Literature DB >> 19955374

Subthreshold activation of the superior colliculus drives saccade motor learning.

Robijanto Soetedjo1, Albert F Fuchs, Yoshiko Kojima.   

Abstract

How the brain learns and maintains accurate precision movements is currently unknown. At times throughout life, rapid gaze shifts (saccades) become inaccurate, but the brain makes gradual adjustments so they again stop on target. Previously, we showed that complex spikes (CSs) in Purkinje cells of the oculomotor cerebellum report the direction and amplitude by which saccades are in error. Anatomical studies indicate that this error signal could originate in the superior colliculus (SC). Here, we deliver subthreshold electrical stimulation of the SC after the saccade lands to signal an apparent error. The size of saccades in the same direction as the simulated error gradually increase; those in the opposite direction decrease. The electrically adapted saccades endure after stimulation is discontinued, exhibit an adaptation field, can undergo changes in direction, and depend on error timing. These electrically induced adaptations were virtually identical with those produced by the visually induced adaptations that we report here for comparable visual errors in the same monkeys. Therefore, our experiments reveal that an additional role for the SC in the generation of saccades is to provide a vector error signal that drives dysmetric saccades to adapt. Moreover, the characteristics of the electrically induced adaptation reflect those of error-related CS activity in the oculomotor cerebellum, suggesting that CS activity serves as the learning signal. We speculate that CS activity may serve as the error signal that drives other kinds of motor learning as well.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19955374      PMCID: PMC2828496          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4296-09.2009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  31 in total

1.  Saccadic dysmetria and adaptation after lesions of the cerebellar cortex.

Authors:  S Barash; A Melikyan; A Sivakov; M Zhang; M Glickstein; P Thier
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1999-12-15       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 2.  Mechanisms of motor learning in the cerebellum.

Authors:  M Ito
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2000-12-15       Impact factor: 3.252

3.  Cervical branching of lumbar vestibulospinal axons.

Authors:  C Abzug; M Maeda; B W Peterson; V J Wilson
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1974-12       Impact factor: 5.182

4.  A method for measuring horizontal and vertical eye movement chronically in the monkey.

Authors:  A F Fuchs; D A Robinson
Journal:  J Appl Physiol       Date:  1966-05       Impact factor: 3.531

5.  A theory of cerebellar cortex.

Authors:  D Marr
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1969-06       Impact factor: 5.182

6.  Activity of superior colliculus in behaving monkey. I. Visual receptive fields of single neurons.

Authors:  M E Goldberg; R H Wurtz
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1972-07       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Eye movements evoked by collicular stimulation in the alert monkey.

Authors:  D A Robinson
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1972-11       Impact factor: 1.886

8.  Cerebellar lesions impair rapid saccade amplitude adaptation.

Authors:  A Straube; H Deubel; J Ditterich; T Eggert
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2001-12-11       Impact factor: 9.910

9.  Effect of visual error size on saccade adaptation in monkey.

Authors:  Farrel R Robinson; Christopher T Noto; Scott E Bevans
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2003-04-23       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  Learning signals from the superior colliculus for adaptation of saccadic eye movements in the monkey.

Authors:  Yuki Kaku; Kaoru Yoshida; Yoshiki Iwamoto
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2009-04-22       Impact factor: 6.167

View more
  26 in total

1.  Conjugate adaptation of smooth pursuit during monocular viewing in strabismic monkeys with exotropia.

Authors:  Seiji Ono; Vallabh E Das; Michael J Mustari
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2012-04-24       Impact factor: 4.799

Review 2.  Saccade adaptation as a model of learning in voluntary movements.

Authors:  Yoshiki Iwamoto; Yuki Kaku
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-06-11       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Modulation of error-sensitivity during a prism adaptation task in people with cerebellar degeneration.

Authors:  Ritsuko Hanajima; Reza Shadmehr; Shinya Ohminami; Ryosuke Tsutsumi; Yuichiro Shirota; Takahiro Shimizu; Nobuyuki Tanaka; Yasuo Terao; Shoji Tsuji; Yoshikazu Ugawa; Motoaki Uchimura; Masato Inoue; Shigeru Kitazawa
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-08-26       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Transcranial magnetic stimulation and motor plasticity in human lateral cerebellum: dual effect on saccadic adaptation.

Authors:  Muriel Panouillères; Sebastiaan F W Neggers; Tjerk P Gutteling; Roméo Salemme; Stefan van der Stigchel; Josef N van der Geest; Maarten A Frens; Denis Pélisson
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2011-06-20       Impact factor: 5.038

Review 5.  Evaluating the adaptive-filter model of the cerebellum.

Authors:  Paul Dean; John Porrill
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2011-04-18       Impact factor: 5.182

6.  How cerebellar motor learning keeps saccades accurate.

Authors:  Robijanto Soetedjo; Yoshiko Kojima; Albert F Fuchs
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2019-04-17       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Selective reward affects the rate of saccade adaptation.

Authors:  Yoshiko Kojima; Robijanto Soetedjo
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2017-05-10       Impact factor: 3.590

8.  Learning to Predict and Control the Physics of Our Movements.

Authors:  Reza Shadmehr
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2017-02-15       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  A memory of errors in sensorimotor learning.

Authors:  David J Herzfeld; Pavan A Vaswani; Mollie K Marko; Reza Shadmehr
Journal:  Science       Date:  2014-08-14       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  Saccadic adaptation to a systematically varying disturbance.

Authors:  Carlos R Cassanello; Sven Ohl; Martin Rolfs
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-04-20       Impact factor: 2.714

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.