Literature DB >> 29801981

Eyes and ears: Using eye tracking and pupillometry to understand challenges to speech recognition.

Kristin J Van Engen1, Drew J McLaughlin2.   

Abstract

Although human speech recognition is often experienced as relatively effortless, a number of common challenges can render the task more difficult. Such challenges may originate in talkers (e.g., unfamiliar accents, varying speech styles), the environment (e.g. noise), or in listeners themselves (e.g., hearing loss, aging, different native language backgrounds). Each of these challenges can reduce the intelligibility of spoken language, but even when intelligibility remains high, they can place greater processing demands on listeners. Noisy conditions, for example, can lead to poorer recall for speech, even when it has been correctly understood. Speech intelligibility measures, memory tasks, and subjective reports of listener difficulty all provide critical information about the effects of such challenges on speech recognition. Eye tracking and pupillometry complement these methods by providing objective physiological measures of online cognitive processing during listening. Eye tracking records the moment-to-moment direction of listeners' visual attention, which is closely time-locked to unfolding speech signals, and pupillometry measures the moment-to-moment size of listeners' pupils, which dilate in response to increased cognitive load. In this paper, we review the uses of these two methods for studying challenges to speech recognition.
Copyright © 2018. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Eye tracking; Listening effort; Pupillometry; Speech recognition

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29801981      PMCID: PMC7101020          DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2018.04.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hear Res        ISSN: 0378-5955            Impact factor:   3.208


  90 in total

1.  Sink positive: linguistic experience with th substitutions influences nonnative word recognition.

Authors:  Adriana Hanulíková; Andrea Weber
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 2.199

2.  The Effect of Residual Acoustic Hearing and Adaptation to Uncertainty on Speech Perception in Cochlear Implant Users: Evidence From Eye-Tracking.

Authors:  Bob McMurray; Ashley Farris-Trimble; Michael Seedorff; Hannah Rigler
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2016 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.570

3.  The role of prosody in the interpretation of structural ambiguities: a study of anticipatory eye movements.

Authors:  Andrea Weber; Martine Grice; Matthew W Crocker
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2005-09-12

4.  Anticipatory effects of intonation: Eye movements during instructed visual search.

Authors:  Kiwako Ito; Shari R Speer
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 3.059

5.  Hearing Impairment and Cognitive Energy: The Framework for Understanding Effortful Listening (FUEL).

Authors:  M Kathleen Pichora-Fuller; Sophia E Kramer; Mark A Eckert; Brent Edwards; Benjamin W Y Hornsby; Larry E Humes; Ulrike Lemke; Thomas Lunner; Mohan Matthen; Carol L Mackersie; Graham Naylor; Natalie A Phillips; Michael Richter; Mary Rudner; Mitchell S Sommers; Kelly L Tremblay; Arthur Wingfield
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2016 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.570

6.  How hearing aids, background noise, and visual cues influence objective listening effort.

Authors:  Erin M Picou; Todd A Ricketts; Benjamin W Y Hornsby
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 3.570

7.  The Temporal Dynamics of Spoken Word Recognition in Adverse Listening Conditions.

Authors:  Susanne Brouwer; Ann R Bradlow
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2016-10

8.  The developing constraints on parsing decisions: the role of lexical-biases and referential scenes in child and adult sentence processing.

Authors:  Jesse Snedeker; John C Trueswell
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 9.  The Neural Consequences of Age-Related Hearing Loss.

Authors:  Jonathan E Peelle; Arthur Wingfield
Journal:  Trends Neurosci       Date:  2016-06-01       Impact factor: 13.837

10.  Neural systems underlying lexical competition: an eye tracking and fMRI study.

Authors:  Giulia Righi; Sheila E Blumstein; John Mertus; Michael S Worden
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 3.225

View more
  2 in total

1.  The Two Sides of Linguistic Context: Eye-Tracking as a Measure of Semantic Competition in Spoken Word Recognition Among Younger and Older Adults.

Authors:  Nicolai D Ayasse; Arthur Wingfield
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2020-04-09       Impact factor: 3.169

2.  Degree of Language Experience Modulates Visual Attention to Visible Speech and Iconic Gestures During Clear and Degraded Speech Comprehension.

Authors:  Linda Drijvers; Julija Vaitonytė; Asli Özyürek
Journal:  Cogn Sci       Date:  2019-10
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.