H Liyanage, S-T Liaw, C T Di Iorio, C Kuziemsky, R Schreiber, A L Terry, S de Lusignan1. 1. Simon de Lusignan, Professor of Primary Care and Clinical Informatics, Department of Clinical & Experimental Medicine, University of Surrey, GUILDFORD, Surrey GU2 7XH, UK, E-mail: s.lusignan@surrey.ac.uk.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Privacy, ethics, and data access issues pose significant challenges to the timely delivery of health research. Whilst the fundamental drivers to ensure that data access is ethical and satisfies privacy requirements are similar, they are often dealt with in varying ways by different approval processes. OBJECTIVE: To achieve a consensus across an international panel of health care and informatics professionals on an integrated set of privacy and ethics principles that could accelerate health data access in data-driven health research projects. METHOD: A three-round consensus development process was used. In round one, we developed a baseline framework for privacy, ethics, and data access based on a review of existing literature in the health, informatics, and policy domains. This was further developed using a two-round Delphi consensus building process involving 20 experts who were members of the International Medical Informatics Association (IMIA) and European Federation of Medical Informatics (EFMI) Primary Health Care Informatics Working Groups. To achieve consensus we required an extended Delphi process. RESULTS: The first round involved feedback on and development of the baseline framework. This consisted of four components: (1) ethical principles, (2) ethical guidance questions, (3) privacy and data access principles, and (4) privacy and data access guidance questions. Round two developed consensus in key areas of the revised framework, allowing the building of a newly, more detailed and descriptive framework. In the final round panel experts expressed their opinions, either as agreements or disagreements, on the ethics and privacy statements of the framework finding some of the previous round disagreements to be surprising in view of established ethical principles. CONCLUSION: This study develops a framework for an integrated approach to ethics and privacy. Privacy breech risk should not be considered in isolation but instead balanced by potential ethical benefit.
BACKGROUND: Privacy, ethics, and data access issues pose significant challenges to the timely delivery of health research. Whilst the fundamental drivers to ensure that data access is ethical and satisfies privacy requirements are similar, they are often dealt with in varying ways by different approval processes. OBJECTIVE: To achieve a consensus across an international panel of health care and informatics professionals on an integrated set of privacy and ethics principles that could accelerate health data access in data-driven health research projects. METHOD: A three-round consensus development process was used. In round one, we developed a baseline framework for privacy, ethics, and data access based on a review of existing literature in the health, informatics, and policy domains. This was further developed using a two-round Delphi consensus building process involving 20 experts who were members of the International Medical Informatics Association (IMIA) and European Federation of Medical Informatics (EFMI) Primary Health Care Informatics Working Groups. To achieve consensus we required an extended Delphi process. RESULTS: The first round involved feedback on and development of the baseline framework. This consisted of four components: (1) ethical principles, (2) ethical guidance questions, (3) privacy and data access principles, and (4) privacy and data access guidance questions. Round two developed consensus in key areas of the revised framework, allowing the building of a newly, more detailed and descriptive framework. In the final round panel experts expressed their opinions, either as agreements or disagreements, on the ethics and privacy statements of the framework finding some of the previous round disagreements to be surprising in view of established ethical principles. CONCLUSION: This study develops a framework for an integrated approach to ethics and privacy. Privacy breech risk should not be considered in isolation but instead balanced by potential ethical benefit.
Keywords:
Delphi technique; Privacy; biomedical ethics; health care ethics; patient data privacy
Authors: Concetta Tania Di Iorio; Fabrizio Carinci; Massimo Brillante; Joseph Azzopardi; Peter Beck; Natasa Bratina; Scott G Cunningham; Carine De Beaufort; Noemi Debacker; Przemyslawa Jarosz-Chobot; Michael Jecht; Ulf Lindblad; Tony Moulton; Želiko Metelko; Attila Nagy; George Olympios; Simion Pruna; Michael Røder; Svein Skeie; Fred Storms; Massimo Massi Benedetti Journal: Eur J Public Health Date: 2012-05-04 Impact factor: 3.367
Authors: Ruth R Faden; Nancy E Kass; Steven N Goodman; Peter Pronovost; Sean Tunis; Tom L Beauchamp Journal: Hastings Cent Rep Date: 2013 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 2.683
Authors: Chris Degeling; Jane Johnson; Ian Kerridge; Andrew Wilson; Michael Ward; Cameron Stewart; Gwendolyn Gilbert Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2015-12-29 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Adam Wright; Joan S Ash; Skye Aaron; Angela Ai; Thu-Trang T Hickman; Jane F Wiesen; William Galanter; Allison B McCoy; Richard Schreiber; Christopher A Longhurst; Dean F Sittig Journal: Int J Med Inform Date: 2018-08-02 Impact factor: 4.046
Authors: Siaw-Teng Liaw; Jason Guan Nan Guo; Sameera Ansari; Jitendra Jonnagaddala; Myron Anthony Godinho; Alder Jose Borelli; Simon de Lusignan; Daniel Capurro; Harshana Liyanage; Navreet Bhattal; Vicki Bennett; Jaclyn Chan; Michael G Kahn Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2021-07-14 Impact factor: 4.497
Authors: Siaw-Teng Liaw; Harshana Liyanage; Craig Kuziemsky; Amanda L Terry; Richard Schreiber; Jitendra Jonnagaddala; Simon de Lusignan Journal: Yearb Med Inform Date: 2020-04-17
Authors: Simon de Lusignan; William Hinton; Emmanouela Konstantara; Neil Munro; Martin Whyte; Julie Mount; Michael Feher Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2019-05-03 Impact factor: 2.655