Literature DB >> 17903734

Prospective evaluation of vacuum-assisted closure in abdominal compartment syndrome and severe abdominal sepsis.

Daniel Perez1, Stefan Wildi, Nicolas Demartines, Matthias Bramkamp, Christian Koehler, Pierre-Alain Clavien.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Open abdomen treatment because of severe abdominal sepsis and abdominal compartment syndrome remains a difficult task. Different surgical techniques are available and are often used according to the surgeon's personal experience. Recently, the abdominal vacuum-assisted closure (VAC) system has been introduced, providing a new possibility to treat an open abdomen. In this study, we evaluate the role of this treatment option. STUDY
DESIGN: This prospective observational cohort study includes 37 consecutive patients who were temporarily treated with VAC for severe abdominal sepsis or abdominal compartment syndrome, or both. Patients with abdominal trauma were excluded from the study. Thirty-seven patients undergoing major elective laparotomy and primary abdominal closure served as control group. Primary end points were fascial closure rate, physicoemotional recovery, and appearance outcomes 1 year after closure. Secondary end points included mortality, duration of open abdomen, length of ICU stay, and hospitalization time.
RESULTS: Abdomens were left open for 23 days (range 3 to 122 days) with 3.8 dressing changes (range 1 to 22) per patient. Abdominal closure was achieved in 70% (n = 26), with no marked relation to duration of open abdomen treatment (p > 0.05). After 3 months, patients with VAC treatment recovered to a physical and mental health status similar to patients in the control group (p > 0.05). This status remained stable until the end of the study. Aesthetic outcomes (according to the Vancouver Scar Scale) were considerably poorer in the VAC group compared with controls (p < 0.01).
CONCLUSIONS: Treatment of laparostomy with VAC for abdominal sepsis and abdominal compartment syndrome results in a high rate of successful abdominal closure. In addition, patients recover more rapidly, although hypertrophic scars might interfere with body perception. We recommend abdominal VAC system as first option if open abdomen treatment is indicated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17903734     DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2007.05.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Surg        ISSN: 1072-7515            Impact factor:   6.113


  54 in total

1.  The effect of negative wound pressure therapy on haemodynamics in a laparostomy wound model.

Authors:  Sandra Lindstedt; Johan Hansson; Joanna Hlebowicz
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2012-04-19       Impact factor: 3.315

2.  Comparative study of the microvascular blood flow in the intestinal wall during conventional negative pressure wound therapy and negative pressure wound therapy using paraffin gauze over the intestines in laparostomy.

Authors:  Sandra Lindstedt; Johan Hansson; Joanna Hlebowicz
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2011-10-11       Impact factor: 3.315

3.  Blood flow response in small intestinal loops at different depths during negative pressure wound therapy of the open abdomen.

Authors:  Sandra Lindstedt; Joanna Hlebowicz
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2012-06-14       Impact factor: 3.315

Review 4.  Total management of the open abdomen.

Authors:  Demetrios Demetriades
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 3.315

5.  Novel method for delayed primary closure and incisional hernia prevention in open abdomen: COmbined and MOdified Definitive Abdominal wall closure (COMODA).

Authors:  R Villalobos Mori; Y Maestre González; Mª Mias Carballal; C Gas Ruiz; G Protti Ruiz; A Escartin Arias; J J Olsina Kissler
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2019-04-09       Impact factor: 4.739

Review 6.  [Peritonitis: attempt to evaluate therapeutic surgical options].

Authors:  W Teichmann; C Pohland; T Mansfeld; B Herbig
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 0.955

7.  Surgical treatment of the open abdomen in patients with abdominal sepsis using the vacuum assisted closure system.

Authors:  Alexander Perathoner; Raimund Margreiter; Reinhold Kafka-Ritsch
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 3.352

8.  Vacuum-assisted closure of postoperative abdominal wounds: a prospective study.

Authors:  Sriram Subramonia; Sarah Pankhurst; Brian J Rowlands; Dileep N Lobo
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 3.352

9.  Treatment of the open abdomen with the commercially available vacuum-assisted closure system in patients with abdominal sepsis: low primary closure rate.

Authors:  D Wondberg; H J Larusson; U Metzger; A Platz; U Zingg
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 3.352

10.  Damage control surgery with abdominal vacuum and delayed bowel reconstruction in patients with perforated diverticulitis Hinchey III/IV.

Authors:  Reinhold Kafka-Ritsch; Franz Birkfellner; Alexander Perathoner; Helmut Raab; Hermann Nehoda; Johann Pratschke; Matthias Zitt
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2012-07-28       Impact factor: 3.452

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.