Literature DB >> 21927536

Scalar reference, contrast and discourse: Separating effects of linguistic discourse from availability of the referent.

Lynsey Wolter1, Kristen Skovbroten Gorman, Michael K Tanenhaus.   

Abstract

Listeners expect that a definite noun phrase with a pre-nominal scalar adjective (e.g., the big …) will refer to an entity that is part of a set of objects contrasting on the scalar dimension, e.g., size (Sedivy, Tanenhaus, Chambers & Carlson, 1999). Two visual world experiments demonstrate that uttering a referring expression with a scalar adjective makes all members of the relevant contrast set more salient in the discourse model, facilitating subsequent reference to other members of that contrast set. Moreover, this discourse effect is caused primarily by linguistic mention of a scalar adjective and not by the listener's prior visual or perceptual experience. These experiments demonstrate that language processing is sensitive to which information was introduced by linguistic mention, and that the visual world paradigm can be use to tease apart the separate contributions of visual and linguistic information to reference resolution.

Entities:  

Year:  2011        PMID: 21927536      PMCID: PMC3171752          DOI: 10.1016/j.jml.2011.04.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mem Lang        ISSN: 0749-596X            Impact factor:   3.059


  31 in total

1.  Hearing lips and seeing voices.

Authors:  H McGurk; J MacDonald
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1976 Dec 23-30       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  The role of discourse context in the processing of a flexible word-order language.

Authors:  Elsi Kaiser; John C Trueswell
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2004-12

3.  Don't talk about pink elephants! Speaker's control over leaking private information during language production.

Authors:  Liane Wardlow Lane; Michelle Groisman; Victor S Ferreira
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2006-04

4.  THE SYNTAX-DISCOURSE DIVIDE: PROCESSING ELLIPSIS.

Authors:  Lyn Frazier; Charles Clifton
Journal:  Syntax       Date:  2005-08

5.  Learning to attend: a connectionist model of situated language comprehension.

Authors:  Marshall R Mayberry; Matthew W Crocker; Pia Knoeferle
Journal:  Cogn Sci       Date:  2009-05

6.  The coordinated interplay of scene, utterance, and world knowledge: evidence from eye tracking.

Authors:  Pia Knoeferle; Matthew W Crocker
Journal:  Cogn Sci       Date:  2006-05-06

7.  The kindergarten-path effect: studying on-line sentence processing in young children.

Authors:  J C Trueswell; I Sekerina; N M Hill; M L Logrip
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1999-12-07

Review 8.  Eye movements as a window into real-time spoken language comprehension in natural contexts.

Authors:  K M Eberhard; M J Spivey-Knowlton; J C Sedivy; M K Tanenhaus
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  1995-11

9.  Little houses and casas pequeñas: message formulation and syntactic form in unscripted speech with speakers of English and Spanish.

Authors:  Sarah Brown-Schmidt; Agnieszka E Konopka
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2008-10-07

10.  Discourse-mediation of the mapping between language and the visual world: eye movements and mental representation.

Authors:  Gerry T M Altmann; Yuki Kamide
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2009-02-03
View more
  10 in total

1.  What happened (and what didn't): Discourse constraints on encoding of plausible alternatives.

Authors:  Scott H Fraundorf; Aaron S Benjamin; Duane G Watson
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2013-10-01       Impact factor: 3.059

2.  Is it or isn't it: listeners make rapid use of prosody to infer speaker meanings.

Authors:  Chigusa Kurumada; Meredith Brown; Sarah Bibyk; Daniel F Pontillo; Michael K Tanenhaus
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2014-08-14

Review 3.  Eyes and ears: Using eye tracking and pupillometry to understand challenges to speech recognition.

Authors:  Kristin J Van Engen; Drew J McLaughlin
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2018-05-04       Impact factor: 3.208

4.  Context-driven expectations about focus alternatives.

Authors:  Christina S Kim; Christine Gunlogson; Michael K Tanenhaus; Jeffrey T Runner
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2015-03-19

5.  Inferring Difficulty: Flexibility in the Real-time Processing of Disfluency.

Authors:  Daphna Heller; Jennifer E Arnold; Natalie Klein; Michael K Tanenhaus
Journal:  Lang Speech       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 1.500

6.  Restrictive vs. non-restrictive composition: a magnetoencephalography study.

Authors:  Timothy Leffel; Miriam Lauter; Masha Westerlund; Liina Pylkkänen
Journal:  Lang Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2014-09-16       Impact factor: 2.331

7.  Online pragmatic interpretations of scalar adjectives are affected by perceived speaker reliability.

Authors:  Bethany Gardner; Sadie Dix; Rebecca Lawrence; Cameron Morgan; Anaclare Sullivan; Chigusa Kurumada
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-02-19       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  The effect of linguistic and visual salience in visual world studies.

Authors:  Federica Cavicchio; David Melcher; Massimo Poesio
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-03-04

9.  What's in a Name? Interlocutors Dynamically Update Expectations about Shared Names.

Authors:  Whitney M Gegg-Harrison; Michael K Tanenhaus
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-02-26

10.  Talker-Specific Generalization of Pragmatic Inferences based on Under- and Over-Informative Prenominal Adjective Use.

Authors:  Amanda Pogue; Chigusa Kurumada; Michael K Tanenhaus
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-01-20
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.