews; Carol Brayne; Fiona E Matthews; Blossom C M Stephan; Richard B Lipton; Mindy J Katz; Karen Ritchie; Isabelle Carrière; Marie-Laure Ancelin; Linda C W Lam; Candy H Y Wong; Ada W T Fung; Antonio Guaita; Roberta Vaccaro; Annalisa Davin; Mary Ganguli; Hiroko Dodge; Tiffany Hughes; Kaarin J Anstey; Nicolas Cherbuin; Peter Butterworth; Tze Pin Ng; Qi Gao; Simone Reppermund; Henry Brodaty; Nicole Schupf; Jennifer Manly; Yaakov Stern; Antonio Lobo; Raúl Lopez-Anton; Javier Santabárbara Journal: PLoS One Date: 2015-11-05 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Roger A Dixon; Correne A DeCarlo; Stuart W S MacDonald; David Vergote; Jack Jhamandas; David Westaway Journal: Front Aging Neurosci Date: 2014-09-05 Impact factor: 5.750