Bret T Howrey1, Soham Al Snih2, Joyce A Middleton3, Kenneth J Ottenbacher2. 1. Department of Family Medicine, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston. 2. Division of Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston. 3. Division of Physical Therapy, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Progressive physical frailty and cognitive decline in older adults is associated with increased risk of falls, disability, institutionalization, and mortality; however, there is considerable heterogeneity in progression over time. We identified heterogeneous frailty and cognitive decline trajectory groups and examined the specific contribution of health conditions to these trajectories among older Mexican origin adults. METHODS: We use a sample from the Hispanic Established Population for the Epidemiological Study of the Elderly (HEPESE) with at least two measures of frailty criteria during 18 years follow-up: slow gait, weak handgrip strength, exhaustion, and unexplained weight loss (n = 1362, mean age 72). Cognition was measured using the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE). RESULTS: Using group-based trajectory models we identified three frailty groups-non-frail (n = 331), moderate progressive (n = 855), and progressive high (n = 149)-and three cognitive decline groups-non-cognitively impaired (476), moderate decline (677) and rapid decline (n = 209). The probability of membership in a high-frailty group given membership in a progressive cognitive decline group was 63%, while the probability of being in a non-frail group given membership in a non-cognitively impaired group was 68%. Predictors of membership into both the progressive high frailty and rapid cognitive decline groups combined were low education and diabetes. Weekly church attendance was associated with a 66% reduction in the odds of being in the combined groups. CONCLUSIONS: Interventions to reduce frailty rates and cognitive decline might focus on the management of underlying chronic disease and on increasing participation in activities outside the home.
BACKGROUND: Progressive physical frailty and cognitive decline in older adults is associated with increased risk of falls, disability, institutionalization, and mortality; however, there is considerable heterogeneity in progression over time. We identified heterogeneous frailty and cognitive decline trajectory groups and examined the specific contribution of health conditions to these trajectories among older Mexican origin adults. METHODS: We use a sample from the Hispanic Established Population for the Epidemiological Study of the Elderly (HEPESE) with at least two measures of frailty criteria during 18 years follow-up: slow gait, weak handgrip strength, exhaustion, and unexplained weight loss (n = 1362, mean age 72). Cognition was measured using the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE). RESULTS: Using group-based trajectory models we identified three frailty groups-non-frail (n = 331), moderate progressive (n = 855), and progressive high (n = 149)-and three cognitive decline groups-non-cognitively impaired (476), moderate decline (677) and rapid decline (n = 209). The probability of membership in a high-frailty group given membership in a progressive cognitive decline group was 63%, while the probability of being in a non-frail group given membership in a non-cognitively impaired group was 68%. Predictors of membership into both the progressive high frailty and rapid cognitive decline groups combined were low education and diabetes. Weekly church attendance was associated with a 66% reduction in the odds of being in the combined groups. CONCLUSIONS: Interventions to reduce frailty rates and cognitive decline might focus on the management of underlying chronic disease and on increasing participation in activities outside the home.
Authors: Bret T Howrey; Soham Al Snih; Kyu K Jana; Mary Kristen Peek; Kenneth J Ottenbacher Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2015-10-07 Impact factor: 6.053
Authors: Arnold Mitnitski; Xiaowei Song; Ingmar Skoog; G A Broe; Jafna L Cox; Eva Grunfeld; Kenneth Rockwood Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2005-12 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Howard Bergman; Luigi Ferrucci; Jack Guralnik; David B Hogan; Silvia Hummel; Sathya Karunananthan; Christina Wolfson Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2007-07 Impact factor: 6.053
Authors: Manuel Montero-Odasso; Howard Bergman; François Béland; Nadia Sourial; John D Fletcher; Luc Dallaire Journal: Arch Gerontol Geriatr Date: 2008-11-04 Impact factor: 3.250
Authors: Kenneth J Ottenbacher; Glenn V Ostir; M Kristen Peek; Soham Al Snih; Mukaila A Raji; Kyriakos S Markides Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2005-09 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: L P Fried; C M Tangen; J Walston; A B Newman; C Hirsch; J Gottdiener; T Seeman; R Tracy; W J Kop; G Burke; M A McBurnie Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2001-03 Impact factor: 6.053
Authors: E Kelaiditi; M Cesari; M Canevelli; G Abellan van Kan; P-J Ousset; S Gillette-Guyonnet; P Ritz; F Duveau; M E Soto; V Provencher; F Nourhashemi; A Salvà; P Robert; S Andrieu; Y Rolland; J Touchon; J L Fitten; B Vellas Journal: J Nutr Health Aging Date: 2013-09 Impact factor: 4.075
Authors: Emma Raymond; Chandra A Reynolds; Anna K Dahl Aslan; Deborah Finkel; Malin Ericsson; Sara Hägg; Nancy L Pedersen; Juulia Jylhävä Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2020-09-25 Impact factor: 6.053
Authors: Pasquale Mone; Antonella Pansini; Salvatore Frullone; Antonio de Donato; Veronica Buonincontri; Paolo De Blasiis; Anna Marro; Maria Morgante; Antonio De Luca; Gaetano Santulli Journal: Eur J Intern Med Date: 2022-03-14 Impact factor: 7.749
Authors: Alejandro Álvarez-Bustos; Jose Antonio Carnicero-Carreño; Juan Luis Sanchez-Sanchez; Francisco Javier Garcia-Garcia; Cristina Alonso-Bouzón; Leocadio Rodríguez-Mañas Journal: J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle Date: 2021-12-23 Impact factor: 12.910