Literature DB >> 12851614

Role of incremental doses of intracoronary adenosine for fractional flow reserve assessment.

Blaithnead Murtagh1, Stuart Higano, Ryan Lennon, Verghese Mathew, David R Holmes, Amir Lerman.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The achievement of maximal vasodilatation of the coronary microvessels is mandatory for the accurate determination of fractional flow reserve (FFR); the optimal dosing to achieve maximal vasodilation is unclear. This study was designed to address the hypothesis that incremental doses of intracoronary adenosine are necessary to ensure complete vasodilatation of the coronary microcirculation and accurate assessment of FFR. We also examined the relationship between FFR and coronary artery disease risk factors.
METHODS: A total of 191 patients (215 vessels) with intermediate coronary lesions were examined. FFR was measured during cardiac catheterization with a pressure monitoring wire. Incremental doses of intracoronary adenosine (12-42 microg, left coronary artery; 12-48 microg, right coronary artery) were administered.
RESULTS: Diabetes mellitus was present in 23% of patients, hypertension was present in 65% of patients, and prior myocardial infarction had occurred in 25% of patients. The average percent stenosis in vessels was 57% +/- 15%. Vessels were subdivided on the basis of initial FFR (group 1, <0.75; group II, 0.75-0.79; group III, 0.80-0.89; group IV, >or=0.9). Five of the 24 (21%) vessels with an initial FFR in the 0.75 to 0.80 range had a subsequent FFR of <0.75. There was no difference in FFR or doses of adenosine in the patients with coronary artery disease risk factors. The average adenosine dose given at the achievement of minimal FFR was 26 microg in the right coronary artery (RCA) and 34 microg in the left coronary artery (LCA). The average maximum dose of intracoronary adenosine administered was 29 microg for the RCA and 37 microg for the LCA. The maximum dose of adenosine ever required to achieve minimum FFR was 42 microg in both the LCA and RCA.
CONCLUSION: This study suggests that a single high dose of 42 microg of intracoronary adenosine for both the RCA and LCA is sufficient to achieve maximum hyperemia and accurate FFR in most patients, independent of risk factors. Alternatively, when a lower initial dose is administered and FFR is in the 0.75 to 0.90 range, incremental doses of adenosine should be administered to ensure maximal hyperemia.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12851614     DOI: 10.1016/S0002-8703(03)00120-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Heart J        ISSN: 0002-8703            Impact factor:   4.749


  12 in total

Review 1.  Diagnosis of coronary microvascular dysfunction - Present status.

Authors:  S R Mittal
Journal:  Indian Heart J       Date:  2015-11-06

2.  Comparison of Tc-99m sestamibi SPECT with fractional flow reserve in patients with intermediate coronary artery stenoses.

Authors:  Marcus Hacker; Johannes Rieber; Rupert Schmid; Christian Lafougere; Andreas Tausig; Karl Theisen; Volker Klaus; Reinhold Tiling
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2005 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 3.  Intravascular imaging tools in the cardiac catheterization laboratory: comprehensive assessment of anatomy and physiology.

Authors:  Parham Eshtehardi; Jennifer Luke; Michael C McDaniel; Habib Samady
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Transl Res       Date:  2011-04-01       Impact factor: 4.132

4.  Correlation between optical coherence tomography-derived intraluminal parameters and fractional flow reserve measurements in intermediate grade coronary lesions: a comparison between diabetic and non-diabetic patients.

Authors:  Sebastian Reith; Simone Battermann; Martin Hellmich; Nikolaus Marx; Mathias Burgmaier
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2014-08-15       Impact factor: 5.460

5.  Comparison of standard- and high-dose intracoronary adenosine for the measurement of coronary fractional flow reserve (FFR).

Authors:  Jens Röther; Stephan Achenbach; Monique Tröbs; Florian Blachutzik; Holger Nef; Mohamed Marwan; Christian Schlundt
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2016-06-15       Impact factor: 5.460

6.  Performing and Interpreting Fractional Flow Reserve Measurements in Clinical Practice: An Expert Consensus Document.

Authors:  Stephan Achenbach; Tanja Rudolph; Johannes Rieber; Holger Eggebrecht; Gert Richardt; Thomas Schmitz; Nikos Werner; Florian Boenner; Helge Möllmann
Journal:  Interv Cardiol       Date:  2017-09

Review 7.  [Microcirculation of intensive care patients. From the physiology to the bedside].

Authors:  H Knotzer; W Hasibeder
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 1.041

8.  Long-term outcomes of fractional flow reserve-guided vs. angiography-guided percutaneous coronary intervention in contemporary practice.

Authors:  Jing Li; Muhamad Y Elrashidi; Andreas J Flammer; Ryan J Lennon; Malcolm R Bell; David R Holmes; John F Bresnahan; Charanjit S Rihal; Lilach O Lerman; Amir Lerman
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2013-01-23       Impact factor: 29.983

9.  Impact of type 2 diabetes mellitus and glucose control on fractional flow reserve measurements in intermediate grade coronary lesions.

Authors:  Sebastian Reith; Simone Battermann; Martin Hellmich; Nikolaus Marx; Mathias Burgmaier
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2013-11-22       Impact factor: 5.460

10.  Intracoronary versus intravenous adenosine-induced maximal coronary hyperemia for fractional flow reserve measurements.

Authors:  Ahmed Khashaba; Ayman Mortada; Azza Omran
Journal:  Clin Med Insights Cardiol       Date:  2014-02-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.