Simon de Lusignan1, Tom Chan, Alice Theadom, Neil Dhoul. 1. Primary Care Informatics, Division of Community Health Sciences, Hunter Wing, St. George's Hospital Medical School, London SW17 0RE, UK. slusigna@sgul.ac.uk
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Routinely collected clinical data is increasingly used for health service management, audit, and research. Even apparently anonymised data are subject to data protection. The relevant principles were set out in a treaty of the Council of Europe and subsequent policy has been based on these. However, little has been written about implementing policy and the role of health informaticians in this process. OBJECTIVE: To define the elements of an effective implementation policy; the role of the health informatician in protecting processed clinical data. METHODS: We performed a literature review of bibliographic databases, a manual search of the major medical informatics associations' websites, relevant working groups and an affiliated journal. Fifty-four papers relevant to implementation were identified. RESULTS: The effective implementation of policy requires consideration of technical, organisational, personnel and professional issues. However, there is no clearly defined formula for successful implementation of data protection policy. CONCLUSIONS: Patients and professionals need a system they can trust, and processes that can be easily incorporated into everyday practice. The lack of a core generalisable theory or strong professional code in health informatics limits the ability of the health informaticians to implement policy.
BACKGROUND: Routinely collected clinical data is increasingly used for health service management, audit, and research. Even apparently anonymised data are subject to data protection. The relevant principles were set out in a treaty of the Council of Europe and subsequent policy has been based on these. However, little has been written about implementing policy and the role of health informaticians in this process. OBJECTIVE: To define the elements of an effective implementation policy; the role of the health informatician in protecting processed clinical data. METHODS: We performed a literature review of bibliographic databases, a manual search of the major medical informatics associations' websites, relevant working groups and an affiliated journal. Fifty-four papers relevant to implementation were identified. RESULTS: The effective implementation of policy requires consideration of technical, organisational, personnel and professional issues. However, there is no clearly defined formula for successful implementation of data protection policy. CONCLUSIONS:Patients and professionals need a system they can trust, and processes that can be easily incorporated into everyday practice. The lack of a core generalisable theory or strong professional code in health informatics limits the ability of the health informaticians to implement policy.
Authors: Simon de Lusignan; Rob Navarro; Tom Chan; Glenys Parry; Kim Dent-Brown; Tony Kendrick Journal: BMC Med Inform Decis Mak Date: 2011-10-13 Impact factor: 2.796
Authors: Patty Kostkova; Helen Brewer; Simon de Lusignan; Edward Fottrell; Ben Goldacre; Graham Hart; Phil Koczan; Peter Knight; Corinne Marsolier; Rachel A McKendry; Emma Ross; Angela Sasse; Ralph Sullivan; Sarah Chaytor; Olivia Stevenson; Raquel Velho; John Tooke Journal: Front Public Health Date: 2016-02-17
Authors: Nicholas Jones; Simon de Lusignan; Jienchi Dorward; Rachel Byford; Harshana Liyanage; John Briggs; Filipa Ferreira; Oluwafunmi Akinyemi; Gayatri Amirthalingam; Chris Bates; Jamie Lopez Bernal; Gavin Dabrera; Alex Eavis; Alex J Elliot; Michael Feher; Else Krajenbrink; Uy Hoang; Gary Howsam; Jonathan Leach; Cecilia Okusi; Brian Nicholson; Philip Nieri; Julian Sherlock; Gillian Smith; Mark Thomas; Nicholas Thomas; Manasa Tripathy; William Victor; John Williams; Ian Wood; Maria Zambon; John Parry; Shaun O'Hanlon; Mark Joy; Chris Butler; Martin Marshall; F D Richard Hobbs Journal: JMIR Public Health Surveill Date: 2020-07-02