H Liyanage, S de Lusignan1, S-T Liaw, C E Kuziemsky, F Mold, P Krause, D Fleming, S Jones. 1. Simon de Lusignan, Clinical Informatics & Health Outcomes research group, Department of Health Care Policy and Management, University of Surrey, GUILDFORD, Surrey GU2 7XH, UK, E-mail: s.lusignan@surrey.ac.uk.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Generally benefits and risks of vaccines can be determined from studies carried out as part of regulatory compliance, followed by surveillance of routine data; however there are some rarer and more long term events that require new methods. Big data generated by increasingly affordable personalised computing, and from pervasive computing devices is rapidly growing and low cost, high volume, cloud computing makes the processing of these data inexpensive. OBJECTIVE: To describe how big data and related analytical methods might be applied to assess the benefits and risks of vaccines. METHOD: We reviewed the literature on the use of big data to improve health, applied to generic vaccine use cases, that illustrate benefits and risks of vaccination. We defined a use case as the interaction between a user and an information system to achieve a goal. We used flu vaccination and pre-school childhood immunisation as exemplars. RESULTS: We reviewed three big data use cases relevant to assessing vaccine benefits and risks: (i) Big data processing using crowdsourcing, distributed big data processing, and predictive analytics, (ii) Data integration from heterogeneous big data sources, e.g. the increasing range of devices in the "internet of things", and (iii) Real-time monitoring for the direct monitoring of epidemics as well as vaccine effects via social media and other data sources. CONCLUSIONS: Big data raises new ethical dilemmas, though its analysis methods can bring complementary real-time capabilities for monitoring epidemics and assessing vaccine benefit-risk balance.
BACKGROUND: Generally benefits and risks of vaccines can be determined from studies carried out as part of regulatory compliance, followed by surveillance of routine data; however there are some rarer and more long term events that require new methods. Big data generated by increasingly affordable personalised computing, and from pervasive computing devices is rapidly growing and low cost, high volume, cloud computing makes the processing of these data inexpensive. OBJECTIVE: To describe how big data and related analytical methods might be applied to assess the benefits and risks of vaccines. METHOD: We reviewed the literature on the use of big data to improve health, applied to generic vaccine use cases, that illustrate benefits and risks of vaccination. We defined a use case as the interaction between a user and an information system to achieve a goal. We used flu vaccination and pre-school childhood immunisation as exemplars. RESULTS: We reviewed three big data use cases relevant to assessing vaccine benefits and risks: (i) Big data processing using crowdsourcing, distributed big data processing, and predictive analytics, (ii) Data integration from heterogeneous big data sources, e.g. the increasing range of devices in the "internet of things", and (iii) Real-time monitoring for the direct monitoring of epidemics as well as vaccine effects via social media and other data sources. CONCLUSIONS: Big data raises new ethical dilemmas, though its analysis methods can bring complementary real-time capabilities for monitoring epidemics and assessing vaccine benefit-risk balance.
Keywords:
Population surveillance; computerized; immunization; information science; medical record systems; public health
Authors: Anna Goldenberg; Galit Shmueli; Richard A Caruana; Stephen E Fienberg Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2002-04-16 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Siaw-Teng Liaw; Harshana Liyanage; Craig Kuziemsky; Amanda L Terry; Richard Schreiber; Jitendra Jonnagaddala; Simon de Lusignan Journal: Yearb Med Inform Date: 2020-04-17
Authors: Dylan McGagh; Simon de Lusignan; Harshana Liyanage; Bhautesh Dinesh Jani; Jorgen Bauwens; Rachel Byford; Dai Evans; Tom Fahey; Trisha Greenhalgh; Nicholas Jones; Frances S Mair; Cecilia Okusi; Vaishnavi Parimalanathan; Jill P Pell; Julian Sherlock; Oscar Tamburis; Manasa Tripathy; Filipa Ferreira; John Williams; F D Richard Hobbs Journal: JMIR Public Health Surveill Date: 2020-11-17