Literature DB >> 23924891

Factor structure of the functional movement screen in marine officer candidates.

Josh B Kazman1, Jeffrey M Galecki, Peter Lisman, Patricia A Deuster, Francis G OʼConnor.   

Abstract

Functional movement screening (FMS) is a musculoskeletal assessment that is intended to fill a gap between preparticipation examinations and performance tests. Functional movement screening consists of 7 standardized movements involving multiple muscle groups that are rated 0-3 during performance; scores are combined into a final score, which is intended to predict injury risk. This use of a sum-score in this manner assumes that the items are unidimensional and scores are internally consistent, which are measures of internal reliability. Despite research into the FMS' predictive value and interrater reliability, research has not assessed its psychometric properties. The present study is a standard psychometric analysis of the FMS and is the first to assess the internal consistency and factor structure of the FMS, using Cronbach's alpha and exploratory factor analysis (EFA). Using a cohort of 877 male and 57 female Marine officer candidates who performed the FMS, EFA of polychoric correlations with varimax rotation was conducted to explore the structure of the FMS. Tests were repeated on the original scores, which integrated feelings of pain during movement (0-3), and then on scores discounting the pain instruction and based only on the performance (1-3), to determine whether pain ratings affected the factor structure. The average FMS score was 16.7 ± 1.8. Cronbach's alpha was 0.39. Exploratory factor analysis availed 2 components accounting for 21 and 17% and consisting of separate individual movements (shoulder mobility and deep squat, respectively). Analysis on scores discounting pain showed similar results. The factor structures were not interpretable, and the low Cronbach's alpha suggests a lack of internal consistency in FMS sum scores. Results do not offer support for validity of the FMS sum score as a unidimensional construct. In the absence of additional psychometric research, caution is warranted when using the FMS sum score.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 23924891     DOI: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e3182a6dd83

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Strength Cond Res        ISSN: 1064-8011            Impact factor:   3.775


  25 in total

1.  OVERHEAD DEEP SQUAT PERFORMANCE PREDICTS FUNCTIONAL MOVEMENT SCREEN™ SCORE.

Authors:  Daniel R Clifton; Dustin R Grooms; James A Onate
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2015-10

2.  MODIFIED FUNCTIONAL MOVEMENT SCREENING AS A PREDICTOR OF TACTICAL PERFORMANCE POTENTIAL IN RECREATIONALLY ACTIVE ADULTS.

Authors:  Stephen M Glass; Scott E Ross
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2015-10

Review 3.  Reliability and Association with Injury of Movement Screens: A Critical Review.

Authors:  Robert McCunn; Karen Aus der Fünten; Hugh H K Fullagar; Ian McKeown; Tim Meyer
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 11.136

4.  Real-time test-retest and interrater reliability of select physical performance measures in physically active college-aged students.

Authors:  Daniel T Tarara; Eric J Hegedus; Jeffrey B Taylor
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2014-12

5.  LOAD-ENHANCED MOVEMENT QUALITY SCREENING AND TACTICAL ATHLETICISM: AN EXTENSION OF EVIDENCE.

Authors:  Stephen M Glass; Randy J Schmitz; Christopher K Rhea; Scott E Ross
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2017-06

6.  PREDICTION OF FUNCTIONAL MOVEMENT SCREEN™ PERFORMANCE FROM LOWER EXTREMITY RANGE OF MOTION AND CORE TESTS.

Authors:  Nicole J Chimera; Shelby Knoeller; Ron Cooper; Nicholas Kothe; Craig Smith; Meghan Warren
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2017-04

7.  Functional movement screening: the use of fundamental movements as an assessment of function-part 2.

Authors:  Gray Cook; Lee Burton; Barbara J Hoogenboom; Michael Voight
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2014-08

8.  Use of clinical movement screening tests to predict injury in sport.

Authors:  Nicole J Chimera; Meghan Warren
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2016-04-18

9.  Comprehensive movement system screening tool (MSST) for athletes: Development and measurement properties.

Authors:  Courtney M Butowicz; Marisa Pontillo; David Ebaugh; Sheri P Silfies
Journal:  Braz J Phys Ther       Date:  2019-11-01       Impact factor: 3.377

10.  Injury history, sex, and performance on the functional movement screen and Y balance test.

Authors:  Nicole J Chimera; Craig A Smith; Meghan Warren
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2015-03-11       Impact factor: 2.860

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.