Literature DB >> 28515971

PREDICTION OF FUNCTIONAL MOVEMENT SCREEN™ PERFORMANCE FROM LOWER EXTREMITY RANGE OF MOTION AND CORE TESTS.

Nicole J Chimera1, Shelby Knoeller2, Ron Cooper3, Nicholas Kothe4, Craig Smith5, Meghan Warren6.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There are varied reports in the literature regarding the association of the Functional Movement Screen™ (FMS™) with injury. The FMS™ has been correlated with hamstring range of motion and plank hold times; however, limited research is available on the predictability of lower extremity range of motion (ROM) and core function on FMS™ performance. PURPOSE/HYPOTHESES: The purpose of this study was to examine whether active lower extremity ROM measurements and core functional tests predict FMS™ performance. The authors hypothesized that lower extremity ROM and core functional tests would predict FMS™ composite score (CS) and performance on individual FMS™ fundamental movement patterns. STUDY
DESIGN: Descriptive cohort study.
METHODS: Forty recreationally active participants had active lower extremity ROM measured, performed two core functional tests, the single leg wall sit hold (SLWS) and the repetitive single leg squat (RSLS), and performed the FMS™. Independent t tests were used to assess differences between right and left limb ROM measures and outcomes of core functional tests. Linear and ordinal logistic regressions were used to determine the best predictors of FMS™ CS and fundamental movement patterns, respectively.
RESULTS: On the left side, reduced DF and SLWS significantly predicted lower FMS™ CS. On the right side only reduced DF significantly predicted lower FMS™ CS. Ordinal logistic regression models for the fundamental movement patterns demonstrated that reduced DF ROM was significantly associated with lower performance on deep squat. Reduced left knee extension was significantly associated with better performance in left straight leg raise; while reduced right hip flexion was significantly associated with reduced right straight leg raise. Lower SLWS was associated with reduced trunk stability performance.
CONCLUSIONS: FMS™ movement patterns were affected by lower extremity ROM and core function. Researchers should consider lower FMS™ performance as indicative of underlying issues in ROM and core function. Clinicians may consider ROM interventions and core training strategies to improve FMS™ CS. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 2B.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Dorsiflexion; FMS™; Single leg wall sit; range of motion

Year:  2017        PMID: 28515971      PMCID: PMC5380859     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther        ISSN: 2159-2896


  36 in total

1.  Intra-rater and inter-rater reliability of a weight-bearing lunge measure of ankle dorsiflexion.

Authors:  Kim L Bennell; Richard C Talbot; Henry Wajswelner; Wassana Techovanich; David H Kelly; Andrew J Hall
Journal:  Aust J Physiother       Date:  1998

2.  Deficits in neuromuscular control of the trunk predict knee injury risk: a prospective biomechanical-epidemiologic study.

Authors:  Bohdanna T Zazulak; Timothy E Hewett; N Peter Reeves; Barry Goldberg; Jacek Cholewicki
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2007-04-27       Impact factor: 6.202

3.  Efficacy of functional movement screening for predicting injuries in coast guard cadets.

Authors:  Joseph J Knapik; Ludimila M Cosio-Lima; Katy L Reynolds; Richard S Shumway
Journal:  J Strength Cond Res       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 3.775

4.  The number of subjects per variable required in linear regression analyses.

Authors:  Peter C Austin; Ewout W Steyerberg
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2015-01-22       Impact factor: 6.437

5.  Functional movement screening: the use of fundamental movements as an assessment of function-part 2.

Authors:  Gray Cook; Lee Burton; Barbara J Hoogenboom; Michael Voight
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2014-08

6.  Preseason Functional Movement Screen Component Tests Predict Severe Contact Injuries in Professional Rugby Union Players.

Authors:  Jason C Tee; Jannie F G Klingbiel; Robert Collins; Mike I Lambert; Yoga Coopoo
Journal:  J Strength Cond Res       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 3.775

7.  Relationship between active knee extension and active straight leg raise test measurements.

Authors:  D M Cameron; R W Bohannon
Journal:  J Orthop Sports Phys Ther       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 4.751

8.  The active straight leg raise test and lumbar spine stability.

Authors:  Craig Liebenson; Amy M Karpowicz; Stephen H M Brown; Samuel J Howarth; Stuart M McGill
Journal:  PM R       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 2.298

9.  Association of the Functional Movement Screen with injuries in division I athletes.

Authors:  Meghan Warren; Craig A Smith; Nicole J Chimera
Journal:  J Sport Rehabil       Date:  2014-09-08       Impact factor: 1.931

Review 10.  Evaluation of the Functional Movement Screen as an Injury Prediction Tool Among Active Adult Populations: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Bryan S Dorrel; Terry Long; Scott Shaffer; Gregory D Myer
Journal:  Sports Health       Date:  2015-09-27       Impact factor: 3.843

View more
  4 in total

1.  Functional Movement Screen Task Scores and Joint Range-of-motion: A Construct Validity Study.

Authors:  Cesar A Hincapié; George A Tomlinson; Malinda Hapuarachchi; Tatjana Stankovic; Steven Hirsch; Danielle Carnegie; Doug Richards; David Frost; Tyson A C Beach
Journal:  Int J Sports Med       Date:  2022-01-27       Impact factor: 2.997

Review 2.  Utility of FMS to understand injury incidence in sports: current perspectives.

Authors:  Meghan Warren; Monica R Lininger; Nicole J Chimera; Craig A Smith
Journal:  Open Access J Sports Med       Date:  2018-09-07

3.  Effects of Combination Movement Patterns Quality and Physical Performance on Injuries in Young Athletes.

Authors:  Dawid Koźlenia; Jarosław Domaradzki
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-05-21       Impact factor: 3.390

4.  Prediction and injury risk based on movement patterns and flexibility in a 6-month prospective study among physically active adults.

Authors:  Dawid Koźlenia; Jarosaw Domaradzki
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2021-05-18       Impact factor: 2.984

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.