Literature DB >> 28217420

ACUTE EFFECTS OF DIFFERENT SELF-MASSAGE VOLUMES ON THE FMS™ OVERHEAD DEEP SQUAT PERFORMANCE.

Estêvão Rios Monteiro1, Jakob Škarabot2, Andrew D Vigotsky3, Amanda Fernandes Brown1, Thiago Matassoli Gomes, Jefferson da Silva Novaes1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The Functional Movement Screen (FMS™) is a battery of tests designed to assess movement competency; the overhead deep squat test, specifically, has been shown to be an accurate predictor of overall FMS™ scores. Self-massage (SM) is a ubiquitous warm-up utilized to increase joint range of motion and, therefore, may be effective for improving performance of the overhead deep squat test.
PURPOSE: To examine how different doses (30, 60, 90, and 120 seconds) of SM of different areas of the body (plantar fascia, latissimus dorsi, and lateral thigh) affects the score obtained on an overhead deep squat test.
METHODS: Twenty recreationally active females were recruited to be tested on four occasions: sessions one and two consisted of baseline testing, session three consisted of SM applied to the lateral thigh, and session four consisted of SM applied to the lateral torso and plantar fascia.
RESULTS: In all SM conditions, at least 90 seconds was required for a change in deep squat score from baseline; therefore, it is concluded that SM the lateral torso, plantar fascia, and lateral thigh for 90 seconds or more are effective interventions for acutely improving overhead deep squat scores.
CONCLUSION: Self-massage appears to be an effective modality for inducing acute improvements in the performance of the FMS™ overhead deep squat in all conditions tested. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2b.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Flexibility; foam rolling; self‐manual therapy; self‐myofascial release; tennis ball

Year:  2017        PMID: 28217420      PMCID: PMC5294950     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther        ISSN: 2159-2896


  31 in total

Review 1.  How reliable are Functional Movement Screening scores? A systematic review of rater reliability.

Authors:  Robert W Moran; Anthony G Schneiders; Katherine M Major; S John Sullivan
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2015-08-27       Impact factor: 13.800

2.  Strength and conditioning practices of United States high school strength and conditioning coaches.

Authors:  Michael D Duehring; Christina R Feldmann; William P Ebben
Journal:  J Strength Cond Res       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 3.775

Review 3.  Integrative training for children and adolescents: techniques and practices for reducing sports-related injuries and enhancing athletic performance.

Authors:  Gregory D Myer; Avery D Faigenbaum; Donald A Chu; Jeff Falkel; Kevin R Ford; Thomas M Best; Timothy E Hewett
Journal:  Phys Sportsmed       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 2.241

4.  Rationale and Clinical Techniques for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury Prevention Among Female Athletes.

Authors:  Gregory D Myer; Kevin R Ford; Timothy E Hewett
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 2.860

5.  Functional movement screening: the use of fundamental movements as an assessment of function-part 2.

Authors:  Gray Cook; Lee Burton; Barbara J Hoogenboom; Michael Voight
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2014-08

6.  SPECIFIC AND CROSS-OVER EFFECTS OF FOAM ROLLING ON ANKLE DORSIFLEXION RANGE OF MOTION.

Authors:  Shane Kelly; Chris Beardsley
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2016-08

7.  Roller-massager application to the quadriceps and knee-joint range of motion and neuromuscular efficiency during a lunge.

Authors:  David J Bradbury-Squires; Jennifer C Noftall; Kathleen M Sullivan; David G Behm; Kevin E Power; Duane C Button
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2014-11-21       Impact factor: 2.860

8.  The mechanisms of manual therapy in the treatment of musculoskeletal pain: a comprehensive model.

Authors:  Joel E Bialosky; Mark D Bishop; Don D Price; Michael E Robinson; Steven Z George
Journal:  Man Ther       Date:  2008-11-21

9.  Pain pressure threshold of a muscle tender spot increases following local and non-local rolling massage.

Authors:  S J Aboodarda; A J Spence; Duane C Button
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2015-09-28       Impact factor: 2.362

10.  The Effect of Foam Rolling Duration on Hamstring Range of Motion.

Authors:  Grace Couture; Dustin Karlik; Stephen C Glass; Brian M Hatzel
Journal:  Open Orthop J       Date:  2015-10-02
View more
  7 in total

Review 1.  Effects of Self-myofascial Release Instruments on Performance and Recovery: An Umbrella Review.

Authors:  Ricardo M Ferreira; Pedro N Martins; Rui S Goncalves
Journal:  Int J Exerc Sci       Date:  2022-06-01

2.  ROLLER MASSAGE: A COMMENTARY ON CLINICAL STANDARDS AND SURVEY OF PHYSICAL THERAPY PROFESSIONALS- PART 1.

Authors:  Scott W Cheatham; Kyle R Stull
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2018-08

3.  ROLLER MASSAGE: SURVEY OF PHYSICAL THERAPY PROFESSIONALS AND A COMMENTARY ON CLINICAL STANDARDS- PART II.

Authors:  Scott W Cheatham; Kyle R Stull; Tony Ambler-Wright
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2018-08

4.  FOUR WEEKS OF ROLLER MASSAGE TRAINING DID NOT IMPACT RANGE OF MOTION, PAIN PRESSURE THRESHOLD, VOLUNTARY CONTRACTILE PROPERTIES OR JUMP PERFORMANCE.

Authors:  Daniel D Hodgson; Camila D Lima; Jonathan L Low; David G Behm
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2018-08

5.  Does the Self-Myofascial Release Affect the Activity of Selected Lower Limb Muscles of Soccer Players?

Authors:  Tomasz Michalski; Tomasz Król; Piotr Michalik; Magdalena Rutkowska; Magdalena Dąbrowska-Galas; Damian Ziaja; Michał Kuszewski
Journal:  J Hum Kinet       Date:  2022-09-08       Impact factor: 2.923

6.  ACUTE EFFECTS OF DIFFERENT ANTERIOR THIGH SELF-MASSAGE ON HIP RANGE-OF-MOTION IN TRAINED MEN.

Authors:  Estêvão Rios Monteiro; Andrew D Vigotsky; Jefferson da Silva Novaes; Jakob Škarabot
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2018-02

7.  Roller Massage: Comparing the Immediate Post-Treatment Effects Between an Instructional Video and a Self-Preferred Program Using Two Different Density-Type Roller Balls.

Authors:  Scott W Cheatham; Kyle R Stull; Wendy N Batts; Tony Ambler-Wright
Journal:  J Hum Kinet       Date:  2020-01-31       Impact factor: 2.193

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.