A Willms1, C Güsgen, S Schaaf, D Bieler, M von Websky, R Schwab. 1. Department of General, Visceral and Thoracic Surgery, German Armed Forces Central Hospital of Koblenz, Ruebenacher Strasse 170, 56072, Koblenz, Germany, ArnulfWillms@gmx.de.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The open abdomen has become an accepted treatment option of critically ill patients with severe intra-abdominal conditions. Fascial closure is a particular challenge in patients with peritonitis. This study investigates whether fascial closure rates can be increased in peritonitis patients by using an algorithm that combines vacuum-assisted wound closure and mesh-mediated fascial traction. Moreover, fascial closure rates for patients with peritonitis, trauma or abdominal compartment system (ACS) are compared. METHODS: Data were collected prospectively from all patients who underwent open abdomen management at our institution from 2006 to 2012. All patients were treated under a standardised algorithm that combines vacuum-assisted closure and mesh placement at the fascial level. RESULTS: During the study period, 53 patients (mean age 53 years) underwent open abdomen management for a mean duration of 15 days. Indications for leaving the abdomen open were peritonitis (51 %), trauma (26 %), and ACS or abdominal wall dehiscence (23 %). The fascial closure rate was 79 % in an intention-to-treat analysis and 89 % in a per-protocol analysis. Mortality was 13 %. No patient developed an enteroatmospheric fistula or abdominal wall dehiscence after closure. The mean duration of treatment was significantly longer in peritonitis patients (20 days) than in patients without peritonitis (10 days) (p = 0.03). There were no significant differences in fascial closure rates between patients with peritonitis (87 %), trauma (85 %), and ACS or abdominal wall dehiscence (100 %) (p = 0.647). CONCLUSIONS: Regardless of the underlying pathology, high fascial closure rates can be achieved using a combination of vacuum-assisted closure and mesh-mediated fascial traction.
BACKGROUND: The open abdomen has become an accepted treatment option of critically illpatients with severe intra-abdominal conditions. Fascial closure is a particular challenge in patients with peritonitis. This study investigates whether fascial closure rates can be increased in peritonitispatients by using an algorithm that combines vacuum-assisted wound closure and mesh-mediated fascial traction. Moreover, fascial closure rates for patients with peritonitis, trauma or abdominal compartment system (ACS) are compared. METHODS: Data were collected prospectively from all patients who underwent open abdomen management at our institution from 2006 to 2012. All patients were treated under a standardised algorithm that combines vacuum-assisted closure and mesh placement at the fascial level. RESULTS: During the study period, 53 patients (mean age 53 years) underwent open abdomen management for a mean duration of 15 days. Indications for leaving the abdomen open were peritonitis (51 %), trauma (26 %), and ACS or abdominal wall dehiscence (23 %). The fascial closure rate was 79 % in an intention-to-treat analysis and 89 % in a per-protocol analysis. Mortality was 13 %. No patient developed an enteroatmospheric fistula or abdominal wall dehiscence after closure. The mean duration of treatment was significantly longer in peritonitispatients (20 days) than in patients without peritonitis (10 days) (p = 0.03). There were no significant differences in fascial closure rates between patients with peritonitis (87 %), trauma (85 %), and ACS or abdominal wall dehiscence (100 %) (p = 0.647). CONCLUSIONS: Regardless of the underlying pathology, high fascial closure rates can be achieved using a combination of vacuum-assisted closure and mesh-mediated fascial traction.
Authors: Joseph J Dubose; Thomas M Scalea; John B Holcomb; Binod Shrestha; Obi Okoye; Kenji Inaba; Tiffany K Bee; Timothy C Fabian; James Whelan; Rao R Ivatury Journal: J Trauma Acute Care Surg Date: 2013-01 Impact factor: 3.313
Authors: Daniel Perez; Stefan Wildi; Nicolas Demartines; Matthias Bramkamp; Christian Koehler; Pierre-Alain Clavien Journal: J Am Coll Surg Date: 2007-10 Impact factor: 6.113
Authors: M López-Cano; J M García-Alamino; S A Antoniou; D Bennet; U A Dietz; F Ferreira; R H Fortelny; P Hernandez-Granados; M Miserez; A Montgomery; S Morales-Conde; F Muysoms; J A Pereira; R Schwab; N Slater; A Vanlander; G H Van Ramshorst; F Berrevoet Journal: Hernia Date: 2018-09-03 Impact factor: 4.739
Authors: A Willms; F Muysoms; C Güsgen; R Schwab; J Lock; S Schaaf; C Germer; I Richardsen; U Dietz Journal: Hernia Date: 2017-01-16 Impact factor: 4.739
Authors: U Petersson; T Bjarnason; M Björck; A Montgomery; P Rogmark; M Svensson; K Sörelius; S Acosta Journal: Hernia Date: 2016-06-21 Impact factor: 4.739
Authors: A Willms; S Schaaf; R Schwab; I Richardsen; C Jänig; D Bieler; B Wagner; C Güsgen Journal: Langenbecks Arch Surg Date: 2017-04-05 Impact factor: 3.445
Authors: Arnulf Willms; Christoph Güsgen; Robert Schwab; Rolf Lefering; Sebastian Schaaf; Johan Lock; Erwin Kollig; Christoph Jänig; Dan Bieler Journal: Langenbecks Arch Surg Date: 2021-10-05 Impact factor: 3.445
Authors: Michaela Ramser; Philippe M Glauser; Tracy R Glass; Benjamin Weixler; Martin T R Grapow; Henry Hoffmann; Philipp Kirchhoff Journal: World J Surg Date: 2021-01-22 Impact factor: 3.352