Literature DB >> 25133083

Functional movement screening: the use of fundamental movements as an assessment of function-part 2.

Gray Cook1, Lee Burton2, Barbara J Hoogenboom3, Michael Voight4.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Part 1 of this two-part series (presented in the June issue of IJSPT) provided an introduction to functional movement screening, as well as the history, background, and a summary of the evidence regarding the reliability of the Functional Movement Screen (FMS™). Part 1 presented three of the seven fundamental movement patterns that comprise the FMS™, and the specific ordinal grading system from 0-3, used in the their scoring. Specifics for scoring each test are presented. Part 2 of this series provides a review of the concepts associated with the analysis of fundamental movement as a screening system for functional movement competency. In addition, the four remaining movements of the FMS™, which complement those described in Part 1, will be presented (to complete the total of seven fundamental movements): Shoulder Mobility, the Active Straight Leg Raise, the Trunk Stability Push-up, and Rotary Stability. The final four patterns are described in detail, and the specifics for scoring each test are presented, as well as the proposed clinical implications for receiving a grade less than a perfect "3". The intent of this two part series is to present the concepts associated with screening of fundamental movements, whether it is the FMS™ system or a different system devised by another clinician. Such a fundamental screen of the movement system should be incorporated into pre-participation screening and return to sport testing in order to determine whether an athlete has the essential movements needed to participate in sports activities at a level of minimum competency. Part 2 concludes with a discussion of the evidence related to functional movement screening, myths related to the FMS™, the future of functional movement screening, and the concept of movement as a system. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 5.

Keywords:  Function; movement screening; movement system

Year:  2014        PMID: 25133083      PMCID: PMC4127517     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther        ISSN: 2159-2896


  17 in total

1.  Core stability measures as risk factors for lower extremity injury in athletes.

Authors:  Darin T Leetun; Mary Lloyd Ireland; John D Willson; Bryon T Ballantyne; Irene McClay Davis
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 5.411

2.  Isometric lifting strength as a predictor of industrial back pain reports.

Authors:  M C Batti'e; S J Bigos; L D Fisher; T H Hansson; M E Jones; M D Wortley
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1989-08       Impact factor: 3.468

3.  Factor structure of the functional movement screen in marine officer candidates.

Authors:  Josh B Kazman; Jeffrey M Galecki; Peter Lisman; Patricia A Deuster; Francis G OʼConnor
Journal:  J Strength Cond Res       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 3.775

4.  Pre-participation screening: the use of fundamental movements as an assessment of function - part 2.

Authors:  Gray Cook; Lee Burton; Barb Hoogenboom
Journal:  N Am J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2006-08

5.  Modifiable risk factors predict injuries in firefighters during training academies.

Authors:  Robert J Butler; Michael Contreras; Lee C Burton; Phillip J Plisky; Adam Goode; Kyle Kiesel
Journal:  Work       Date:  2013-01-01

6.  Development and validation of a clinic-based prediction tool to identify female athletes at high risk for anterior cruciate ligament injury.

Authors:  Gregory D Myer; Kevin R Ford; Jane Khoury; Paul Succop; Timothy E Hewett
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2010-07-01       Impact factor: 6.202

7.  Intra- and inter-rater reliability of the selective functional movement assessment (sfma).

Authors:  Kathryn R Glaws; Christopher M Juneau; Lindsay C Becker; Stephanie L Di Stasi; Timothy E Hewett
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2014-04

Review 8.  Efficacy of the functional movement screen: a review.

Authors:  Kornelius Kraus; Elisabeth Schütz; William R Taylor; Ralf Doyscher
Journal:  J Strength Cond Res       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 3.775

9.  Functional movement screen normative values in a young, active population.

Authors:  Anthony G Schneiders; Asa Davidsson; Elvira Hörman; S John Sullivan
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2011-06

10.  Prediction of injury by limited and asymmetrical fundamental movement patterns in american football players.

Authors:  Kyle B Kiesel; Robert J Butler; Philip J Plisky
Journal:  J Sport Rehabil       Date:  2013-11-14       Impact factor: 1.931

View more
  54 in total

Review 1.  Reliability and Association with Injury of Movement Screens: A Critical Review.

Authors:  Robert McCunn; Karen Aus der Fünten; Hugh H K Fullagar; Ian McKeown; Tim Meyer
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 11.136

2.  ACUTE EFFECTS OF DIFFERENT SELF-MASSAGE VOLUMES ON THE FMS™ OVERHEAD DEEP SQUAT PERFORMANCE.

Authors:  Estêvão Rios Monteiro; Jakob Škarabot; Andrew D Vigotsky; Amanda Fernandes Brown; Thiago Matassoli Gomes; Jefferson da Silva Novaes
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2017-02

3.  PREDICTION OF FUNCTIONAL MOVEMENT SCREEN™ PERFORMANCE FROM LOWER EXTREMITY RANGE OF MOTION AND CORE TESTS.

Authors:  Nicole J Chimera; Shelby Knoeller; Ron Cooper; Nicholas Kothe; Craig Smith; Meghan Warren
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2017-04

4.  CrossFit athletes exhibit high symmetry of fundamental movement patterns. A cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Silvio Tafuri; Angela Notarnicola; Antonello Monno; Francesco Ferretti; Biagio Moretti
Journal:  Muscles Ligaments Tendons J       Date:  2016-05-19

5.  THERE ARE NO BIOMECHANICAL DIFFERENCES BETWEEN RUNNERS CLASSIFIED BY THE FUNCTIONAL MOVEMENT SCREEN.

Authors:  Rodrigo Ribeiro de Oliveira; Shalimá Figueirêdo Chaves; Yuri Lopes Lima; Márcio Almeida Bezerra; Gabriel Peixoto Leão Almeida; Pedro Olavo de Paula Lima
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2017-08

6.  Comprehensive movement system screening tool (MSST) for athletes: Development and measurement properties.

Authors:  Courtney M Butowicz; Marisa Pontillo; David Ebaugh; Sheri P Silfies
Journal:  Braz J Phys Ther       Date:  2019-11-01       Impact factor: 3.377

7.  The Interrelationship of Common Clinical Movement Screens: Establishing Population-Specific Norms in a Large Cohort of Military Applicants.

Authors:  Sarah J de la Motte; Timothy C Gribbin; Peter Lisman; Anthony I Beutler; Patricia Deuster
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2016-11-10       Impact factor: 2.860

8.  The relationship between glenohumeral joint total rotational range of motion and the functional movement screen™ shoulder mobility test.

Authors:  Peter A Sprague; G Monique Mokha; Dustin R Gatens; Rudy Rodriguez
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2014-10

9.  THE EFFECTIVENESS OF DRY NEEDLING AND STRETCHING VS. STRETCHING ALONE ON HAMSTRING FLEXIBILITY IN PATIENTS WITH KNEE PAIN: A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL.

Authors:  John S Mason; Michael Crowell; Jeffery Dolbeer; Jamie Morris; Aspen Terry; Shane Koppenhaver; Donald Lee Goss
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2016-10

10.  Performance on the Functional Movement Screen Is Related to Hop Performance But Not to Hip and Knee Strength in Collegiate Football Players.

Authors:  Nienke Willigenburg; Timothy E Hewett
Journal:  Clin J Sport Med       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 3.638

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.