Literature DB >> 24264473

Impact of type 2 diabetes mellitus and glucose control on fractional flow reserve measurements in intermediate grade coronary lesions.

Sebastian Reith1, Simone Battermann, Martin Hellmich, Nikolaus Marx, Mathias Burgmaier.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Hemodynamic relevance of intermediate grade coronary stenoses is accurately assessed by fractional flow reserve (FFR) measurements. However, the reliability of FFR in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) and inadequate glucose control (IGC) is incompletely explored. This study aimed to investigate the impact of DM and IGC on the relationship between FFR measurements and quantitative coronary angiography (QCA)-derived morphological parameters.
METHODS: We performed FFR and QCA in 266 intermediate grade lesions of 224 patients (113 non-DM and 111 DM) with stable coronary artery disease. Diabetic patients were categorized into groups with adequate (HbA1C <7%) and inadequate (HbA1c ≥7%) glucose control.
RESULTS: Intermediate grade lesions from all-DM versus non-DM patients differed significantly in lesion length (LL) (10.91 ± 5.79 mm versus 9.23 ± 3.85 mm, p = 0.005) and hemodynamic relevance (FFR ≤0.8, 37.7% versus 24.2%, p = 0.018). FFR measurements in non-DM, all-DM and DM-IGC patients correlated significantly with percent diameter stenosis (%DS) [non-DM: r2 = 0.075 (p = 0.007); all-DM: r2 = 0.254 (p < 0.001), DM-IGC: r2 = 0.301 (p < 0.001)] and LL [non-DM: r2 = 0.356; all-DM: r2 = 0.580, DM-IGC: r2 = 0.513 (all p < 0.001)]. There was a better correlation between FFR and both %DS (p = 0.022) and LL (p = 0.011) among all-DM compared to non-DM patients. Receiver-operating curve analysis demonstrated that among all QCA-derived parameters LL had the best diagnostic efficacy to predict FFR ≤0.8 for non-DM (AUC 0.911, 95% CI 0.861-0.960, best cut-off value 9.22 mm), all-DM (AUC 0.967, 95% CI 0.942-0.991, best cut-off value 9.97 mm) and DM-IGC (AUC 0.960, 95% CI 0.920-0.999, best cut-off value 9.97 mm) patients.
CONCLUSION: Our data in intermediate grade lesions suggest that FFR is reliable in DM patients and LL is the best predictor for hemodynamic relevance in patients without and with diabetes, irrespective of the glycemic state.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24264473     DOI: 10.1007/s00392-013-0633-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol        ISSN: 1861-0684            Impact factor:   5.460


  43 in total

1.  Are high doses of intracoronary adenosine an alternative to standard intravenous adenosine for the assessment of fractional flow reserve?

Authors:  Gianni Casella; Marcus Leibig; Thomas M Schiele; Reiner Schrepf; Victoria Seelig; Hans-Ulrich Stempfle; Petra Erdin; Johannes Rieber; Andreas König; Uwe Siebert; Volker Klauss
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 4.749

2.  Fractional flow reserve in patients with prior myocardial infarction.

Authors:  B De Bruyne; N H Pijls; J Bartunek; K Kulecki; J W Bech; H De Winter; P Van Crombrugge; G R Heyndrickx; W Wijns
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2001-07-10       Impact factor: 29.690

3.  ESC Guidelines on diabetes, pre-diabetes, and cardiovascular diseases developed in collaboration with the EASD: the Task Force on diabetes, pre-diabetes, and cardiovascular diseases of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and developed in collaboration with the European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD).

Authors:  Lars Rydén; Peter J Grant; Stefan D Anker; Christian Berne; Francesco Cosentino; Nicolas Danchin; Christi Deaton; Javier Escaned; Hans-Peter Hammes; Heikki Huikuri; Michel Marre; Nikolaus Marx; Linda Mellbin; Jan Ostergren; Carlo Patrono; Petar Seferovic; Miguel Sousa Uva; Marja-Riita Taskinen; Michal Tendera; Jaakko Tuomilehto; Paul Valensi; Jose Luis Zamorano; Jose Luis Zamorano; Stephan Achenbach; Helmut Baumgartner; Jeroen J Bax; Héctor Bueno; Veronica Dean; Christi Deaton; Cetin Erol; Robert Fagard; Roberto Ferrari; David Hasdai; Arno W Hoes; Paulus Kirchhof; Juhani Knuuti; Philippe Kolh; Patrizio Lancellotti; Ales Linhart; Petros Nihoyannopoulos; Massimo F Piepoli; Piotr Ponikowski; Per Anton Sirnes; Juan Luis Tamargo; Michal Tendera; Adam Torbicki; William Wijns; Stephan Windecker; Guy De Backer; Per Anton Sirnes; Eduardo Alegria Ezquerra; Angelo Avogaro; Lina Badimon; Elena Baranova; Helmut Baumgartner; John Betteridge; Antonio Ceriello; Robert Fagard; Christian Funck-Brentano; Dietrich C Gulba; David Hasdai; Arno W Hoes; John K Kjekshus; Juhani Knuuti; Philippe Kolh; Eli Lev; Christian Mueller; Ludwig Neyses; Peter M Nilsson; Joep Perk; Piotr Ponikowski; Zeljko Reiner; Naveed Sattar; Volker Schächinger; André Scheen; Henrik Schirmer; Anna Strömberg; Svetlana Sudzhaeva; Juan Luis Tamargo; Margus Viigimaa; Charalambos Vlachopoulos; Robert G Xuereb
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2013-08-30       Impact factor: 29.983

Review 4.  Assessment of intermediate severity coronary lesions in the catheterization laboratory.

Authors:  Jonathan Tobis; Babak Azarbal; Leo Slavin
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2007-02-09       Impact factor: 24.094

5.  Impact of hyperglycemia at admission in patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction as assessed by contrast-enhanced MRI.

Authors:  Christoph J Jensen; Holger C Eberle; Kai Nassenstein; Thomas Schlosser; Mani Farazandeh; Christoph K Naber; Georg V Sabin; Oliver Bruder
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2011-02-24       Impact factor: 5.460

Review 6.  Measuring the accuracy of diagnostic systems.

Authors:  J A Swets
Journal:  Science       Date:  1988-06-03       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Fractional flow reserve in unstable angina and non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction experience from the FAME (Fractional flow reserve versus Angiography for Multivessel Evaluation) study.

Authors:  Jan-Willem E M Sels; Pim A L Tonino; Uwe Siebert; William F Fearon; Marcel Van't Veer; Bernard De Bruyne; Nico H J Pijls
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 11.195

8.  Role of chronic hyperglycemia in the pathogenesis of coronary microvascular dysfunction in diabetes.

Authors:  Marcelo F Di Carli; James Janisse; George Grunberger; Joel Ager
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2003-04-16       Impact factor: 24.094

9.  Role of incremental doses of intracoronary adenosine for fractional flow reserve assessment.

Authors:  Blaithnead Murtagh; Stuart Higano; Ryan Lennon; Verghese Mathew; David R Holmes; Amir Lerman
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 4.749

10.  Maximal coronary flow reserve and metabolic coronary vasodilation in patients with diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  P J Nahser; R E Brown; H Oskarsson; M D Winniford; J D Rossen
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1995-02-01       Impact factor: 29.690

View more
  10 in total

1.  Detection of coronary artery disease in postmenopausal women: the significance of integrated stress imaging tests in a 4-year prognostic study.

Authors:  Michael Becker; Anne Hundemer; Christian Zwicker; Ertunc Altiok; Thomas Krohn; Felix M Mottaghy; Christina Lente; Malte Kelm; Nikolaus Marx; Rainer Hoffmann
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2014-11-01       Impact factor: 5.460

2.  Predictors for target lesion microcalcifications in patients with stable coronary artery disease: an optical coherence tomography study.

Authors:  Sebastian Reith; Andrea Milzi; Rosalia Dettori; Nikolaus Marx; Mathias Burgmaier
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2018-04-13       Impact factor: 5.460

3.  Correlation between optical coherence tomography-derived intraluminal parameters and fractional flow reserve measurements in intermediate grade coronary lesions: a comparison between diabetic and non-diabetic patients.

Authors:  Sebastian Reith; Simone Battermann; Martin Hellmich; Nikolaus Marx; Mathias Burgmaier
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2014-08-15       Impact factor: 5.460

4.  Comparison of standard- and high-dose intracoronary adenosine for the measurement of coronary fractional flow reserve (FFR).

Authors:  Jens Röther; Stephan Achenbach; Monique Tröbs; Florian Blachutzik; Holger Nef; Mohamed Marwan; Christian Schlundt
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2016-06-15       Impact factor: 5.460

5.  Role of exercise cardiogoniometry in coronary artery disease diagnostics.

Authors:  A Weber; J Smid; B Luani; R C Braun-Dullaeus; I Tanev
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2017-03-13       Impact factor: 5.460

Review 6.  Role of coronary physiology in the contemporary management of coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Neil Ruparelia; Rajesh K Kharbanda
Journal:  World J Clin Cases       Date:  2015-02-16       Impact factor: 1.337

7.  Comparison of Major Adverse Cardiac Events Between Instantaneous Wave-Free Ratio and Fractional Flow Reserve-Guided Strategy in Patients With or Without Type 2 Diabetes: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Joo Myung Lee; Ki Hong Choi; Bon-Kwon Koo; Hakim-Moulay Dehbi; Joon-Hyung Doh; Chang-Wook Nam; Eun-Seok Shin; Christopher M Cook; Rasha Al-Lamee; Ricardo Petraco; Sayan Sen; Iqbal S Malik; Sukhjinder S Nijjer; Hernán Mejía-Rentería; Eduardo Alegria-Barrero; Ali Alghamdi; John Altman; Sérgio B Baptista; Ravinay Bhindi; Waldemar Bojara; Salvatore Brugaletta; Pedro Canas Silva; Carlo Di Mario; Andrejs Erglis; Robert T Gerber; Olaf Going; Tobias Härle; Farrel Hellig; Ciro Indolfi; Luc Janssens; Allen Jeremias; Rajesh K Kharbanda; Ahmed Khashaba; Yuetsu Kikuta; Florian Krackhardt; Mika Laine; Sam J Lehman; Hitoshi Matsuo; Martijin Meuwissen; Giampaolo Niccoli; Jan J Piek; Flavo Ribichini; Habib Samady; James Sapontis; Arnold H Seto; Murat Sezer; Andrew S P Sharp; Jasvindar Singh; Hiroaki Takashima; Suneel Talwar; Nobuhiro Tanaka; Kare Tang; Eric Van Belle; Niels van Royen; Hugo Vinhas; Christiaan J Vrints; Darren Walters; Hiroyoshi Yokoi; Bruce Samuels; Chris Buller; Manesh R Patel; Patrick Serruys; Javier Escaned; Justin E Davies
Journal:  JAMA Cardiol       Date:  2019-09-01       Impact factor: 14.676

8.  Influence of diabetes mellitus on the diagnostic performance of machine learning-based coronary CT angiography-derived fractional flow reserve: a multicenter study.

Authors:  Yi Xue; Min Wen Zheng; Yang Hou; Fan Zhou; Jian Hua Li; Yi Ning Wang; Chun Yu Liu; Chang Sheng Zhou; Jia Yin Zhang; Meng Meng Yu; Bo Zhang; Dai Min Zhang; Yan Yi; Lei Xu; Xiu Hua Hu; Guang Ming Lu; Chun Xiang Tang; Long Jiang Zhang
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2022-01-12       Impact factor: 5.315

9.  Clinical outcomes of deferred revascularisation using fractional flow reserve in patients with and without diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  Mark W Kennedy; Eliza Kaplan; Rik S Hermanides; Enrico Fabris; Veemal Hemradj; Petra C Koopmans; Jan-Hank E Dambrink; A T Marcel Gosselink; Arnoud W J Van't Hof; Jan Paul Ottervanger; Vincent Roolvink; Wouter S Remkes; Aize van der Sluis; Harry Suryapranata; Elvin Kedhi
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diabetol       Date:  2016-07-19       Impact factor: 9.951

10.  Diabetes does not impact the diagnostic performance of contrast-based fractional flow reserve: insights from the CONTRAST study.

Authors:  Giuseppe Gargiulo; Eugenio Stabile; Marco Ferrone; Emanuele Barbato; Frederik M Zimmermann; Julien Adjedj; Barry Hennigan; Mitsuaki Matsumura; Nils P Johnson; William F Fearon; Allen Jeremias; Bruno Trimarco; Giovanni Esposito
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diabetol       Date:  2017-01-13       Impact factor: 9.951

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.