M López-Cano1, J M García-Alamino2, S A Antoniou3, D Bennet4, U A Dietz5, F Ferreira6,7, R H Fortelny8,9, P Hernandez-Granados10, M Miserez11, A Montgomery12, S Morales-Conde13, F Muysoms14, J A Pereira15, R Schwab16, N Slater17, A Vanlander18, G H Van Ramshorst19, F Berrevoet18. 1. Abdominal Wall Surgery Unit, Department of General Surgery, Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Passeig Vall d'Hebron 119-129, 08035, Barcelona, Spain. mlpezcano@gmail.com. 2. DPhil Programme in Evidence-Based Healthcare, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK. 3. Department of Colorectal Surgery, Royal Devon and Exeter NHS Foundation Trust, Exeter, UK. 4. Royal Bournemouth and Christchurch Hospital, Castle Lane East, Bournemouth, BH7 7DW, UK. 5. Department of General and Visceral Surgery, Cantonal Hospital of Olten,, Olten, Switzerland. 6. Department of Surgery: Upper Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Wall Surgery, Pedro Hispano Hospital, Matosinhos, Porto, Portugal. 7. Department of General Surgery, CUF, Porto Hospital, Porto, Portugal. 8. Department of General, Visceral and Oncological Surgery, Wilhelminenspital, Vienna, Austria. 9. Medical Faculty of Sigmund Freud University Vienna, Vienna, Austria. 10. Unidad de Cirugía General, Hospital Universitario Fundación Alcorcón, Alcorcón, Madrid, Spain. 11. Department of Abdominal Surgery, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium. 12. Department of Surgery, Malmö University Hospital, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden. 13. Unit of Innovation in Minimally Invasive Surgery, General and Digestive Surgery Unit, University Hospital Virgen del Rocío, Seville, Spain. 14. Department of Surgery, Maria Middelares Hospital, Ghent, Belgium. 15. Servei de Cirurgia General, Hospital del Mar, Parc de Salut Mar, Departament de Ciències Experimentals i de la Salut, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, Spain. 16. General and Thoracic Surgery, Federal Armed Forces Central Hospital, Koblenz, Germany. 17. Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. 18. Department of General and HPB Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Ghent University Hospita, Ghent, Belgium. 19. The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To provide guidelines for all surgical specialists who deal with the open abdomen (OA) or the burst abdomen (BA) in adult patients both on the methods used to close the musculofascial layers of the abdominal wall, and regarding possible materials to be used. METHODS: The guidelines were developed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach including publications up to January 2017. When RCTs were available, outcomes of interest were quantitatively synthesized by means of a conventional meta-analysis. When only observational studies were available, a meta-analysis of proportions was done. The guidelines were written using the AGREE II instrument. RESULTS: For many of the Key Questions that were researched, there were no high quality studies available. While some strong recommendations could be made according to GRADE, the guidelines also contain good practice statements and clinical expertise guidance which are distinct from recommendations that have been formally categorized using GRADE. RECOMMENDATIONS: When considering the OA, dynamic closure techniques should be prioritized over the use of static closure techniques (strong recommendation). However, for techniques including suture closure, mesh reinforcement, component separation techniques and skin grafting, only clinical expertise guidance was provided. Considering the BA, a clinical expertise guidance statement was advised for dynamic closure techniques. Additionally, a clinical expertise guidance statement concerning suture closure and a good practice statement concerning mesh reinforcement during fascial closure were proposed. The role of advanced techniques such as component separation or relaxing incisions is questioned. In addition, the role of the abdominal girdle seems limited to very selected patients.
PURPOSE: To provide guidelines for all surgical specialists who deal with the open abdomen (OA) or the burst abdomen (BA) in adult patients both on the methods used to close the musculofascial layers of the abdominal wall, and regarding possible materials to be used. METHODS: The guidelines were developed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach including publications up to January 2017. When RCTs were available, outcomes of interest were quantitatively synthesized by means of a conventional meta-analysis. When only observational studies were available, a meta-analysis of proportions was done. The guidelines were written using the AGREE II instrument. RESULTS: For many of the Key Questions that were researched, there were no high quality studies available. While some strong recommendations could be made according to GRADE, the guidelines also contain good practice statements and clinical expertise guidance which are distinct from recommendations that have been formally categorized using GRADE. RECOMMENDATIONS: When considering the OA, dynamic closure techniques should be prioritized over the use of static closure techniques (strong recommendation). However, for techniques including suture closure, mesh reinforcement, component separation techniques and skin grafting, only clinical expertise guidance was provided. Considering the BA, a clinical expertise guidance statement was advised for dynamic closure techniques. Additionally, a clinical expertise guidance statement concerning suture closure and a good practice statement concerning mesh reinforcement during fascial closure were proposed. The role of advanced techniques such as component separation or relaxing incisions is questioned. In addition, the role of the abdominal girdle seems limited to very selected patients.
Authors: Melissa C Brouwers; Michelle E Kho; George P Browman; Jako S Burgers; Francoise Cluzeau; Gene Feder; Béatrice Fervers; Ian D Graham; Jeremy Grimshaw; Steven E Hanna; Peter Littlejohns; Julie Makarski; Louise Zitzelsberger Journal: CMAJ Date: 2010-07-05 Impact factor: 8.262
Authors: Krzysztof Szmyt; Krokowicz Łukasz; Adam Bobkiewicz; Bartosz Cybułka; Witold Ledwosiński; Maciej Gordon; Ahmed Alammari; Tomasz Banasiewicz; Michał Drews Journal: Pol Przegl Chir Date: 2015-03-01
Authors: Gabrielle H van Ramshorst; Hasan H Eker; Jan A van der Voet; Johannes Jeekel; Johan F Lange Journal: J Gastrointest Surg Date: 2013-05-29 Impact factor: 3.452
Authors: Daniel Perez; Stefan Wildi; Nicolas Demartines; Matthias Bramkamp; Christian Koehler; Pierre-Alain Clavien Journal: J Am Coll Surg Date: 2007-10 Impact factor: 6.113
Authors: Arnulf Willms; Christoph Güsgen; Robert Schwab; Rolf Lefering; Sebastian Schaaf; Johan Lock; Erwin Kollig; Christoph Jänig; Dan Bieler Journal: Langenbecks Arch Surg Date: 2021-10-05 Impact factor: 3.445
Authors: S Valverde; M A Arbós; M T Quiles; E Espín; J L Sánchez-Garcia; V Rodrigues; J A Pereira; R Villalobos; J M García-Alamino; M Armengol; M López-Cano Journal: Hernia Date: 2021-05-31 Impact factor: 2.920
Authors: Andrew S Miller; Kathryn Boyce; Benjamin Box; Matthew D Clarke; Sarah E Duff; Niamh M Foley; Richard J Guy; Lisa H Massey; George Ramsay; Dominic A J Slade; James A Stephenson; Phil J Tozer; Danette Wright Journal: Colorectal Dis Date: 2021-02 Impact factor: 3.917
Authors: A G Willms; R Schwab; M W von Websky; F Berrevoet; D Tartaglia; K Sörelius; R H Fortelny; M Björck; T Monchal; F Brennfleck; D Bulian; C Beltzer; C T Germer; J F Lock Journal: Hernia Date: 2020-11-21 Impact factor: 2.920
Authors: George A Antoniou; Dimitris Mavridis; Sofia Tsokani; Manuel López-Cano; Iván D Flórez; Melissa Brouwers; Sheraz R Markar; Gianfranco Silecchia; Nader K Francis; Stavros A Antoniou Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2020-08-11 Impact factor: 2.692