Literature DB >> 25129329

Unmet demand for highly effective postpartum contraception in Texas.

Joseph E Potter1, Kristine Hopkins2, Abigail R A Aiken3, Celia Hubert2, Amanda J Stevenson2, Kari White4, Daniel Grossman5.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: We aimed to assess women's contraceptive preferences and use in the first 6 months after delivery. The postpartum period represents a key opportunity for women to learn about and obtain effective contraception, especially since 50% of unintended pregnancies to parous women occur within 2 years of a previous birth.
METHODS: We conducted a prospective cohort study of 800 postpartum women recruited from three hospitals in Austin and El Paso, TX. Women aged 18-44 who wanted to delay childbearing for at least 24 months were eligible for the study and completed interviews following delivery and at 3 and 6 months postpartum. Participants were asked about the contraceptive method they were currently using and the method they would prefer to use at 6 months after delivery.
RESULTS: At 6 months postpartum, 13% of women were using an intrauterine device or implant, and 17% were sterilized or had a partner who had had a vasectomy. Twenty-four percent were using hormonal methods, and 45% relied on less effective methods, mainly condoms and withdrawal. Yet 44% reported that they would prefer to be using sterilization, and 34% would prefer to be using long-acting reversible contraception (LARC).
CONCLUSIONS: This study shows a considerable preference for LARC and permanent methods at 6 months postpartum. However, there is a marked discordance between women's method preference and actual use, indicating substantial unmet demand for highly effective methods of contraception. IMPLICATIONS: In two Texas cities, many more women preferred long-acting and permanent contraceptive methods (LAPM) than were able to access these methods at 6 months postpartum. Women's contraceptive needs could be better met by counseling about all methods, by reducing cost barriers and by making LAPM available at more sites.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Female sterilization; Hispanic; LARC; Postpartum contraception; Texas

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25129329      PMCID: PMC4207725          DOI: 10.1016/j.contraception.2014.06.039

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Contraception        ISSN: 0010-7824            Impact factor:   3.051


  28 in total

1.  Reducing unintended pregnancy in the United States.

Authors:  James Trussell; L L Wynn
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2007-12-03       Impact factor: 3.375

2.  Barriers to obtaining a desired postpartum tubal sterilization.

Authors:  Nikki Zite; Sara Wuellner; Melissa Gilliam
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2006-01-17       Impact factor: 3.375

3.  Unintended pregnancy in the United States: incidence and disparities, 2006.

Authors:  Lawrence B Finer; Mia R Zolna
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2011-08-24       Impact factor: 3.375

4.  Effectiveness of long-acting reversible contraception.

Authors:  Brooke Winner; Jeffrey F Peipert; Qiuhong Zhao; Christina Buckel; Tessa Madden; Jenifer E Allsworth; Gina M Secura
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2012-05-24       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Shifts in intended and unintended pregnancies in the United States, 2001-2008.

Authors:  Lawrence B Finer; Mia R Zolna
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2013-12-19       Impact factor: 9.308

6.  One-year follow-up of women with unfulfilled postpartum sterilization requests.

Authors:  Andrea Ries Thurman; Torri Janecek
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 7.661

Review 7.  Strategies to prevent unintended pregnancy: increasing use of long-acting reversible contraception.

Authors:  P D Blumenthal; A Voedisch; K Gemzell-Danielsson
Journal:  Hum Reprod Update       Date:  2010-07-15       Impact factor: 15.610

8.  Factors influencing the provision of long-acting reversible contraception in California.

Authors:  M Antonia Biggs; Cynthia C Harper; Jan Malvin; Claire D Brindis
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 7.661

9.  Changes in use of long-acting contraceptive methods in the United States, 2007-2009.

Authors:  Lawrence B Finer; Jenna Jerman; Megan L Kavanaugh
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2012-07-13       Impact factor: 7.329

10.  Clinical outcomes of early postplacental insertion of intrauterine contraceptive devices.

Authors:  Sevki Celen; Perran Möröy; Ayhan Sucak; Ayla Aktulay; Nuri Danişman
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 3.375

View more
  36 in total

1.  Motivations for Interest, Disinterest and Uncertainty in Intrauterine Device Use Among Young Women.

Authors:  Anu Manchikanti Gomez; Bridget Freihart
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2017-09

2.  Low-Income Texas Women's Experiences Accessing Their Desired Contraceptive Method at the First Postpartum Visit.

Authors:  Kate Coleman-Minahan; Chloe H Dillaway; Caitlin Canfield; Daniela M Kuhn; Katherine S Strandberg; Joseph E Potter
Journal:  Perspect Sex Reprod Health       Date:  2018-12-03

3.  Women's experiences seeking publicly funded family planning services in Texas.

Authors:  Kristine Hopkins; Kari White; Fran Linkin; Celia Hubert; Daniel Grossman; Joseph E Potter
Journal:  Perspect Sex Reprod Health       Date:  2015-01-30

4.  Prevalence and Predictors of Prenatal and Postpartum Contraceptive Counseling in Two Texas Cities.

Authors:  Kate Coleman-Minahan; Abigail R A Aiken; Joseph E Potter
Journal:  Womens Health Issues       Date:  2017-06-27

5.  Unplanned pregnancy and contraceptive use in Hull and East Yorkshire.

Authors:  Helen Bexhell; Kate Guthrie; Kelly Cleland; James Trussell
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2015-10-28       Impact factor: 3.375

6.  Inpatient Postpartum Long-Acting Reversible Contraception and Sterilization in the United States, 2008-2013.

Authors:  Michelle H Moniz; Tammy Chang; Michele Heisler; Lindsay Admon; Acham Gebremariam; Vanessa K Dalton; Matthew M Davis
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 7.661

7.  Contraception After Delivery Among Publicly Insured Women in Texas: Use Compared With Preference.

Authors:  Joseph E Potter; Kate Coleman-Minahan; Kari White; Daniel A Powers; Chloe Dillaway; Amanda J Stevenson; Kristine Hopkins; Daniel Grossman
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 7.661

8.  Medicaid and fulfillment of desired postpartum sterilization.

Authors:  Kavita Shah Arora; Barbara Wilkinson; Emily Verbus; Mary Montague; Jane Morris; Mustafa Ascha; Brian M Mercer
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2018-02-25       Impact factor: 3.375

9.  The Availability and Use of Postpartum LARC in Mexico and Among Hispanics in the United States.

Authors:  Joseph E Potter; Celia Hubert; Kari White
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2017-09

10.  US family physicians' intrauterine and implantable contraception provision: results from a national survey.

Authors:  Mollie B Nisen; Lars E Peterson; Anneli Cochrane; Susan E Rubin
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2016-01-14       Impact factor: 3.375

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.