Literature DB >> 27601035

Abdominal wall integrity after open abdomen: long-term results of vacuum-assisted wound closure and mesh-mediated fascial traction (VAWCM).

A Willms1, S Schaaf2, R Schwab2, I Richardsen2, D Bieler3, B Wagner4, C Güsgen2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The open abdomen has become a standard technique in the management of critically ill patients undergoing surgery for severe intra-abdominal conditions. Negative pressure and mesh-mediated fascial traction are commonly used and achieve low fistula rates and high fascial closure rates. In this study, long-term results of a standardised treatment approach are presented.
METHODS: Fifty-five patients who underwent OA management for different indications at our institution from 2006 to 2013 were enrolled. All patients were treated under a standardised algorithm that uses a combination of vacuum-assisted wound closure and mesh-mediated fascial traction. Structured follow-up assessments were offered to patients and included a medical history, a clinical examination and abdominal ultrasonography. The data obtained were statistically analysed.
RESULTS: The fascial closure rate was 74 % in an intention-to-treat analysis and 89 % in a per-protocol analysis. The fistula rate was 1.8 %. Thirty-four patients attended follow-up. The median follow-up was 46 months (range 12-88 months). Incisional hernias developed in 35 %. Patients with hernias needed more operative procedures (10.3 vs 3.4, p = 0.03) than patients without hernia formation. A Patient Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS) of 31.1 was calculated. Patients with symptomatic hernias (NAS of 2-10) had a significantly lower mean POSAS score (p = 0.04).
CONCLUSIONS: Vacuum-assisted wound closure and mesh-mediated fascial traction (VAWCM) seem to result in low complication rates and high fascial closure rates. Abdominal wall reconstruction, which is a challenging and complex procedure and causes considerable patient discomfort, can thus be avoided in the majority of cases. Available results are based on studies involving only a small number of cases. Multi-centre studies and registry-based data are therefore needed to validate these findings.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Incisional hernia; Negative pressure therapy; Open abdomen; Outcome; Peritonitis; Primary delayed fascial closure

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27601035     DOI: 10.1007/s10029-016-1534-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hernia        ISSN: 1248-9204            Impact factor:   4.739


  24 in total

1.  "Components separation" method for closure of abdominal-wall defects: an anatomic and clinical study.

Authors:  O M Ramirez; E Ruas; A L Dellon
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  1990-09       Impact factor: 4.730

2.  [Prevention of small bowel fistulas during open abdominal treatment: lessons learned].

Authors:  A Willms; C Güsgen; C Schreyer; H-P Becker; R Schwab
Journal:  Zentralbl Chir       Date:  2011-05-11       Impact factor: 0.942

3.  What score on the Vancouver Scar Scale constitutes a hypertrophic scar? Results from a survey of North American burn-care providers.

Authors:  Callie M Thompson; Ravi F Sood; Shari Honari; Gretchen J Carrougher; Nicole S Gibran
Journal:  Burns       Date:  2015-07-02       Impact factor: 2.744

4.  Open abdominal management after damage-control laparotomy for trauma: a prospective observational American Association for the Surgery of Trauma multicenter study.

Authors:  Joseph J Dubose; Thomas M Scalea; John B Holcomb; Binod Shrestha; Obi Okoye; Kenji Inaba; Tiffany K Bee; Timothy C Fabian; James Whelan; Rao R Ivatury
Journal:  J Trauma Acute Care Surg       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 3.313

Review 5.  Systematic review and meta-analysis of the open abdomen and temporary abdominal closure techniques in non-trauma patients.

Authors:  J J Atema; S L Gans; M A Boermeester
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 3.352

6.  Incisional hernia rate after open abdomen treatment with negative pressure and delayed primary fascia closure.

Authors:  A Brandl; E Laimer; A Perathoner; M Zitt; J Pratschke; R Kafka-Ritsch
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2013-03-02       Impact factor: 4.739

7.  Damage control surgery with abdominal vacuum and delayed bowel reconstruction in patients with perforated diverticulitis Hinchey III/IV.

Authors:  Reinhold Kafka-Ritsch; Franz Birkfellner; Alexander Perathoner; Helmut Raab; Hermann Nehoda; Johann Pratschke; Matthias Zitt
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2012-07-28       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 8.  Systematic review and evidence based recommendations for the use of negative pressure wound therapy in the open abdomen.

Authors:  A Bruhin; F Ferreira; M Chariker; J Smith; N Runkel
Journal:  Int J Surg       Date:  2014-08-28       Impact factor: 6.071

9.  Prophylactic prosthetic reinforcement of midline abdominal incisions in high-risk patients.

Authors:  O H El-Khadrawy; G Moussa; O Mansour; M S Hashish
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2009-03-05       Impact factor: 4.739

10.  Early repair of open abdomen with a tailored two-component mesh and conditioning vacuum packing: a safe alternative to the planned giant ventral hernia.

Authors:  U A Dietz; C Wichelmann; C Wunder; J Kauczok; L Spor; A Strauß; R Wildenauer; C Jurowich; C T Germer
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2012-05-23       Impact factor: 4.739

View more
  7 in total

1.  Intensive care and health outcomes of open abdominal treatment: long-term results of vacuum-assisted wound closure and mesh-mediated fascial traction (VAWCM).

Authors:  A Willms; S Schaaf; R Schwab; I Richardsen; C Jänig; D Bieler; B Wagner; C Güsgen
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2017-04-05       Impact factor: 3.445

2.  Blurring the boundary between open abdomen treatment and ventral hernia repair.

Authors:  Samuel A Käser; P Brosi; P A Clavien; R Vonlanthen
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2019-02-07       Impact factor: 3.445

3.  Mesh-augmented versus direct abdominal closure in patients undergoing open abdomen treatment.

Authors:  M O Jakob; C Schwarz; T Haltmeier; J Zindel; T Pinworasarn; D Candinas; P Starlinger; G Beldi
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2018-07-19       Impact factor: 4.739

4.  Prophylactic Onlay Mesh Implantation During Definitive Fascial Closure After Open Abdomen Therapy (PROMOAT): Absorbable or Non-absorbable? Methodical Description and Results of a Feasibility Study.

Authors:  Sebastian Schaaf; Robert Schwab; Christoph Güsgen; Arnulf Willms
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2020-12-15

5.  Early Initiation of a Standardized Open Abdomen Treatment With Vacuum Assisted Mesh-Mediated Fascial Traction Achieves Best Results.

Authors:  Frederik Berrevoet; Silvio Lampaert; Kashika Singh; Kamilya Jakipbayeva; Stijn van Cleven; Aude Vanlander
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2021-02-09

6.  Factors influencing the fascial closure rate after open abdomen treatment: Results from the European Hernia Society (EuraHS) Registry : Surgical technique matters.

Authors:  A G Willms; R Schwab; M W von Websky; F Berrevoet; D Tartaglia; K Sörelius; R H Fortelny; M Björck; T Monchal; F Brennfleck; D Bulian; C Beltzer; C T Germer; J F Lock
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2020-11-21       Impact factor: 2.920

7.  Successful abdominal wound closure for treatment of severe peritonitis using negative pressure wound therapy with continuous mesh fascial traction: a case report.

Authors:  Hideki Kogo; Jun Hagiwara; Shiei Kin; Eiji Uchida
Journal:  Surg Case Rep       Date:  2018-05-09
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.