Literature DB >> 25124054

Correlation between optical coherence tomography-derived intraluminal parameters and fractional flow reserve measurements in intermediate grade coronary lesions: a comparison between diabetic and non-diabetic patients.

Sebastian Reith1, Simone Battermann, Martin Hellmich, Nikolaus Marx, Mathias Burgmaier.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Fractional flow reserve (FFR) measurements accurately assess functional relevance in intermediate grade coronary lesions. A significant relationship between hemodynamic stenosis severity and optical coherence tomography (OCT)-derived intraluminal dimensions has recently been demonstrated. However, morphologic thresholds to identify significant stenoses are variable and exploration of this correlation in patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) remains currently incomplete. This study aimed at comparing the diagnostic value of intraluminal parameters as determined by OCT to predict FFR ≤0.8 in lesions of patients with versus without DM.
METHODS: In 100 patients (DM = 56, non-DM = 44) with 142 coronary de novo lesions (DM = 80, non-DM = 62) of intermediate grade as determined by quantitative coronary angiography, we performed OCT and FFR. Stenoses were defined functionally relevant if FFR was ≤0.8.
RESULTS: FFR measurements in the overall study cohort, the DM and the non-DM group correlated significantly with minimal lumen area (MLA) [overall: r (2) = 0.339, DM: r (2) = 0.341, non-DM: r (2) = 0.355 (all p < 0.001)], percent area stenosis [overall: r (2) = 0.352, DM: r (2) = 0.376, non-DM: r (2) = 0.351 (all p < 0.001)] and minimal lumen diameter [overall: r (2) = 0.333, DM: r (2) = 0.277, non-DM: r (2) = 0.417 (all p < 0.001)] without differing statistically between diabetic and non-diabetic patients (p = ns). Receiver operating characteristic analysis demonstrated that among OCT-derived parameters, MLA predicted FFR ≤0.8 with the best diagnostic efficiency and with similar cut-off values for all patients [area under the curve (AUC) = 0.836, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.772-0.901, cut-off value = 1.64 mm(2)] as well as for diabetic (AUC = 0.840, 95% CI = 0.754-0.927, cut-off value = 1.59 mm(2)) and non-diabetic subjects (AUC = 0.833, 95% CI = 0.734-0.932, cut-off value = 1.64 mm(2)).
CONCLUSION: In both, diabetic and non-diabetic patients, FFR and OCT-derived intraluminal measurements are significantly correlated and OCT predicts hemodynamically relevant coronary stenosis with moderate diagnostic efficiency.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25124054     DOI: 10.1007/s00392-014-0759-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol        ISSN: 1861-0684            Impact factor:   5.460


  35 in total

1.  Fractional flow reserve in patients with prior myocardial infarction.

Authors:  B De Bruyne; N H Pijls; J Bartunek; K Kulecki; J W Bech; H De Winter; P Van Crombrugge; G R Heyndrickx; W Wijns
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2001-07-10       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 2.  Assessment of intermediate severity coronary lesions in the catheterization laboratory.

Authors:  Jonathan Tobis; Babak Azarbal; Leo Slavin
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2007-02-09       Impact factor: 24.094

3.  Assessment of short-, medium-, and long-term variations in arterial dimensions from computer-assisted quantitation of coronary cineangiograms.

Authors:  J H Reiber; P W Serruys; C J Kooijman; W Wijns; C J Slager; J J Gerbrands; J C Schuurbiers; A den Boer; P G Hugenholtz
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1985-02       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 4.  Measuring the accuracy of diagnostic systems.

Authors:  J A Swets
Journal:  Science       Date:  1988-06-03       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Role of chronic hyperglycemia in the pathogenesis of coronary microvascular dysfunction in diabetes.

Authors:  Marcelo F Di Carli; James Janisse; George Grunberger; Joel Ager
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2003-04-16       Impact factor: 24.094

6.  Maximal hyperemia in the assessment of fractional flow reserve: intracoronary adenosine versus intracoronary sodium nitroprusside versus intravenous adenosine: the NASCI (Nitroprussiato versus Adenosina nelle Stenosi Coronariche Intermedie) study.

Authors:  Antonio Maria Leone; Italo Porto; Alberto Ranieri De Caterina; Eloisa Basile; Andrea Aurelio; Andrea Gardi; Dolores Russo; Domenico Laezza; Giampaolo Niccoli; Francesco Burzotta; Carlo Trani; Mario Attilio Mazzari; Rocco Mongiardo; Antonio Giuseppe Rebuzzi; Filippo Crea
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 11.195

7.  Role of incremental doses of intracoronary adenosine for fractional flow reserve assessment.

Authors:  Blaithnead Murtagh; Stuart Higano; Ryan Lennon; Verghese Mathew; David R Holmes; Amir Lerman
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 4.749

8.  Evaluation of hemodynamically severe coronary stenosis as determined by fractional flow reserve with frequency domain optical coherence tomography measured anatomical parameters.

Authors:  Haroon Zafar; Ihsan Ullah; Kate Dinneen; Sajjad Matiullah; Alan Hanley; Martin J Leahy; Faisal Sharif
Journal:  J Cardiol       Date:  2013-12-22       Impact factor: 3.159

9.  Maximal coronary flow reserve and metabolic coronary vasodilation in patients with diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  P J Nahser; R E Brown; H Oskarsson; M D Winniford; J D Rossen
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1995-02-01       Impact factor: 29.690

10.  Impact of type 2 diabetes mellitus and glucose control on fractional flow reserve measurements in intermediate grade coronary lesions.

Authors:  Sebastian Reith; Simone Battermann; Martin Hellmich; Nikolaus Marx; Mathias Burgmaier
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2013-11-22       Impact factor: 5.460

View more
  10 in total

1.  Predictors for target lesion microcalcifications in patients with stable coronary artery disease: an optical coherence tomography study.

Authors:  Sebastian Reith; Andrea Milzi; Rosalia Dettori; Nikolaus Marx; Mathias Burgmaier
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2018-04-13       Impact factor: 5.460

Review 2.  A systematic review of imaging anatomy in predicting functional significance of coronary stenoses determined by fractional flow reserve.

Authors:  Miao Chu; Neng Dai; Junqing Yang; Jelmer Westra; Shengxian Tu
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2017-03-06       Impact factor: 2.357

Review 3.  The Continuum of Invasive Techniques for the Assessment of Intermediate Coronary Lesions.

Authors:  Nicoleta-Monica Popa-Fotea; Alexandru Scafa-Udriste; Maria Dorobantu
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-18

Review 4.  Critical analysis of the correlation between optical coherence tomography versus intravascular ultrasound and fractional flow reserve in the management of intermediate coronary artery lesion.

Authors:  Yan-Feng Ma; Jiang-Ming Fam; Bu-Chun Zhang
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-05-15

Review 5.  Optical Coherence Tomography of the Coronary Arteries.

Authors:  Robert Roland; Josef Veselka
Journal:  Int J Angiol       Date:  2021-02-12

6.  Morphometric Assessment for Functional Evaluation of Coronary Stenosis with Optical Coherence Tomography and the Optical Flow Ratio in a Vessel with Single Stenosis.

Authors:  Yuming Huang; Zehuo Lin; Quanmin Wu; Liansheng Chen; Junqing Yang; Huiliang Deng; Yuanhui Liu; Nianjin Xie
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-09-02       Impact factor: 4.964

7.  OCT-Derived Plaque Morphology and FFR-Determined Hemodynamic Relevance in Intermediate Coronary Stenoses.

Authors:  Mariusz Tomaniak; Dorota Ochijewicz; Łukasz Kołtowski; Adam Rdzanek; Arkadiusz Pietrasik; Jacek Jąkała; Magdalena Slezak; Krzysztof P Malinowski; Martyna Zaleska; Jakub Maksym; Piotr Barus; Tomasz Roleder; Krzysztof J Filipiak; Grzegorz Opolski; Janusz Kochman
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-05-28       Impact factor: 4.241

8.  Clinical Outcomes of Deferred Lesions With Angiographically Insignificant Stenosis But Low Fractional Flow Reserve.

Authors:  Joo Myung Lee; Bon-Kwon Koo; Eun-Seok Shin; Chang-Wook Nam; Joon-Hyung Doh; Xinyang Hu; Fei Ye; Shaoliang Chen; Junqing Yang; Jiyan Chen; Nobuhiro Tanaka; Hiroyoshi Yokoi; Hitoshi Matsuo; Hiroaki Takashima; Yasutsugu Shiono; Doyeon Hwang; Jonghanne Park; Kyung-Jin Kim; Takashi Akasaka; Jianan Wang
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2017-08-22       Impact factor: 5.501

9.  Non-culprit plaque characteristics in acute coronary syndrome patients with raised hemoglobinA1c: an intravascular optical coherence tomography study.

Authors:  Shaotao Zhang; Jiannan Dai; Haibo Jia; Sining Hu; Hongwei Du; Ning Li; Yongpeng Zou; Yanan Zou; Shenhong Jing; Yan Wang; Rong Sun; Bo Yu
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diabetol       Date:  2018-06-15       Impact factor: 9.951

10.  Relationships of coronary culprit-plaque characteristics with duration of diabetes mellitus in acute myocardial infarction: an intravascular optical coherence tomography study.

Authors:  Zhaoxue Sheng; Peng Zhou; Chen Liu; Jiannan Li; Runzhen Chen; Jinying Zhou; Li Song; Hanjun Zhao; Hongbing Yan
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diabetol       Date:  2019-10-19       Impact factor: 9.951

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.