Literature DB >> 28093615

The Open Abdomen Route by EuraHS: introduction of the data set and initial results of procedures and procedure-related complications.

A Willms1, F Muysoms2, C Güsgen3, R Schwab3, J Lock4, S Schaaf3, C Germer4, I Richardsen3, U Dietz4.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Open abdomen management has become a well-established strategy in the treatment of serious intra-abdominal pathologies. Key objectives are fistula prevention and high fascial closure rates. The current level of evidence on laparostoma is insufficient. This is due to the rareness of laparostomas, the heterogeneity of study cohorts, and broad diversity of techniques. Collecting data in a standardised, multicentre registry is necessary to draw up evidence-based guidelines.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: In order to improve the level of evidence on laparostomy, CAMIN (surgical working group for military and emergency surgery) of DGAV (German Society for General and Visceral Surgery), initiated the implementation of a laparostomy registry. This registry was established as the Open Abdomen Route by EuraHS (European Registry of Abdominal Wall Hernias). Key objectives include collection of data, quality assurance, standardisation of therapeutic concepts and the development of guidelines. Since 1 May 2015, the registry is available as an online database called Open Abdomen Route of EuraHS (European Registry of Abdominal Wall Hernias). It includes 11 categories for data collection, including three scheduled follow-up examinations.
RESULTS: As part of this pilot study, all entries of the first 120 days were analysed, resulting in a review of 82 patients. At 44%, secondary peritonitis was the predominant indication. The mortality rate was 22%. A comparison of methods with and without fascial traction reveals fascial closure rates of 67% and 25%, respectively (intention-to-treat analysis, p < 0.03). Inert visceral protection was used in 67% of patients and achieved a small bowel fistula incidence of only 5.5%. DISCUSSION: Optimising laparostomy management techniques in order to achieve low incidence of fistulation and high fascial closure rates is possible. The method that ensures the best possible outcome-based on current evidence-would involve fascial traction, visceral protection and negative pressure. The laparostomy registry is a useful tool for quickly generating sufficient evidence for open abdomen treatment.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Abdominal compartement syndrome; Abdominal trauma; Laparostoma; Open abdomen; Peritonitis

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28093615     DOI: 10.1007/s10029-017-1572-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hernia        ISSN: 1248-9204            Impact factor:   4.739


  29 in total

1.  One hundred percent fascial approximation can be achieved in the postinjury open abdomen with a sequential closure protocol.

Authors:  Clay Cothren Burlew; Ernest E Moore; Walter L Biffl; Denis D Bensard; Jeffrey L Johnson; Carlton C Barnett
Journal:  J Trauma Acute Care Surg       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 3.313

2.  VAC and fistula formation.

Authors:  T Wild; P Goetzinger; B Telekey
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 3.788

Review 3.  "Acute postoperative open abdominal wall": Nosological concept and treatment implications.

Authors:  Manuel López-Cano; José A Pereira; Manuel Armengol-Carrasco
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2013-12-27

4.  The value of vacuum-assisted closure in septic patients treated with laparostomy.

Authors:  Ioannis Pliakos; Theodossis S Papavramidis; Nick Michalopoulos; Nickolaos Deligiannidis; Isaak Kesisoglou; Konstantinos Sapalidis; Spiros Papavramidis
Journal:  Am Surg       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 0.688

5.  [Prevention of small bowel fistulas during open abdominal treatment: lessons learned].

Authors:  A Willms; C Güsgen; C Schreyer; H-P Becker; R Schwab
Journal:  Zentralbl Chir       Date:  2011-05-11       Impact factor: 0.942

6.  Open abdominal management after damage-control laparotomy for trauma: a prospective observational American Association for the Surgery of Trauma multicenter study.

Authors:  Joseph J Dubose; Thomas M Scalea; John B Holcomb; Binod Shrestha; Obi Okoye; Kenji Inaba; Tiffany K Bee; Timothy C Fabian; James Whelan; Rao R Ivatury
Journal:  J Trauma Acute Care Surg       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 3.313

7.  Surgical strategies for management of the open abdomen.

Authors:  Justin L Regner; Leslie Kobayashi; Raul Coimbra
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 3.352

8.  Incisional hernia rate after open abdomen treatment with negative pressure and delayed primary fascia closure.

Authors:  A Brandl; E Laimer; A Perathoner; M Zitt; J Pratschke; R Kafka-Ritsch
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2013-03-02       Impact factor: 4.739

Review 9.  Systematic review and evidence based recommendations for the use of negative pressure wound therapy in the open abdomen.

Authors:  A Bruhin; F Ferreira; M Chariker; J Smith; N Runkel
Journal:  Int J Surg       Date:  2014-08-28       Impact factor: 6.071

10.  Early repair of open abdomen with a tailored two-component mesh and conditioning vacuum packing: a safe alternative to the planned giant ventral hernia.

Authors:  U A Dietz; C Wichelmann; C Wunder; J Kauczok; L Spor; A Strauß; R Wildenauer; C Jurowich; C T Germer
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2012-05-23       Impact factor: 4.739

View more
  7 in total

Review 1.  EHS clinical guidelines on the management of the abdominal wall in the context of the open or burst abdomen.

Authors:  M López-Cano; J M García-Alamino; S A Antoniou; D Bennet; U A Dietz; F Ferreira; R H Fortelny; P Hernandez-Granados; M Miserez; A Montgomery; S Morales-Conde; F Muysoms; J A Pereira; R Schwab; N Slater; A Vanlander; G H Van Ramshorst; F Berrevoet
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2018-09-03       Impact factor: 4.739

2.  Intensive care and health outcomes of open abdominal treatment: long-term results of vacuum-assisted wound closure and mesh-mediated fascial traction (VAWCM).

Authors:  A Willms; S Schaaf; R Schwab; I Richardsen; C Jänig; D Bieler; B Wagner; C Güsgen
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2017-04-05       Impact factor: 3.445

Review 3.  Successful treatment of enteroatmospheric fistulas in combination with negative pressure wound therapy: Experience on 3 cases and literature review.

Authors:  Ulrich Wirth; Bernhard W Renz; Dorian Andrade; Tobias S Schiergens; Helmut Arbogast; Joachim Andrassy; Jens Werner
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2018-03-30       Impact factor: 3.315

4.  Mesh-augmented versus direct abdominal closure in patients undergoing open abdomen treatment.

Authors:  M O Jakob; C Schwarz; T Haltmeier; J Zindel; T Pinworasarn; D Candinas; P Starlinger; G Beldi
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2018-07-19       Impact factor: 4.739

5.  Long Term Outcome After Open Abdomen Treatment: Function and Quality of Life.

Authors:  Alexis Theodorou; Agnes Jedig; Steffen Manekeller; Arnulf Willms; Dimitrios Pantelis; Hanno Matthaei; Nico Schäfer; Jörg C Kalff; Martin W von Websky
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2021-03-29

6.  Early Initiation of a Standardized Open Abdomen Treatment With Vacuum Assisted Mesh-Mediated Fascial Traction Achieves Best Results.

Authors:  Frederik Berrevoet; Silvio Lampaert; Kashika Singh; Kamilya Jakipbayeva; Stijn van Cleven; Aude Vanlander
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2021-02-09

7.  Factors influencing the fascial closure rate after open abdomen treatment: Results from the European Hernia Society (EuraHS) Registry : Surgical technique matters.

Authors:  A G Willms; R Schwab; M W von Websky; F Berrevoet; D Tartaglia; K Sörelius; R H Fortelny; M Björck; T Monchal; F Brennfleck; D Bulian; C Beltzer; C T Germer; J F Lock
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2020-11-21       Impact factor: 2.920

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.