Literature DB >> 31411932

Motor cortex disruption delays motor processes but not deliberation about action choices.

Gerard Derosiere1, David Thura2, Paul Cisek3, Julie Duque1.   

Abstract

Decisions about actions typically involve a period of deliberation that ends with the commitment to a choice and the motor processes overtly expressing that choice. Previous studies have shown that neural activity in sensorimotor areas, including the primary motor cortex (M1), correlates with deliberation features during action selection. However, the causal contribution of these areas to the decision process remains unclear. Here, we investigated whether M1 determines choice commitment or whether it simply reflects decision signals coming from upstream structures and instead mainly contributes to the motor processes that follow commitment. To do so, we tested the impact of a disruption of M1 activity, induced by continuous theta burst stimulation (cTBS), on the behavior of human subjects in 1) a simple reaction time (SRT) task allowing us to estimate the duration of the motor processes and 2) a modified version of the tokens task (Cisek P, Puskas GA, El-Murr S. J Neurosci 29: 11560-11571, 2009), which allowed us to estimate subjects' time of commitment as well as accuracy criterion. The efficiency of cTBS was attested by a reduction in motor evoked potential amplitudes following M1 disruption compared with those following a sham stimulation. Furthermore, M1 cTBS lengthened SRTs, indicating that motor processes were perturbed by the intervention. Importantly, all of the behavioral results in the tokens task were similar following M1 disruption and sham stimulation, suggesting that the contribution of M1 to the deliberation process is potentially negligible. Taken together, these findings favor the view that M1 contribution is downstream of the decision process.NEW & NOTEWORTHY Decisions between actions are ubiquitous in the animal realm. Deliberation during action choices entails changes in the activity of the sensorimotor areas controlling those actions, but the causal role of these areas is still often debated. With the use of continuous theta burst stimulation, we show that disrupting the primary motor cortex (M1) delays the motor processes that follow instructed commitment but does not alter volitional deliberation, suggesting that M1 contribution may be downstream of the decision process.

Entities:  

Keywords:  TMS; action selection; motor cortex; movement preparation; urgency

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31411932      PMCID: PMC6843092          DOI: 10.1152/jn.00163.2019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  71 in total

1.  Similar scaling of contralateral and ipsilateral cortical responses during graded unimanual force generation.

Authors:  G Derosière; F Alexandre; N Bourdillon; K Mandrick; T E Ward; S Perrey
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2013-02-13       Impact factor: 6.556

2.  Dissociating the role of prefrontal and premotor cortices in controlling inhibitory mechanisms during motor preparation.

Authors:  Julie Duque; Ludovica Labruna; Sophie Verset; Etienne Olivier; Richard B Ivry
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-01-18       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Decision and action planning signals in human posterior parietal cortex during delayed perceptual choices.

Authors:  Annalisa Tosoni; Maurizio Corbetta; Cinzia Calluso; Giorgia Committeri; Giovanni Pezzulo; G L Romani; Gaspare Galati
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2014-03-11       Impact factor: 3.386

4.  Towards assessing corticospinal excitability bilaterally: Validation of a double-coil TMS method.

Authors:  Julien Grandjean; Gerard Derosiere; Pierre Vassiliadis; Louise Quemener; Ysaline de Wilde; Julie Duque
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2017-09-27       Impact factor: 2.390

5.  Deciding not to decide: computational and neural evidence for hidden behavior in sequential choice.

Authors:  Sebastian Gluth; Jörg Rieskamp; Christian Büchel
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2013-10-31       Impact factor: 4.475

6.  Intra- and Inter-Regional Priming of Ipsilateral Human Primary Motor Cortex With Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation Does Not Induce Consistent Neuroplastic Effects.

Authors:  Michael Do; Melissa Kirkovski; Charlotte B Davies; Soukayna Bekkali; Linda K Byrne; Peter G Enticott
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2018-03-29       Impact factor: 3.169

7.  Using a Double-Coil TMS Protocol to Assess Preparatory Inhibition Bilaterally.

Authors:  Pierre Vassiliadis; Julien Grandjean; Gerard Derosiere; Ysaline de Wilde; Louise Quemener; Julie Duque
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2018-03-08       Impact factor: 4.677

8.  Decisions are expedited through multiple neural adjustments spanning the sensorimotor hierarchy.

Authors:  Natalie A Steinemann; Redmond G O'Connell; Simon P Kelly
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2018-09-07       Impact factor: 14.919

9.  Theta burst stimulation applied over primary motor and somatosensory cortices produces analgesia unrelated to the changes in nociceptive event-related potentials.

Authors:  Diana M E Torta; Valéry Legrain; Maxime Algoet; Etienne Olivier; Julie Duque; André Mouraux
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-08-20       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Comparison of Motor Inhibition in Variants of the Instructed-Delay Choice Reaction Time Task.

Authors:  Caroline Quoilin; Julien Lambert; Benvenuto Jacob; Pierre-Alexandre Klein; Julie Duque
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-08-31       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  5 in total

1.  Post-error Slowing Reflects the Joint Impact of Adaptive and Maladaptive Processes During Decision Making.

Authors:  Fanny Fievez; Gerard Derosiere; Frederick Verbruggen; Julie Duque
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2022-06-09       Impact factor: 3.473

2.  Hasty sensorimotor decisions rely on an overlap of broad and selective changes in motor activity.

Authors:  Gerard Derosiere; David Thura; Paul Cisek; Julie Duque
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2022-04-07       Impact factor: 9.593

3.  A TMS study of preparatory suppression in binge drinkers.

Authors:  Julien Grandjean; Julie Duque
Journal:  Neuroimage Clin       Date:  2020-08-13       Impact factor: 4.881

4.  Transient neuronal suppression for exploitation of new sensory evidence.

Authors:  Maxwell Shinn; Daeyeol Lee; John D Murray; Hyojung Seo
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2022-01-10       Impact factor: 17.694

5.  The role of the primary motor cortex in motor imagery: A theta burst stimulation study.

Authors:  Pamela Barhoun; Ian Fuelscher; Michael Do; Jason L He; Andris Cerins; Soukayna Bekkali; George J Youssef; Daniel Corp; Brendan P Major; Dwayne Meaney; Peter G Enticott; Christian Hyde
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2022-05-03       Impact factor: 4.348

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.