Literature DB >> 24225032

Prediction of injury by limited and asymmetrical fundamental movement patterns in american football players.

Kyle B Kiesel1, Robert J Butler, Philip J Plisky.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: Previous injury is the strongest risk factor for future injury in sports. It has been proposed that motor-control changes such as movement limitation and asymmetry associated with injury and pain may be perpetuated as part of an individual's movement strategy. Motor control of fundamental 1-×-body-weight tasks can reliably and efficiently be measured in the field.
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether the motor control of fundamental movement patterns and pattern asymmetry have a relationship with time-loss injury over the course of the preseason in professional football.
DESIGN: Injury-risk study.
SETTING: American professional football facilities. PARTICIPANTS: 238 American professional football players. INTERVENTION: To measure the motor control of 1-×-body-weight fundamental movement patterns, Functional Movement Screen scores were obtained before the start of training camp. The previously established cutoff score of ≤14 and the presence of any asymmetries on the FMS were examined using relative risk to determine if a relationship exists with time-loss injury. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Time-loss musculoskeletal injury defined as any time loss from practice or competition due to musculoskeletal injury.
RESULTS: Players who scored ≤14 exhibited a relative risk of 1.87 (CI95 1.202.96). Similarly, players with at least 1 asymmetry displayed a relative risk of 1.80 (CI95 1.112.74). The combination of scoring below the threshold and exhibiting a movement asymmetry was highly specific for injury, with a specificity of .87 (CI95 .84.90).
CONCLUSION: The results of this study suggest that fundamental movement patterns and pattern asymmetry are identifiable risk factors for time-loss injury during the preseason in professional football players.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24225032     DOI: 10.1123/jsr.2012-0130

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Sport Rehabil        ISSN: 1056-6716            Impact factor:   1.931


  41 in total

Review 1.  Reliability and Association with Injury of Movement Screens: A Critical Review.

Authors:  Robert McCunn; Karen Aus der Fünten; Hugh H K Fullagar; Ian McKeown; Tim Meyer
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 11.136

Review 2.  Predicting sport and occupational lower extremity injury risk through movement quality screening: a systematic review.

Authors:  Jackie L Whittaker; Nadine Booysen; Sarah de la Motte; Liz Dennett; Cara L Lewis; Dave Wilson; Carly McKay; Martin Warner; Darin Padua; Carolyn A Emery; Maria Stokes
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2016-12-01       Impact factor: 13.800

3.  PREDICTION OF FUNCTIONAL MOVEMENT SCREEN™ PERFORMANCE FROM LOWER EXTREMITY RANGE OF MOTION AND CORE TESTS.

Authors:  Nicole J Chimera; Shelby Knoeller; Ron Cooper; Nicholas Kothe; Craig Smith; Meghan Warren
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2017-04

4.  Functional movement screening: the use of fundamental movements as an assessment of function-part 2.

Authors:  Gray Cook; Lee Burton; Barbara J Hoogenboom; Michael Voight
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2014-08

5.  Use of clinical movement screening tests to predict injury in sport.

Authors:  Nicole J Chimera; Meghan Warren
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2016-04-18

6.  The Functional Movement Screen as a Predictor of Injury in National Collegiate Athletic Association Division II Athletes.

Authors:  Bryan Dorrel; Terry Long; Scott Shaffer; Gregory D Myer
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2017-12-18       Impact factor: 2.860

7.  Musculoskeletal Screening to Identify Female Collegiate Rowers at Risk for Low Back Pain.

Authors:  Sophia L Gonzalez; Aimee M Diaz; Hillary A Plummer; Lori A Michener
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2018-12-07       Impact factor: 2.860

8.  The Interrelationship of Common Clinical Movement Screens: Establishing Population-Specific Norms in a Large Cohort of Military Applicants.

Authors:  Sarah J de la Motte; Timothy C Gribbin; Peter Lisman; Anthony I Beutler; Patricia Deuster
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2016-11-10       Impact factor: 2.860

9.  Predicting Musculoskeletal Injury in National Collegiate Athletic Association Division II Athletes From Asymmetries and Individual-Test Versus Composite Functional Movement Screen Scores.

Authors:  Monique Mokha; Peter A Sprague; Dustin R Gatens
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2016-01-21       Impact factor: 2.860

10.  Performance on the Functional Movement Screen Is Related to Hop Performance But Not to Hip and Knee Strength in Collegiate Football Players.

Authors:  Nienke Willigenburg; Timothy E Hewett
Journal:  Clin J Sport Med       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 3.638

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.