Literature DB >> 25128431

Dissociating the influence of response selection and task anticipation on corticospinal suppression during response preparation.

Julie Duque1, Ludovica Labruna2, Christian Cazares2, Richard B Ivry2.   

Abstract

Motor behavior requires selecting between potential actions. The role of inhibition in response selection has frequently been examined in tasks in which participants are engaged in some advance preparation prior to the presentation of an imperative signal. Under such conditions, inhibition could be related to processes associated with response selection, or to more general inhibitory processes that are engaged in high states of anticipation. In Experiment 1, we manipulated the degree of anticipatory preparation. Participants performed a choice reaction time task that required choosing between a movement of the left or right index finger, and used transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) to elicit motor evoked potentials (MEPs) in the left hand agonist. In high anticipation blocks, a non-informative cue (e.g., fixation marker) preceded the imperative; in low anticipation blocks, there was no cue and participants were required to divide their attention between two tasks to further reduce anticipation. MEPs were substantially reduced before the imperative signal in high anticipation blocks. In contrast, in low anticipation blocks, MEPs remained unchanged before the imperative signal but showed a marked suppression right after the onset of the imperative. This effect occurred regardless of whether the imperative had signalled a left or right hand response. After this initial inhibition, left MEPs increased when the left hand was selected and remained suppressed when the right hand was selected. We obtained similar results in Experiment 2 except that the persistent left MEP suppression when the left hand was not selected was attenuated when the alternative response involved a non-homologous effector (right foot). These results indicate that, even in the absence of an anticipatory period, inhibitory mechanisms are engaged during response selection, possibly to prevent the occurrence of premature and inappropriate responses during a competitive selection process.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Action selection; Competition resolution; Impulse control; Inhibition; Motor preparation; Movement; Transcranial magnetic stimulation

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25128431      PMCID: PMC4259874          DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2014.08.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuropsychologia        ISSN: 0028-3932            Impact factor:   3.139


  41 in total

1.  Human corticospinal excitability evaluated with transcranial magnetic stimulation during different reaction time paradigms.

Authors:  L Leocani; L G Cohen; E M Wassermann; K Ikoma; M Hallett
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 13.501

2.  Loss aversion and inhibition in dynamical models of multialternative choice.

Authors:  Marius Usher; James L McClelland
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 8.934

Review 3.  Making decisions through a distributed consensus.

Authors:  Paul Cisek
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2012-06-08       Impact factor: 6.627

4.  Transcranial magnetic stimulation of posterior parietal cortex affects decisions of hand choice.

Authors:  Flavio T P Oliveira; Jörn Diedrichsen; Timothy Verstynen; Julie Duque; Richard B Ivry
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-09-27       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 5.  The neural basis of inhibition in cognitive control.

Authors:  Adam R Aron
Journal:  Neuroscientist       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 7.519

6.  Role of corticospinal suppression during motor preparation.

Authors:  Julie Duque; Richard B Ivry
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2009-01-06       Impact factor: 5.357

7.  Memory formation in the motor cortex ipsilateral to a training hand.

Authors:  J Duque; R Mazzocchio; K Stefan; F Hummel; E Olivier; Leonardo G Cohen
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2007-10-10       Impact factor: 5.357

8.  Influence of reward on corticospinal excitability during movement preparation.

Authors:  Pierre-Alexandre Klein; Etienne Olivier; Julie Duque
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-12-12       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  A probabilistic strategy for understanding action selection.

Authors:  Byounghoon Kim; Michele A Basso
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-02-10       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Evidence for two concurrent inhibitory mechanisms during response preparation.

Authors:  Julie Duque; David Lew; Riccardo Mazzocchio; Etienne Olivier; Richard B Ivry
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-03-10       Impact factor: 6.167

View more
  19 in total

Review 1.  The uses and interpretations of the motor-evoked potential for understanding behaviour.

Authors:  Sven Bestmann; John W Krakauer
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-01-07       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Inhibition during response preparation is sensitive to response complexity.

Authors:  Ian Greenhouse; Dylan Saks; Timothy Hoang; Richard B Ivry
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-02-25       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Motor cortex disruption delays motor processes but not deliberation about action choices.

Authors:  Gerard Derosiere; David Thura; Paul Cisek; Julie Duque
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2019-08-14       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 4.  Physiological Markers of Motor Inhibition during Human Behavior.

Authors:  Julie Duque; Ian Greenhouse; Ludovica Labruna; Richard B Ivry
Journal:  Trends Neurosci       Date:  2017-03-21       Impact factor: 13.837

5.  Planning face, hand, and leg movements: anatomical constraints on preparatory inhibition.

Authors:  Ludovica Labruna; Claudia Tischler; Christian Cazares; Ian Greenhouse; Julie Duque; Florent Lebon; Richard B Ivry
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2019-02-20       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 6.  Inhibition for gain modulation in the motor system.

Authors:  Ian Greenhouse
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2022-03-26       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Deficient inhibition in alcohol-dependence: let's consider the role of the motor system!

Authors:  Caroline Quoilin; Emmanuelle Wilhelm; Pierre Maurage; Philippe de Timary; Julie Duque
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2018-04-26       Impact factor: 7.853

8.  Comparison of the two cerebral hemispheres in inhibitory processes operative during movement preparation.

Authors:  Pierre-Alexandre Klein; Julie Duque; Ludovica Labruna; Richard B Ivry
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2015-10-14       Impact factor: 6.556

9.  Nonspecific Inhibition of the Motor System during Response Preparation.

Authors:  Ian Greenhouse; Ana Sias; Ludovica Labruna; Richard B Ivry
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2015-07-29       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 10.  The Pause-then-Cancel model of human action-stopping: Theoretical considerations and empirical evidence.

Authors:  Darcy A Diesburg; Jan R Wessel
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2021-07-19       Impact factor: 9.052

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.