Literature DB >> 25128792

Is it or isn't it: listeners make rapid use of prosody to infer speaker meanings.

Chigusa Kurumada1, Meredith Brown2, Sarah Bibyk2, Daniel F Pontillo2, Michael K Tanenhaus2.   

Abstract

A visual world experiment examined the time course for pragmatic inferences derived from visual context and contrastive intonation contours. We used the construction It looks like an X pronounced with either (a) a H(*) pitch accent on the final noun and a low boundary tone, or (b) a contrastive L+H(*) pitch accent and a rising boundary tone, a contour that can support contrastive inference (e.g., It LOOKSL+H*like a zebraL-H%… (but it is not)). When the visual display contained a single related set of contrasting pictures (e.g. a zebra vs. a zebra-like animal), effects of LOOKSL+H* emerged prior to the processing of phonemic information from the target noun. The results indicate that the prosodic processing is incremental and guided by contextually-supported expectations. Additional analyses ruled out explanations based on context-independent heuristics that might substitute for online computation of contrast.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Contrastive accent; Pragmatic inference; Prosody; Visual world eye-tracking

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25128792      PMCID: PMC4163505          DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2014.05.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cognition        ISSN: 0010-0277


  26 in total

1.  Eye movements and lexical access in spoken-language comprehension: evaluating a linking hypothesis between fixations and linguistic processing.

Authors:  M K Tanenhaus; J S Magnuson; D Dahan; C Chambers
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2000-11

2.  Expectation-based syntactic comprehension.

Authors:  Roger Levy
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2007-07-30

Review 3.  The P-chain: relating sentence production and its disorders to comprehension and acquisition.

Authors:  Gary S Dell; Franklin Chang
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2013-12-09       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  Syntactic ambiguity resolution in discourse: modeling the effects of referential context and lexical frequency.

Authors:  M J Spivey; M K Tanenhaus
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 3.051

5.  Evidence for implicit learning in syntactic comprehension.

Authors:  Alex B Fine; T Florian Jaeger
Journal:  Cogn Sci       Date:  2013-01-30

6.  Incremental interpretation at verbs: restricting the domain of subsequent reference.

Authors:  G T Altmann; Y Kamide
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1999-12-17

7.  Scalar reference, contrast and discourse: Separating effects of linguistic discourse from availability of the referent.

Authors:  Lynsey Wolter; Kristen Skovbroten Gorman; Michael K Tanenhaus
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2011-10-01       Impact factor: 3.059

8.  Alignment as a consequence of expectation adaptation: syntactic priming is affected by the prime's prediction error given both prior and recent experience.

Authors:  T Florian Jaeger; Neal E Snider
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2013-01-23

9.  Immediate effects of anticipatory coarticulation in spoken-word recognition.

Authors:  Anne Pier Salverda; Dave Kleinschmidt; Michael K Tanenhaus
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2014-02-01       Impact factor: 3.059

10.  Online interpretation of scalar quantifiers: insight into the semantics-pragmatics interface.

Authors:  Yi Ting Huang; Jesse Snedeker
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  2008-11-01       Impact factor: 3.468

View more
  10 in total

1.  Listeners consider alternative speaker productions in discourse comprehension and memory: Evidence from beat gesture and pitch accenting.

Authors:  Laura M Morett; Scott H Fraundorf
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2019-11

2.  Effects of distributional information on categorization of prosodic contours.

Authors:  Chigusa Kurumada; Meredith Brown; Michael K Tanenhaus
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2018-06

Review 3.  Eyes and ears: Using eye tracking and pupillometry to understand challenges to speech recognition.

Authors:  Kristin J Van Engen; Drew J McLaughlin
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2018-05-04       Impact factor: 3.208

4.  Accents, Not Just Prosodic Boundaries, Influence Syntactic Attachment.

Authors:  Katy Carlson; Joseph C Tyler
Journal:  Lang Speech       Date:  2017-07-07       Impact factor: 1.500

5.  What do we mean by prediction in language comprehension?

Authors:  Gina R Kuperberg; T Florian Jaeger
Journal:  Lang Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2015-11-13       Impact factor: 2.331

6.  Processing of Prosody and Semantics in Sepedi and L2 English.

Authors:  Giuseppina Turco; Sabine Zerbian
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2021-01-04

7.  Eye see what you're saying: Contrastive use of beat gesture and pitch accent affects online interpretation of spoken discourse.

Authors:  Laura M Morett; Scott H Fraundorf; James C McPartland
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2021-02-04       Impact factor: 3.140

8.  Contrast Is in the Eye of the Beholder: Infelicitous Beat Gesture Increases Cognitive Load During Online Spoken Discourse Comprehension.

Authors:  Laura M Morett; Jennifer M Roche; Scott H Fraundorf; James C McPartland
Journal:  Cogn Sci       Date:  2020-10

9.  Evidence For Selective Adaptation and Recalibration in the Perception of Lexical Stress.

Authors:  Hans Rutger Bosker
Journal:  Lang Speech       Date:  2021-07-06       Impact factor: 1.835

10.  The Effects of Lexical Pitch Accent on Infant Word Recognition in Japanese.

Authors:  Mitsuhiko Ota; Naoto Yamane; Reiko Mazuka
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-01-12
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.